Literature DB >> 30772028

Technical note: Validation of a behavior-monitoring collar's precision and accuracy to measure rumination, feeding, and resting time of lactating dairy cows.

L N Grinter1, M R Campler1, J H C Costa2.   

Abstract

Precision dairy technology is important because of the possibility to continuously and accurately measure behavior, biometrics, and productivity on commercial and research dairy farms by an automated method with minimal human intervention. The behavior-monitoring collar (BMC) used in this study is a commercially available precision dairy technology (MooMonitor+, Dairymaster, Co. Kerry, Ireland), designed to measure rumination, heat detection, feeding, and resting behavior of dairy cows. The study objective was to compare cow behavior measured by the BMC with visual observations. Twenty-four lactating, group-housed, Holstein dairy cows (mean ± standard deviation; days in milk: 196 ± 101; parity: 2.0 ± 1.1; milk yield: 40.0 ± 9.8 kg/d) were randomly selected for observation at the University of Kentucky's research dairy farm, Lexington). Behavior-monitoring collars were assigned to cows as per farm protocol. Each cow was observed for 240 min within 1 d (0700 to 0900 h, and 1900 to 2100 h). Recordings of rumination, feeding, and resting time (min) by the BMC were compared with visual observation using Pearson correlation, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots for validation of precision and accuracy. Data from the BMC were considered precise if the correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination were high (>0.70), and mean bias from the Bland-Altman plots included zero with the 95% interval of agreement. The BMC was considered accurate if the slope from the linear regressions did not differ significantly from 1, and the CCC (ρc) were at least moderate (>0.90). We found very high Pearson correlation coefficients (0.99, 0.93, and 0.94) and coefficients of determination (0.97, 0.85, and 0.88) for rumination, feeding, and resting, respectively. Bland-Altman plots were acceptable; the plots did not show any bias. The Bland-Altman mean differences ± standard deviation (BMC - observation) were -7.57 ± 6.31, 15.81 ± 11.84, and -13.03 ± 9.37 min, respectively. The Bland-Altman plot's 95% interval of agreement encompassed 100% of the observations of resting time, and all but one cow's observations for both rumination and feeding time. The slope of the linear regression, however, was different than 1 for all behaviors, and rumination was the only behavior with moderate CCC. In summary, this study validates the high precision of rumination, resting, and feeding behaviors measured by a BMC in lactating dairy cows.
Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MooMonitor+; accelerometer; precision dairy farming

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30772028     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Effects of corn processing and cattle size on total tract digestion and energy and nitrogen balance.

Authors:  Emily A Petzel; Subash Acharya; Joshua M Zeltwanger; Eric A Bailey; Derek W Brake
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  A Survey of Dairy Cattle Behavior in Different Barns in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Lovarelli; Alberto Finzi; Gabriele Mattachini; Elisabetta Riva
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Setup, Test and Validation of a UHF RFID System for Monitoring Feeding Behaviour of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Felix Adrion; Markus Keller; Giulia Bianca Bozzolini; Christina Umstatter
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Monitoring and Improving the Metabolic Health of Dairy Cows during the Transition Period.

Authors:  Luciano S Caixeta; Bobwealth O Omontese
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Yaneth Gómez; Greta V Berteselli; Emanuela Dalla Costa; Elisabetta Canali; Jarkko K Niemi; Pol Llonch; Matti Pastell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.