Literature DB >> 3485627

Directional hearing in the grassfrog (Rana temporaria L.). II. Acoustics and modelling of the auditory periphery.

A M Aertsen, M S Vlaming, J J Eggermont, P I Johannesma.   

Abstract

In an earlier paper (Vlaming et al., 1984) we reported on optical measurements (laser-doppler interferometry) of the vibrations characteristics of the grassfrog's tympanic membrane. In the present paper these measurements were extended to include acoustic measurements concerning the functional role of the mouth cavity in frog hearing. Based on these measurements a model of the frog's acoustic periphery, consisting of three coupled linear oscillators with three entrance ports for sound, was developed and analyzed mathematically to give the various relevant transfer functions. The model is characterized by six parameters, all of which could be estimated from the available experimental data. For frequencies up to some 1500 Hz the model adequately describes the experimental data, both our own and earlier, seemingly conflicting data in the literature. For higher frequencies deviations occur, possibly due to nonuniform vibrations of the membranes. The model was used to evaluate the monaural directional sensitivity of the frog under free-field stimulation. Essentially it behaves as a combined pressure-gradient receiver, with highly frequency-dependent directional sensitivity. Directional sensitivity of the tympanic membrane could be modulated drastically by changing the resonance properties of the mouth cavity, without affecting the intrinsic membrane properties. This, theoretically, allows the frog to manipulate its direction sensitivity by actively tuning the volume of its mouth cavity. In order to account for discrepancies with known properties of low-frequency auditory nerve fibers an additional, extra-tympanic channel was included into the model. The extended model, the second-channel possibly involving the opercularis complex, provides a good quantitative fit to the available data on tympanic membrane movement as well as auditory nerve activity. Finally, the model enables to simulate a (moving) sound source in space, while stimulating the frog via closed couplers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3485627     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90043-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Directionality of phase locking in auditory nerve fibers of the leopard frog Rana pipiens pipiens.

Authors:  B Schmitz; T D White; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Directional hearing in the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor: eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis.

Authors:  M B Jørgensen; H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  How minute sooglossid frogs hear without a middle ear.

Authors:  Renaud Boistel; Thierry Aubin; Peter Cloetens; Françoise Peyrin; Thierry Scotti; Philippe Herzog; Justin Gerlach; Nicolas Pollet; Jean-François Aubry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Norman Lee; Katrina M Schrode; Anastasia R Johns; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Accessory pathway for sound transfer in a neotropical frog.

Authors:  P M Narins; G Ehret; J Tautz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; C Resler; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Biomechanics of vibration reception in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  T E Hetherington
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.