Literature DB >> 34849985

Effects of corn processing and cattle size on total tract digestion and energy and nitrogen balance.

Emily A Petzel1, Subash Acharya1, Joshua M Zeltwanger1, Eric A Bailey1, Derek W Brake1.   

Abstract

This study used 18 calves (295 ± 29 kg) and 18 yearlings (521 ± 29 kg) fed whole, cracked, or steam-flaked corn (SFC) to evaluate nutrient digestion and energy balance across different types of processed corn and sizes of cattle. Cattle were fed a diet comprised of 75% corn (dry matter [DM]-basis) from whole, cracked, or SFC to 2.5-times maintenance energy requirements. Subsequently, cattle were placed in individual stanchions, and urine and feces were collected together with measures of gas production via indirect calorimetry. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. There was no interaction between corn processing and cattle size (P ≥ 0.40). Time spent ruminating (min/d) and rumination rate (min/kg DM intake [DMI]) were not affected by corn processing or cattle size. The eating rate (min/kg DMI) was faster (P < 0.01) for yearlings compared with calves. Total tract starch digestion was greatest (P = 0.01) for cattle fed SFC (97.5%), intermediate in cattle fed cracked (92.4%), and least in cattle fed whole corn (89.5%). Dietary digestible energy and metabolizable energy (Mcal/kg DMI) were greater (P ≤ 0.05) for cattle fed SFC compared with cracked or whole. A greater proportion of digestible energy was lost to heat production (P = 0.01) in cattle fed whole corn compared with cracked and tended to be greater (P = 0.08) in cattle fed SFC than cracked. Conversion of digestible energy to metabolizable energy in this study was more closely related to a dynamic model used to estimate metabolizable energy of feeds to dairy cows than to a linear model used to predict metabolizable energy of feeds to beef cattle. If library estimates of net energy for maintenance are correct, then retained energy (Mcal/d) should have been similar between each type of processed corn; however, retained energy was greater (P < 0.01) for cattle fed cracked compared with whole corn and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) compared with SFC. Yet, observed amounts of net energy based on measures of retained energy were not different (P ≥ 0.60) between cracked and SFC. Nitrogen balance was not affected (P ≥ 0.30) by corn processing or cattle size, although cattle fed cracked had numerically greater (P ≤ 035) N retention. These data indicate that physical processing of corn provides greater net energy to cattle in comparison to whole corn.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calorie; cattle; corn processing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34849985      PMCID: PMC8668174          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  31 in total

1.  Improved enzymatic method to measure processing effects and starch availability in sorghum grain.

Authors:  Y Xiong; S J Bartle; R L Preston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of corn processing method and corn wet distillers grains plus solubles inclusion level in finishing steers.

Authors:  M E Corrigan; G E Erickson; T J Klopfenstein; M K Luebbe; K J Vander Pol; N F Meyer; C D Buckner; S J Vanness; K J Hanford
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effect of processing on digestion and utilization of cereals by ruminants.

Authors:  E R Orskov
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.297

4.  Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: The 2015 New Mexico State and Texas Tech University survey.

Authors:  K L Samuelson; M E Hubbert; M L Galyean; C A Löest
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Influence of varying protein and starch degradabilities on performance of lactating cows.

Authors:  R Herrera-Saldana; J T Huber
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Technical note: Validation of a behavior-monitoring collar's precision and accuracy to measure rumination, feeding, and resting time of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  L N Grinter; M R Campler; J H C Costa
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?1.

Authors:  Emily A Petzel; Evan C Titgemeyer; Alexander J Smart; Kristin E Hales; Andrew P Foote; Subash Acharya; Eric A Bailey; Jeffrey E Held; Derek W Brake
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Energy costs of feeding excess protein from corn-based by-products to finishing cattle.

Authors:  Jenny S Jennings; Beverly E Meyer; Pablo J Guiroy; N Andy Cole
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.