Literature DB >> 27783358

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Philip W Chiu1,2,3, Anthony Y Teoh4,5, Vivien W Wong4,5, Hon Chi Yip4,5, Shannon M Chan4,5, Simon K Wong4,5, Enders K Ng4,6,5.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is technically challenging. Da Vinci Robotic system could improve surgical dissection with additional degree of freedom from robotic arms. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of performing MIE using Da Vinci Robotic system among patients with esophageal cancers. From 2009 to 2013, consecutive patients with esophageal cancers who received robotic-assisted MIE were recruited. We excluded tumors with suspected invasion to adjacent organs. Preoperative staging included EUS, CT thorax and abdomen and bronchoscopy. We perform mobilization of thoracic esophagus with two-field lymphadenectomy using robotic system, followed by laparoscopic gastric mobilization and hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. A total of 20 patients were recruited (16 male and 4 female) with mean age of 64.2 ± 8.8 years. All patients were successfully treated with robotic-assisted MIE with mean operative time of 499.5 ± 70 min and blood loss of 355.7 ± 329.6 mls. There was no pulmonary complication, while three patients sustained anastomotic leakage and managed conservatively. The mean hospital stay was 13 ± 6 days. Five patients had stage I tumors, five had stage II, and nine had stage III disease. One patient had complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The number of lymph node dissection was 18.2 ± 13.2, and 2.8 ± 5.7 nodes involved. The follow-up period was 21 ± 9 months, and the overall survival was 75 %. Robotic-assisted MIE is feasible and safe for treatment of esophageal cancers. The surgical dissection can be enhanced by improved ergonomics from robotic arms and sense of depth from 3D images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoma of esophagus; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robotic esophagectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27783358     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0644-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  18 in total

Review 1.  Two-field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  S Law; J Wong
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience.

Authors:  K H Kernstine
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Kazuki Inaba; Seiichiro Kanaya; Satoshi Teramukai; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition).

Authors:  Hui Li; Wentao Fang; Zhentao Yu; Yousheng Mao; Longqi Chen; Jie He; Tiehua Rong; Chun Chen; Haiquan Chen; Keneng Chen; Ming Du; Yongtao Han; Jian Hu; Jianhua Fu; Xiaobin Hou; Taiqian Gong; Yin Li; Junfeng Liu; Shuoyan Liu; Lijie Tan; Hui Tian; Qun Wang; Jiaqing Xiang; Meiqing Xu; Xin Ye; Bin You; Renquan Zhang; Yan Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Transcervical minimally invasive esophagectomy using da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System: a feasibility study in cadaveric model.

Authors:  Philip W Y Chiu; Simon S M Ng; Samuel K W Au
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Three-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections: an update.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Mirko Barone; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-04

Review 4.  Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

Authors:  Jun Kanamori; Masayuki Watanabe; Suguru Maruyama; Yasukazu Kanie; Daisuke Fujiwara; Kei Sakamoto; Akihiko Okamura; Yu Imamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.540

5.  Robot assisted esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaobin Zhang; Yuchen Su; Yu Yang; Yifeng Sun; Bo Ye; Xufeng Guo; Teng Mao; Rong Hua; Zhigang Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Compare the prognosis of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Dongjie Ma; Shanqing Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: Merits and demerits.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Seto; Kazuhiko Mori; Susumu Aikou
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-08-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.