| Literature DB >> 34853326 |
Stefan Candefjord1,2,3, Linh Nguyen4, Ruben Buendia4,5,6, Marianne Oropeza-Moe7, Nina Gjerde Andersen8, Andreas Fhager4,6, Mikael Persson4,6, Mikael Elam6,9, Nils Petter Oveland8,10.
Abstract
Abdominal injury is a frequent cause of death for trauma patients, and early recognition is essential to limit fatalities. There is a need for a wearable sensor system for prehospital settings that can detect and monitor bleeding in the abdomen (hemoperitoneum). This study evaluates the potential for microwave technology to fill that gap. A simple prototype of a wearable microwave sensor was constructed using eight antennas. A realistic porcine model of hemoperitoneum was developed using anesthetized pigs. Ten animals were measured at healthy state and at two sizes of bleeding. Statistical tests and a machine learning method were used to evaluate blood detection sensitivity. All subjects presented similar changes due to accumulation of blood, which dampened the microwave signal ([Formula: see text]). The machine learning analysis yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.93, showing 100% sensitivity at 90% specificity. Large inter-individual variability of the healthy state signal complicated differentiation of bleedings from healthy state. A wearable microwave instrument has potential for accurate detection and monitoring of hemoperitoneum, with automated analysis making the instrument easy-to-use. Future hardware development is necessary to suppress measurement system variability and enable detection of smaller bleedings.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34853326 PMCID: PMC8636634 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02008-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Ultrasound image showing hemoperitoneum in the right upper quadrant of a pig. The two white thin arrows (a) show accumulated blood around the liver. The thick white arrow (b) is the tip of the liver and the two ribs are marked with “R”.
Characteristics of study population. All the hybrid pigs () originated from purebred Duroc (DD) boars and crossbred Landrace Yorkshire (LY) sows, and were approximately four months old. The asterisk indicates a missing data point (measurement not recorded).
| Animal | Bodyweight (kg) | Circumference abdomen (cm) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 | 93 |
| 2 | 60 | 89 |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 59 | 90 |
| 5 | 61 | 95 |
| 6 | 65 | 97 |
| 7 | 72 | 94 |
| 8 | 65 | 98 |
| 9 | 67 | 95 |
| 10 | 68 | 97 |
Figure 2Vital signs at baseline, 500 mL and 1000 mL hemoperitoneum. The left y-axis indicates pulse rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels and the right y-axis end tidal carbon dioxide () levels. The whiskers show the standard deviations.
Figure 3Some examples of the changes relative to baseline caused by hemoperitoneum in transmission coefficient magnitude (a) and reflection coefficient magnitude and phase (b, c). The lines show the average values across all subjects while the shaded areas show the standard deviations, with the darker shade for 500 mL and the lighter shade for 1000 mL. The solid lines at are included to more clearly see the difference from baseline.
Figure 4The average magnitude differences between baseline and 500 mL (circles) and 1000 mL (asterisks) hemoperitoneum, respectively, for all ten subjects and all symmetric pairs of transmission coefficients. The whiskers show the standard deviations.
The outcomes of the Mann–Whitney U test when comparing baseline to hemoperitoneum for different S-parameter combinations. “Mag” and “Phase” represents the use of coefficient magnitude and phase, respectively. Statistically significant values () are highlighted in bold text; unshaded rows are transmission coefficients whereas shaded rows are reflection coefficients.
Figure 5Examples ( and ) of the large baseline difference between ten subjects in relation to the changes caused by hemoperitoneum. The data from the two groups completely overlap, and hemoperitoneum cannot be visually separated from healthy state.
Figure 6Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) (a) and scatter plot (b) of the best SVM classifier for differentiating 1000 mL hemoperitoneum from baseline.
Figure 8The geometrical arrangement of the eight antennas incorporated in the wearable microwave belt. The antennas were numbered so that even antennas were on the left side and odd antennas on the right side.
Figure 7Experimental study setup. Left) Porcine model with a microwave belt (A) around the abdomen, the inserted catheter into the intraperitoneal cavity (B), ECG cable (C), and microwave cables (D). Right) Image of two of the microwave antennas (E) can be seen on the inside of the microwave belt (A).