Mariana M Chaves1, Henrique Donato2, Nuno Campos2, David Silva3, Luís Curvo-Semedo2,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada EPE, Ponta Delgada, Portugal. m.m.chvs@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 3. Department of Radiology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada EPE, Ponta Delgada, Portugal. 4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Abstract
PROPOSE: To assess the interobserver variability in MRI measurements of mesorectal invasion depth (MID) in rectal adenocarcinomas primarily staged as T3, by determining the level of interobserver agreement in the differentiation of individual T3 substages and of T3a-b vs. T3c-d disease, between readers with different levels of expertise. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients classified by MRI as having T3 rectal cancers was performed. Each patient underwent MR examination in a 1.5 T machine and the standard imaging protocol included a high-resolution axial T2-weighted sequence in which the measurements were determined by independent radiologists (readers A and B, with 15 years and 1 year of experience, respectively). The rectum was further divided into quadrants and each reader selected the quadrant where the measurement was taken. The patients were grouped according to the MID (T3a < 1 mm; T3b 1-5 mm; T3c > 5-15 mm; T3d > 15 mm) and the interobserver reliability was tested using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Population included 40 males and 20 females with a median age of 65.9 years. Interobserver agreement on individual substage differentiation (T3 a, b, c and d) was moderate (K = 0.428) and in the quadrant evaluation the level of agreement was also moderate (K = 0.414). Nevertheless, the interobserver reliability for the differentiation between stages T3a-b vs. T3c-d was substantial (K = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS: There is no considerable interobserver variability when distinguishing T3a-b from T3c-d tumors, regardless of the quadrant where the MID is measured. Therefore, assessment of MID, for that purpose, is a reproducible MR parameter, irrespectively of the readers' experience.
PROPOSE: To assess the interobserver variability in MRI measurements of mesorectal invasion depth (MID) in rectal adenocarcinomas primarily staged as T3, by determining the level of interobserver agreement in the differentiation of individual T3 substages and of T3a-b vs. T3c-d disease, between readers with different levels of expertise. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients classified by MRI as having T3 rectal cancers was performed. Each patient underwent MR examination in a 1.5 T machine and the standard imaging protocol included a high-resolution axial T2-weighted sequence in which the measurements were determined by independent radiologists (readers A and B, with 15 years and 1 year of experience, respectively). The rectum was further divided into quadrants and each reader selected the quadrant where the measurement was taken. The patients were grouped according to the MID (T3a < 1 mm; T3b 1-5 mm; T3c > 5-15 mm; T3d > 15 mm) and the interobserver reliability was tested using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Population included 40 males and 20 females with a median age of 65.9 years. Interobserver agreement on individual substage differentiation (T3 a, b, c and d) was moderate (K = 0.428) and in the quadrant evaluation the level of agreement was also moderate (K = 0.414). Nevertheless, the interobserver reliability for the differentiation between stages T3a-b vs. T3c-d was substantial (K = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS: There is no considerable interobserver variability when distinguishing T3a-b from T3c-d tumors, regardless of the quadrant where the MID is measured. Therefore, assessment of MID, for that purpose, is a reproducible MR parameter, irrespectively of the readers' experience.
Authors: G Brown; C J Richards; R G Newcombe; N S Dallimore; A G Radcliffe; D P Carey; M W Bourne; G T Williams Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Leonardo S Lino-Silva; Reynaldo Loaeza-Belmont; Miguel A Gómez Álvarez; Itzel Vela-Sarmiento; José M Aguilar-Romero; Jorge A Domínguez-Rodríguez; Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández; Erika B Ruiz-García; Héctor A Maldonado-Martínez; Ángel Herrera-Gómez Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Shandra Bipat; Brunella Barbaro; Luís Curvo-Semedo; Helen M Fenlon; Marc J Gollub; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Steve Halligan; Christine Hoeffel; Seung Ho Kim; Andrea Laghi; Andrea Maier; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jaap Stoker; Stuart A Taylor; Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.315