| Literature DB >> 34854411 |
Sukender Kumar1, Chanchal Garg1, Samander Kaushik2, Harpal Singh Buttar3, Munish Garg1.
Abstract
Viral infections are posing a great threat to humanity for the last few years. Among these, Chikungunya which is a mosquito-borne viral infection has produced enormous epidemics around the world after been rebounded. Although this infection shows a low mortality rate, patients suffer from fever, arthralgia, and maculopapular rashes, which reduce the quality of life for several weeks to years. The currently available treatments only provide symptomatic relief based on analgesics, antipyretics, and anti-inflammatory drugs which are nonspecific without satisfactory results. Medicinal plants are a widely accepted source of new molecules for the treatment of infectious diseases including viral infections. The scientific reports, primarily focusing on the anti-chikungunya activity of plant extracts, natural origin pure compounds, and their synthetic analog published from 2011 to 2021, were selected from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus by using related keywords like anti-chikungunya plants, natural antivirals for Chikungunya. The present review decodes scientific reports on medicinal plants against chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection and demystifies the potential phytoconstituents which reveals that the screening of flavonoids containing plants and phytochemicals showing efficacy against other arbovirus infections, may prove as a potential lead for drug development against CHIKV. The present article also outlines pathogenesis, clinical aspects, molecular virology, and diagnostic approaches of CHIKV infection.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-chikungunya plants; Flavonoids; antiviral therapy; chikungunya virus; clinical aspects; molecular virology; natural antivirals; pathogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34854411 PMCID: PMC8641736 DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_81_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Cytotoxicity and anti-chikungunya activity of plant extracts in Vero cells by cytopathic effect inhibition assay[13]
| Plant name | Nature of extract | CC50 | IC50 | Selective index (CC50/IC50) | Mechanism of action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Ethyl acetate | >640 µg/ml | 227 | >2.8 | Not reported |
| Ethanol | 455 µg/ml | 132 | 3.4 | Not reported | |
| Chloroform | 161 | 29 | 5.4 | Direct virucidal effect | |
|
| Chloroform | 238 | 60 | 4.0 | Direct virucidal and inhibit viral replication |
| Ethanol | ND | 202 | ND | ||
| Methanol | ND | 179 | ND | ||
|
| Ethyl acetate | 165 | 32 | 5.1 | Direct virucidal effect |
| Ethanol | 272 | 67 | 4.0 | ||
| Methanol | 485 | 200 | 2.4 |
ND= Not determined as no significant cytotoxicity found at the highestconcentration (640 μg/ml) tested.
Antichikungunya activity of plant extracts in Vero cells by cytopathic effect inhibition assay
| Plant name | Nature of extract | Concentration (µg/ml) | Viral inhibition (%) | Mechanism of action | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous | 31.25 | >75 | Inhibit viral genome replication | [ | |
| Aqueous | 125 | >25 | Inhibit virus entry | [ | |
| Aqueous | 250 | >1 | Inhibit virus entry | [ | |
| Aqueous, methanol | 150 | 10 | Inhibit viral replication | [ | |
| Ethanol | 5025 | 9888 | Inhibit viral replication | [ | |
| Aqueous | 15 | 60 | Inhibit viral replication | [ |
Antichikungunya activity of plant aqueous extracts in Vero cells[33]
| Plant name | Assay employed | Concentration (µg/ml) | Viral inhibition (%) | Mechanism of action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Replication inhibition assay | 200 | 67 | Inhibit viral replication | |
| Replication inhibition assay | 200 | 100 | Inhibit viral replication | |
| Replication inhibition assay | 200 | 100 | Inhibit viral replication | |
| Plaque reduction assay | 10 | >80 | Inhibit viral replication | |
| Replication inhibition assay | 200 | 31.6 | Inhibit viral attachment | |
| Replication inhibition assay | 200 | 36.6 | Inhibit viral attachment |
Antichikungunya activity of baicalein, fisetin, and quercetagetin in Vero cells[48]
| Compound | MNTD (µg/ml) | CC50 (µg/ml) | IC50 (µg/ml) | Selectivity index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baicalein | 183.2 | 356.3 | 1.891 | 188.4 |
| Fisetin | >100 | 194.4 | 8.444 | 23.02 |
| Quercetagetin | 173.5 | 226.7 | 13.85 | 16.3 |
MNTD=Maximum nontoxic dose
Figure 1Comparison of the anti-chikungunya activity of extracts of different solvent