S A Koerber1, C A Fink1, K Dendl2,3, D Schmitt2, G Niegisch4, E Mamlins2, F L Giesel5. 1. Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. 2. Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. 4. Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. 5. Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. frederik.giesel@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local treatment of the primary or metastatic sites in urologic malignancies is promising when compared to systemic therapy alone, leading to the definition of a potentially curative oligometastatic state. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of imaging modalities regarding local and metastatic tumor sites in urologic cancers. METHODS: Review of comparative trials addressing quality criteria of imaging modalities. RESULTS: Depending on primary tumor and metastatic site, conventional imaging modalities such as computer tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy still represent the standard of care in Germany. Due to superior quality criteria, hybrid-imaging techniques were widely adopted for oncological staging and particular due to the new PSMA-ligand (PSMA-PET/CT) in prostate cancer imaging. The development of new radioisotopes as well as their clinical application remains a focus of current research. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality diagnostic imaging modalities lay the groundwork for a precise definition of an oligometastatic state. By enabling treatment of the entire tumor burden, a delay of systemic therapy, longer progression-free survival, or even curative treatment may become achievable.
BACKGROUND: Local treatment of the primary or metastatic sites in urologic malignancies is promising when compared to systemic therapy alone, leading to the definition of a potentially curative oligometastatic state. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of imaging modalities regarding local and metastatic tumor sites in urologic cancers. METHODS: Review of comparative trials addressing quality criteria of imaging modalities. RESULTS: Depending on primary tumor and metastatic site, conventional imaging modalities such as computer tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy still represent the standard of care in Germany. Due to superior quality criteria, hybrid-imaging techniques were widely adopted for oncological staging and particular due to the new PSMA-ligand (PSMA-PET/CT) in prostate cancer imaging. The development of new radioisotopes as well as their clinical application remains a focus of current research. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality diagnostic imaging modalities lay the groundwork for a precise definition of an oligometastatic state. By enabling treatment of the entire tumor burden, a delay of systemic therapy, longer progression-free survival, or even curative treatment may become achievable.
Authors: David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura Journal: Radiographics Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Helle D Zacho; Julie B Nielsen; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Uwe Haberkorn; Nandita deSouza; Katja De Paepe; Katja Dettmann; Niels C Langkilde; Christian Haarmark; Rune V Fisker; Dennis T Arp; Jesper Carl; Jørgen B Jensen; Lars J Petersen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A M Hövels; R A M Heesakkers; E M Adang; G J Jager; S Strum; Y L Hoogeveen; J L Severens; J O Barentsz Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Anwar R Padhani; Frederic E Lecouvet; Nina Tunariu; Dow-Mu Koh; Frederik De Keyzer; David J Collins; Evis Sala; Heinz Peter Schlemmer; Giuseppe Petralia; H Alberto Vargas; Stefano Fanti; H Bertrand Tombal; Johann de Bono Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Anna Barnes; Roberto Alonzi; Matthew Blackledge; Geoff Charles-Edwards; David J Collins; Gary Cook; Glynn Coutts; Vicky Goh; Martin Graves; Charles Kelly; Dow-Mu Koh; Hazel McCallum; Marc E Miquel; James O'Connor; Anwar Padhani; Rachel Pearson; Andrew Priest; Andrea Rockall; James Stirling; Stuart Taylor; Nina Tunariu; Jan van der Meulen; Darren Walls; Jessica Winfield; Shonit Punwani Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.039