Literature DB >> 34855541

Anatomical self-efficacy of undergraduate students improves during a fully online biology course with at-home dissections.

Jacob P Youngblood1, Emily A Webb2, Logan E Gin1, Peter van Leusen3, Joanna R Henry2, John M VandenBrooks4, Sara E Brownell1.   

Abstract

Student enrollments in online college courses have grown steadily over the past decade, and college administrators expect this trend to continue or accelerate. Despite the growing popularity of online education, one major critique in the sciences is that students are not trained in the hands-on skills they may need for the workforce, graduate school, or professional school. For example, the Association of American Medical Colleges has recommended that medical schools evaluate applicants on their motor skills and observation skills, yet many online biology programs do not offer opportunities for students to develop these skills. In on-campus biology programs, students commonly develop these skills through hands-on animal dissections, but educators have struggled with how to teach dissections in an online environment. We designed a fully online undergraduate biology course that includes at-home, hands-on dissections of eight vertebrate specimens. Over three course offerings, we evaluated changes in four student outcomes: anatomical self-efficacy, confidence in laboratory skills, perceptions of support, and concerns about dissections. Here, we describe how we implemented at-home dissections in the online course and show that students taking the course gained anatomical self-efficacy and confidence in multiple laboratory skills. Based on open-ended responses, the students perceived that their experiences with the at-home dissections facilitated these gains. These results demonstrate that at-home, hands-on laboratories are a viable approach for teaching practical skills to students in fully online courses. We encourage science instructors to introduce at-home laboratories into their online courses, and we provide recommendations for instructors interested in implementing at-home laboratories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; distance education; laboratory kit; online learning; zoology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34855541      PMCID: PMC8791788          DOI: 10.1152/advan.00139.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  28 in total

1.  Animals in research and education: ethical issues.

Authors:  L J Bishop; A L Nolen
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-03

2.  Self-efficacy's influence on student academic achievement in the medical anatomy curriculum.

Authors:  Jennifer Marie Burgoon; Judith L Meece; Noelle A Granger
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Comparison of a gross anatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teaching anatomy.

Authors:  Virgil Mathiowetz; Chih-Huang Yu; Cindee Quake-Rapp
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Diagnosing differences in what Introductory Biology students in a fully online and an in-person biology degree program know and do regarding medical school admission.

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Logan E Gin; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  A meta-analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies.

Authors:  Adam B Wilson; Corinne H Miller; Barbie A Klein; Melissa A Taylor; Michael Goodwin; Eve K Boyle; Kirsten Brown; Chantal Hoppe; Michelle Lazarus
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.

Authors:  Sara A Lombardi; Reimi E Hicks; Katerina V Thompson; Gili Marbach-Ad
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Stefanie M Attardi; Michele L Barbeau; Kem A Rogers
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Three-dimensional digital technologies in anatomy education: Better than traditional methods, but are they better than cadaveric dissection?

Authors:  Dimitrios Chytas; Maria Piagkou; Marios Salmas; Elizabeth O Johnson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.414

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.