| Literature DB >> 34848683 |
Min Wang1, Ruirui Wang1, Luis Alejandro Jose Mur2, Jianyun Ruan3, Qirong Shen1, Shiwei Guo4.
Abstract
Silicon (Si), the second most abundant element in Earth's crust, exerts beneficial effects on the growth and productivity of a variety of plant species under various environmental conditions. However, the benefits of Si and its importance to plants are controversial due to differences among the species, genotypes, and the environmental conditions. Although Si has been widely reported to alleviate plant drought stress in both the Si-accumulating and nonaccumulating plants, the underlying mechanisms through which Si improves plant water status and maintains water balance remain unclear. The aim of this review is to summarize the morphoanatomical, physiological, biochemical, and molecular processes that are involved in plant water status that are regulated by Si in response to drought stress, especially the integrated modulation of Si-triggered drought stress responses in Si accumulators and intermediate- and excluder-type plants. The key mechanisms influencing the ability of Si to mitigate the effects of drought stress include enhancing water uptake and transport, regulating stomatal behavior and transpirational water loss, accumulating solutes and osmoregulatory substances, and inducing plant defense- associated with signaling events, consequently maintaining whole-plant water balance. This study evaluates the ability of Si to maintain water balance under drought stress conditions and suggests future research that is needed to implement the use of Si in agriculture. Considering the complex relationships between Si and different plant species, genotypes, and the environment, detailed studies are needed to understand the interactions between Si and plant responses under stress conditions.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34848683 PMCID: PMC8633297 DOI: 10.1038/s41438-021-00681-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hortic Res ISSN: 2052-7276 Impact factor: 6.793
Fig. 1Beneficial effects of silicon (Si) on the growth and development of plants under drought stress.
a Plant growth and yield production in the absence of Si application (-Si). Seed germination, root growth, shoot growth, and crop yields are suppressed by drought without Si application. b Plant growth and yield production in the presence of Si application (+Si). c The beneficial effects of Si under drought stress include stimulating seed germination (1) and increasing both root (2) and shoot growth (3), thus increasing plant biomass and yield (4) under drought stress
Fig. 2Water uptake increases in response to Si application under drought stress conditions.
a Silicon (Si) application acts via the following mechanisms: (1) increasing the root/shoot ratio; (2) inducing root endodermal silicification and suberization; (3) enhancing the root driving force; (4) improving root hydraulic conductance (Lp); (5) increasing aquaporin (AQP) activity; and (6) maintaining nutrient balance. b Root hydraulic conductance and aquaporins are regulated by Si under drought stress. Si application improves root Lp by inhibiting reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production and increases AQP activity by reducing ROS production and membrane damage, thus improving water uptake
Fig. 3Si influences leaf transpiration under drought stress.
a Leaf transpiration can be reduced by Si application under drought stress via (1) physical blockade of cuticular transpiration via cuticle layer thickening caused by silica deposits and via (2) regulation of stomatal movement by turgor loss of guard cells and by changes in the physical and mechanical properties of cell walls. b In contrast, Si application increased the leaf water potential (3) and water uptake (4), thus enhancing leaf xylem sap flow and transpiration under drought stress conditions. In addition, Si has also been reported to have no effect on leaf transpiration in some cases
Morphoanatomical, physiological, biochemical, and molecular processes involved in Si alleviation of drought stress in plants
| Process | Resistance mechanism | Plant species | Response | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomato ( | (+) 22~39% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | (+) 13~37% | [ | ||
| Maize ( | (NS) | [ | ||
| Lentil ( | (+) 16~55% | [ | ||
| Rice ( | (+) 8~10% | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | Root dry weight (+) 23% | [ | ||
| Sunflower ( | Root dry weight (NS) | [ | ||
| Soybean ( | Root dry weight (+) 34% | [ | ||
| Canola ( | Root dry weight (+) 47% | [ | ||
| Rice ( | Total root length (+) 40~65% Root surface area (+) 19~38% Root volume (+) 22~40% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | Root dry weight (+) 74% [53] (+) 93% [59] (+) 110% [66] Root diameter (+) 16% [66] | [ | ||
| Chickpea ( | Root dry weight (NS) | [ | ||
