Literature DB >> 17762669

Comparative results of the conservative treatment in clubfoot by two different protocols.

Dan Cosma1, Dana Vasilescu, Dan Vasilescu, Madalina Valeanu.   

Abstract

The current study aims at presenting the results of the two methods of conservative treatment in clubfoot: the Romanian traditional method and the Ponseti method. The study population included 103 children (148 clubfeet) treated in our department between 1998 and 2005. Between 1998 and 2003, the conservative treatment protocol was based upon the Romanian method. The Ponseti method has been used since 2004. The main criterion for the assessment of the efficiency of the two conservative methods in clubfoot is the number of feet requiring surgical treatment - posteromedial release at 18 months. This criterion is clearly in favor of the Ponseti method: four feet (5%) needed posteromedial release in Ponseti group patients versus 13 feet (18%) in Romanian group patients (P=0.0193). The Ponseti method is safe, efficient in the conservative treatment of clubfoot and decreases the number of surgical interventions needed for the correction of the deformation compared with our traditional method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17762669     DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32826d18a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  8 in total

1.  Resource utilization in clubfoot management.

Authors:  Matthew A Halanski; Jen-Chen Huang; Stewart J Walsh; Haemish A Crawford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cost-effectiveness of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot in Pakistan.

Authors:  Hamidah Hussain; Aziza Moiz Burfat; Lubna Samad; Fayez Jawed; Muhammad Amin Chinoy; Mansoor Ali Khan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: minimum 5-year followup.

Authors:  Noam Bor; Julie A Coplan; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Gait analysis after initial nonoperative treatment for clubfeet: intermediate term followup at age 5.

Authors:  Lori A Karol; Kelly Jeans; Ron ElHawary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of different conservative treatments for idiopathic clubfoot: Ponseti's versus non-Ponseti's methods.

Authors:  Jin-Peng He; Jing Fan Shao; Yun Hao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  A Community Audit of 300 "Drop-Out" Instances in Children Undergoing Ponseti Clubfoot Care in Bangladesh-What Do the Parents Say?

Authors:  Angela Margaret Evans; Mamun Chowdhury; Sharif Khan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Histological and radiographic evaluation of three common tendon transfer techniques in an un-ossified bone porcine model: implications for early anterior tibialis tendon transfers in children with clubfeet.

Authors:  Kyle Korth; Scott Bolam; Ellen Leiferman; Thomas Crenshaw; Michael Dray; Haemish A Crawford; Maegen Wallace; Matthew A Halanski
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Ponseti Technique for the Management of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus in a Rural Set-Up in India: Experience of 356 Patients.

Authors:  Rohit Malhotra; Ashutosh Mohapatra; Geetika Arora; Priyam Choudhury; Hitesh Joshi; Pranav Patel
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.