Literature DB >> 34857528

Ray tracing intraocular lens calculation performance improved by AI-powered postoperative lens position prediction.

Tingyang Li1, Aparna Reddy2, Joshua D Stein2,3,4, Nambi Nallasamy5,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves cataract surgery refraction prediction performance of a commonly used ray tracing power calculation suite (OKULIX). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A dataset of 4357 eyes of 4357 patients with cataract was gathered at the Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan. A previously developed machine learning (ML)-based method was used to predict the postoperative ACD based on preoperative biometry measured with the Lenstar LS900 optical biometer. Refraction predictions were computed with standard OKULIX postoperative ACD predictions and ML-based predictions of postoperative ACD. The performance of the ray tracing approach with and without ML-based ACD prediction was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE) in refraction prediction as metrics.
RESULTS: Replacing the standard OKULIX postoperative ACD with the ML-predicted ACD resulted in statistically significant reductions in both MAE (1.7% after zeroing mean error) and MedAE (2.1% after zeroing mean error). ML-predicted ACD substantially improved performance in eyes with short and long axial lengths (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Using an ML-powered postoperative ACD prediction method improves the prediction accuracy of the OKULIX ray tracing suite by a clinically small but statistically significant amount, with the greatest effect seen in long eyes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior chamber; lens and zonules; optics and refraction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34857528      PMCID: PMC9160201          DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   5.908


  7 in total

1.  Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  T Olsen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Sverker Norrby
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  [Comparison between ray-tracing and IOL calculation formulae of the 3rd generation].

Authors:  P-R Preussner; P Hoffmann; K Petermeier
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  Prediction of the true IOL position.

Authors:  Sverker Norrby; Rolf Bergman; Nino Hirnschall; Yutaro Nishi; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Intraocular lens calculation for aspheric intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Peter C Hoffmann; Christoph R Lindemann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye.

Authors:  J T Holladay
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Calculating intraocular lens geometry by real ray tracing.

Authors:  Jens Einighammer; Theo Oltrup; Thomas Bende; Benedikt Jean
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.