GOAL: To develop a low-cost magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-free transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) system for microbubble-mediated therapy. METHODS: A 128-element 11 MHz array for skull localization was integrated within a 256-module multi-frequency (306/612/1224 kHz) dual-mode phased array. The system's transcranial transmit and receive performance was evaluated with ex-vivo human skullcaps using phase aberration corrections calculated from computed tomography (CT)-based simulations via ultrasound-based (USCT) and landmark-based (LMCT) registrations, and a gold-standard fixed source emitter (FSE)-based method. RESULTS: Displacement and rotation registration errors of 1.4 ± 0.4 mm and 2.1 ± 0.2 ° were obtained using USCT, resulting in sub-millimeter transmit targeting errors driven at 306 kHz (0.9 ± 0.2 mm) and 612 kHz (0.9 ± 0.3 mm), and source localization errors of 1.0 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm at receive frequencies of 306 kHz and 612 kHz, respectively (mean ± SD). Similar errors were obtained using LMCT and no significant differences between these two approaches were found on either transmit (p = 0.64/0.99) or receive (p = 0.45/0.36) at 306 kHz/612kHz. During volumetric multi-point exposures, approximately 70% and 60% of the transmit frames in which microbubble activity was detected via FSE were recovered using USCT when imaging at the second-harmonic and half-harmonic, respectively, compared to 60% and 69% using LMCT. CONCLUSION: This low-cost ultrasound-guided transcranial FUS system affords USCT skull registration with accuracy comparable to LMCT methods. SIGNIFICANCE: Such systems have great potential to advance the adoption of microbubble-mediated FUS brain therapy by improving access to the technology.
GOAL: To develop a low-cost magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-free transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) system for microbubble-mediated therapy. METHODS: A 128-element 11 MHz array for skull localization was integrated within a 256-module multi-frequency (306/612/1224 kHz) dual-mode phased array. The system's transcranial transmit and receive performance was evaluated with ex-vivo human skullcaps using phase aberration corrections calculated from computed tomography (CT)-based simulations via ultrasound-based (USCT) and landmark-based (LMCT) registrations, and a gold-standard fixed source emitter (FSE)-based method. RESULTS: Displacement and rotation registration errors of 1.4 ± 0.4 mm and 2.1 ± 0.2 ° were obtained using USCT, resulting in sub-millimeter transmit targeting errors driven at 306 kHz (0.9 ± 0.2 mm) and 612 kHz (0.9 ± 0.3 mm), and source localization errors of 1.0 ± 0.3 mm and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm at receive frequencies of 306 kHz and 612 kHz, respectively (mean ± SD). Similar errors were obtained using LMCT and no significant differences between these two approaches were found on either transmit (p = 0.64/0.99) or receive (p = 0.45/0.36) at 306 kHz/612kHz. During volumetric multi-point exposures, approximately 70% and 60% of the transmit frames in which microbubble activity was detected via FSE were recovered using USCT when imaging at the second-harmonic and half-harmonic, respectively, compared to 60% and 69% using LMCT. CONCLUSION: This low-cost ultrasound-guided transcranial FUS system affords USCT skull registration with accuracy comparable to LMCT methods. SIGNIFICANCE: Such systems have great potential to advance the adoption of microbubble-mediated FUS brain therapy by improving access to the technology.
Authors: Tao Sun; Yongzhi Zhang; Chanikarn Power; Phillip M Alexander; Jonathan T Sutton; Muna Aryal; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Eric L Miller; Nathan J McDannold Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christoph Amstutz; Marco Caversaccio; Jens Kowal; Richard Bächler; Lutz-Peter Nolte; Rudolf Häusler; Martin Styner Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2003-12
Authors: Calum Crake; Spencer T Brinker; Christian M Coviello; Margaret S Livingstone; Nathan J McDannold Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: W Jeffrey Elias; Diane Huss; Tiffini Voss; Johanna Loomba; Mohamad Khaled; Eyal Zadicario; Robert C Frysinger; Scott A Sperling; Scott Wylie; Stephen J Monteith; Jason Druzgal; Binit B Shah; Madaline Harrison; Max Wintermark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hanna Bendjador; Josquin Foiret; Robert Wodnicki; Douglas N Stephens; Zoe Krut; Eun-Yeong Park; Zulma Gazit; Dan Gazit; Gadi Pelled; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Theranostics Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 11.600
Authors: Shuiping Zhu; Bin Meng; Jianping Jiang; Xiaotao Wang; Na Luo; Ning Liu; Huaping Shen; Lu Wang; Qian Li Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 5.505