Literature DB >> 31088159

Diagnosing differences in what Introductory Biology students in a fully online and an in-person biology degree program know and do regarding medical school admission.

Katelyn M Cooper1, Logan E Gin1, Sara E Brownell1.   

Abstract

Increasingly, institutions of higher education are adopting fully online degree programs to provide students with cost-effective, accessible postsecondary education. A concern these degrees raise is: Will students be prepared for the next step of their career paths after completing their Bachelor's degree online? Biology undergraduates often begin their degrees wanting to become medical doctors, but no studies have explored whether students in a fully online biology degree program are being prepared to be admitted to medical school. In this study, we surveyed Introductory Biology students at one institution who were pursuing Bachelor of Science degrees in Biological Sciences, either in an online or an in-person program. The most prevalent career goal for both in-person students (65.2%) and online students (39.7%) was a medical doctor. Online students were more confident in their intentions to become doctors than their in-person peers. However, online students knew fewer criteria that medical schools consider when admitting students than in-person students [in-person: mean = 3.7 (SD 1.6); online: mean =2.7 (SD 1.7)] and were less likely to plan to become involved in premedical activities, such as undergraduate research. Finally, compared with in-person students, fewer online students were able to name at least one science student (in-person: 76.7%; online: 9.7%), academic advisor (in-person: 21.3%; online: 6.5%), and faculty member (in-person: 33.7%; online: 6.5%) with whom they could talk about pursuing a career in medicine. This work highlights knowledge gaps between students enrolled in a fully online biology degree and an in-person biology degree that are important for developers of online biology degree programs to understand and rectify to better prepare online biology students for admission to medical school.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distance education; medical school; online biology degree; online education; premed

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31088159     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00028.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  10 in total

1.  Anatomical self-efficacy of undergraduate students improves during a fully online biology course with at-home dissections.

Authors:  Jacob P Youngblood; Emily A Webb; Logan E Gin; Peter van Leusen; Joanna R Henry; John M VandenBrooks; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Depression as a concealable stigmatized identity: what influences whether students conceal or reveal their depression in undergraduate research experiences?

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Logan E Gin; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  Int J STEM Educ       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences.

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Logan E Gin; Barierane Akeeh; Carolyn E Clark; Joshua S Hunter; Travis B Roderick; Deanna B Elliott; Luis A Gutierrez; Rebecca M Mello; Leilani D Pfeiffer; Rachel A Scott; Denisse Arellano; Diana Ramirez; Emma M Valdez; Cindy Vargas; Kimberly Velarde; Yi Zheng; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Online biology degree program broadens access for women, first-generation to college, and low-income students, but grade disparities remain.

Authors:  Chris Mead; K Supriya; Yi Zheng; Ariel D Anbar; James P Collins; Paul LePore; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Student Perceptions of Authoring a Publication Stemming from a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE).

Authors:  Ashley N Turner; Anil K Challa; Katelyn M Cooper
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  An Exploration across Institution Types of Undergraduate Life Sciences Student Decisions to Stay in or Leave an Academic-Year Research Experience.

Authors:  Logan E Gin; Carolyn E Clark; Deanna B Elliott; Travis B Roderick; Rachel A Scott; Denisse Arellano; Diana Ramirez; Cindy Vargas; Kimberly Velarde; Allyson Aeschliman; Sarah T Avalle; Jessica Berkheimer; Rachel Campos; Michael Gerbasi; Sophia Hughes; Julie A Roberts; Quinn M White; Ehren Wittekind; Yi Zheng; Katelyn M Cooper; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  The Experiences of Undergraduates with Depression in Online Science Learning Environments.

Authors:  Tasneem F Mohammed; Logan E Gin; Nicholas J Wiesenthal; Katelyn M Cooper
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.955

8.  COVID-19 and Undergraduates with Disabilities: Challenges Resulting from the Rapid Transition to Online Course Delivery for Students with Disabilities in Undergraduate STEM at Large-Enrollment Institutions.

Authors:  Logan E Gin; Frank A Guerrero; Sara E Brownell; Katelyn M Cooper
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Fear of Negative Evaluation and Student Anxiety in Community College Active-Learning Science Courses.

Authors:  Virginia R Downing; Katelyn M Cooper; Jacqueline M Cala; Logan E Gin; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  An Exploratory Study of Students with Depression in Undergraduate Research Experiences.

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Logan E Gin; M Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.325

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.