| Cucumber ( | Root surface area (+) 39% Root mean diameter (+) 18% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | Root dry weight (NS) | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | Shoot dry weight (+) 18% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | Shoot dry weight (+) 42% | [ | ||
| Soybean ( | Shoot dry weight (+) 26% | [ | ||
| Canola ( | Shoot dry weight (+) 76% | [ | ||
| Rice ( | Shoot weight (+) 97-103% [48] Plant height (+) 4~9% [50] | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | Shoot dry weight (+) 41% [53] (+) 71% [59] (+) 78% [66] | [ | ||
| Cucumber ( | Shoot dry weight (+) 32% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | Plant height (NS) | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | (+) 9% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | (NS) | [ | ||
| Soybean ( | (+) 7% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | (+) 4% [53] (NS) [59,66] | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | Root osmotic adjustment (+) 134% Leaf osmotic adjustment (+) 63% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | Root xylem osmotic adjustment (NS) [31] Leaf osmotic adjustment (+) 15% Root osmotic adjustment (+) 7% [53] | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | Root osmotic adjustment (+) 15% | [ | ||
| Cucumber ( | Root xylem osmotic adjustment (+) 39% | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | (+) 176% | [ | ||
| Canola ( | (+) 20% | [ | ||
| Rice ( | (+) 119% | [ | ||
| Maize ( | (+) 30% | [ | ||
| Alfalfa ( | (+) 20~36% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | (NS) | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | (+) 260% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | (+) 59% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | (+) 143% | [ | ||
| Canola ( | (+) 61% | [ | ||
| Rice ( | (+) 37% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | (+) 17% [91] (+) 118% [110] | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | (+) 17~27% [28] | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | (+) 13% [31] (+) 16% [110] | [ | ||
| Rice ( | (+) 15% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | (+) 15% [29] (+) 40% [109] | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | Root hydraulic conductance (+) 375% | [ | ||
| Cucumber ( | Root hydraulic conductance (+) 160% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | Whole-plant hydraulic conductance (+) 52% [31] Root hydraulic conductance (+) 19% [91] | [ | ||
| Upland rice ( | (+) 32% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | (+) 55% | [ | ||
| Soybean ( | (+) 29% | [ | ||
| Rice ( | (+) 19% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | (+) 24% [31] (+) 25% [91] | [ | ||
| Alfalfa ( | (+) 25-52% | [ | ||
| Maize ( | (−) 30% [93] (−) 33~35% [102] | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | Root SOD (+) 22% CAT (+) 9% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | Root SOD (+) 74% CAT (+) 65% | [ | ||
| Sunflower ( | Shoots CAT (+) 20% | [ | ||
| Canola ( | Leaf SOD (+) 116% POD (+) 175% Root SOD (+) 20% POD (+) 27% | [ | ||
| Cucumber ( | Leaf GPX (+) 54% SOD (+) 21% | [ | ||
| Chickpea ( | Shoot SOD (NS) CAT (+) 106% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | Root SOD (+)20% CAT (+) 27% APX (NS) | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | Root AsA (+) 62% GSH (+) 44% | [ | ||
| Sunflower ( | Shoot (+) 19% | [ | ||
| Chickpea ( | Shoot (+) 18% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | Root H2O2 (−) 30% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | Root H2O2 (−) 36~39% MDA (−) 16~45% O2• −(−) 15%~23% | [ | ||
| Sunflower ( | Shoot H2O2 (−) 25% MDA (−) 11% | [ | ||
| Canola ( | Leaf H2O2 (−) 9% MDA (−) 39% Root H2O2 (−) 47% MDA (−) 57% | [ | ||
| Cucumber ( | Leaf H2O2 (−) 18% [69]~19% [68] MDA (−) 24% [69]~52% [68] Root H2O2 (−)23% MDA (−) 22% | [ | ||
| Chickpea ( | Shoot H2O2 (−) 42% MDA (−) 11% LOX (−) 8% | [ | ||
| Sorghum ( | Root H2O2 (−) 50% | [ | ||
| Tomato ( | [ | |||
| Cucumber ( | [ | |||
| Sorghum ( | [ | |||
| Sorghum ( | Leaf PAs (+) 80% Root PAs (+) 67% | [ | ||
| Soybean ( | Gibberellins (GAs) (+) 53% JA (−) 38% SA (−) 29% | [ | ||
| Barley ( | ABA ( +) 97% Phaseic acid (+) 74% Dehydro-phaseic acid (DPA) (+) 57% Cytokinin Ip (+) 76% | [ | ||
| Wheat ( | [ |
Positive (+), negative (−), and no effect (NS no significant difference) of silicon (Si) on plant drought resistance. The response data were calculated as follows: (Si supply—without Si supply)/without Si supply×100% (under drought stress)
Fig. 4Key mechanisms involved in Si-triggered drought stress in plants.
Plant water relations regulated by Si under drought stress conditions include (1) activation of antioxidant systems, (2) stimulation of gene expression and defense responses, (3) adjustment of osmotic processes and maintenance of homeostasis, (4) increases in nutrient uptake and maintenance of mineral balance, (5) regulation of photosynthesis and gas exchange, and (6) improvements in plant growth and water uptake