Literature DB >> 34853100

Common elements of service delivery models that optimise quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions: a tertiary systematic review.

Joanne Bayly1,2, Anna E Bone1, Clare Ellis-Smith1, India Tunnard1, Shuja Yaqub1, Deokhee Yi1, Kennedy B Nkhoma3, Amelia Cook1, Sarah Combes3,4,5, Sabrina Bajwah1, Richard Harding1, Caroline Nicholson4,5, Charles Normand1,6, Shalini Ahuja7, Pamela Turrillas1, Yoshiyuki Kizawa8, Tatsuya Morita9, Nanako Nishiyama10, Satoru Tsuneto11, Paul Ong12, Irene J Higginson1, Catherine J Evans1,13, Matthew Maddocks14.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health and social care services worldwide need to support ageing populations to live well with advanced progressive conditions while adapting to functional decline and finitude. We aimed to identify and map common elements of effective geriatric and palliative care services and consider their scalability and generalisability to high, middle and low-income countries.
METHODS: Tertiary systematic review (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Embase, January 2000-October 2019) of studies in geriatric or palliative care that demonstrated improved quality of life and/or health service use outcomes among older people with advanced progressive conditions. Using frameworks for health system analysis, service elements were identified. We used a staged, iterative process to develop a 'common components' logic model and consulted experts in geriatric or palliative care from high, middle and low-income countries on its scalability.
RESULTS: 78 studies (59 geriatric and 19 palliative) spanning all WHO regions were included. Data were available from 17 739 participants. Nearly half the studies recruited patients with heart failure (n=36) and one-third recruited patients with mixed diagnoses (n=26). Common service elements (≥80% of studies) included collaborative working, ongoing assessment, active patient participation, patient/family education and patient self-management. Effective services incorporated patient engagement, patient goal-driven care and the centrality of patient needs. Stakeholders (n=20) emphasised that wider implementation of such services would require access to skilled, multidisciplinary teams with sufficient resource to meet patients' needs. Identified barriers to scalability included the political and societal will to invest in and prioritise palliative and geriatric care for older people, alongside geographical and socioeconomic factors.
CONCLUSION: Our logic model combines elements of effective services to achieve optimal quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions. The model transcends current best practice in geriatric and palliative care and applies across the care continuum, from prevention of functional decline to end-of-life care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020150252. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  geriatric medicine; health policy; organisation of health services; palliative care; quality in health care

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34853100      PMCID: PMC8638152          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  37 in total

1.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Racial/ethnic disparities in hospice care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lilian Liou Cohen
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dio Kavalieratos; Jennifer Corbelli; Di Zhang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Natalie C Ernecoff; Janel Hanmer; Zachariah P Hoydich; Dara Z Ikejiani; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Camilla Zimmermann; Sally C Morton; Robert M Arnold; Lucas Heller; Yael Schenker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The impact of specialized palliative care on cancer patients' health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Angelos P Kassianos; Myria Ioannou; Marianna Koutsantoni; Haris Charalambous
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  COVID-19: Implications for the Support of People with Social Care Needs in England.

Authors:  Adelina Comas-Herrera; Jose-Luis Fernandez; Ruth Hancock; Chris Hatton; Martin Knapp; David McDaid; Juliette Malley; Gerald Wistow; Raphael Wittenberg
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 6.  Home- and Community-Based Occupational Therapy Improves Functioning in Frail Older People: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leen De Coninck; Geertruida E Bekkering; Leen Bouckaert; Anja Declercq; Maud J L Graff; Bert Aertgeerts
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Early, integrated palliative rehabilitation improves quality of life of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer: The Pal-Rehab randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lise Nottelmann; Mogens Groenvold; Tove Bahn Vejlgaard; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Lars Henrik Jensen
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications--a discussion paper.

Authors:  Dennis L Kodner; Cor Spreeuwenberg
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 9.  Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Pim P Valentijn; Jotheeswaran A Thiyagarajan; Islene Araujo de Carvalho
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Acute care for elders components of acute geriatric unit care: systematic descriptive review.

Authors:  Mary T Fox; Souraya Sidani; Malini Persaud; Deborah Tregunno; Ilo Maimets; Dina Brooks; Kelly O'Brien
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 7.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.