Literature DB >> 34850358

The lrd package: An R package and Shiny application for processing lexical data.

Nicholas P Maxwell1, Mark J Huff2, Erin M Buchanan3.   

Abstract

Recall testing is a common assessment to gauge memory retrieval. Responses from these tests can be analyzed in several ways; however, the output generated from a recall study typically requires manual coding that can be time intensive and error-prone before analyses can be conducted. To address this issue, this article introduces lrd (Lexical Response Data), a set of open-source tools for quickly and accurately processing lexical response data that can be used either from the R command line or through an R Shiny graphical user interface. First, we provide an overview of this package and include a step-by-step user guide for processing both cued- and free-recall responses. For validation of lrd, we used lrd to recode output from cued, free, and sentence-recall studies with large samples and examined whether the results replicated using lrd-scored data. We then assessed the inter-rater reliability and sensitivity and specificity of the scoring algorithm relative to human-coded data. Overall, lrd is highly reliable and shows excellent sensitivity and specificity, indicating that recall data processed using this package are remarkably consistent with data processed by a human coder.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cued recall; Free recall; Lexical retrieval; Memory; Recall processing; Recall scoring

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34850358     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01718-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  18 in total

1.  Age dissociates recency and lag recency effects in free recall.

Authors:  Michael J Kahana; Marc W Howard; Franklin Zaromb; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Amy Beth Warriner; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-09

3.  Autoscore: An open-source automated tool for scoring listener perception of speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Sarah E Yoho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The "Small World of Words" English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words.

Authors:  Simon De Deyne; Danielle J Navarro; Amy Perfors; Marc Brysbaert; Gert Storms
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

5.  Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Paweł Mandera; Samantha F McCormick; Emmanuel Keuleers
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-04

6.  LAB: Linguistic Annotated Bibliography - a searchable portal for normed database information.

Authors:  Erin M Buchanan; K D Valentine; Nicholas P Maxwell
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-08

7.  The semantic priming project.

Authors:  Keith A Hutchison; David A Balota; James H Neely; Michael J Cortese; Emily R Cohen-Shikora; Chi-Shing Tse; Melvin J Yap; Jesse J Bengson; Dale Niemeyer; Erin Buchanan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-12

8.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

9.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.