Literature DB >> 18987216

The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine.

Rebecca K Vandeleur1, Gwenda Mayo, Megan C Shelden, Matthew Gilliham, Brent N Kaiser, Stephen D Tyerman.   

Abstract

We report physiological and anatomical characteristics of water transport across roots grown in soil of two cultivars of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) differing in response to water stress (Grenache, isohydric; Chardonnay, anisohydric). Both cultivars have similar root hydraulic conductances (Lo; normalized to root dry weight) that change diurnally. There is a positive correlation between Lo and transpiration. Under water stress, both cultivars have reduced minimum daily Lo (predawn) attributed to the development of apoplastic barriers. Water-stressed and well-watered Chardonnay had the same diurnal change in amplitude of Lo, while water-stressed Grenache showed a reduction in daily amplitude compared with well-watered plants. Hydraulic conductivity of root cortex cells (Lpcell) doubles in Chardonnay but remains unchanged in Grenache. Of the two most highly expressed plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) aquaporins in roots (VvPIP1;1 and VvPIP2;2), only VvPIP2;2 functions as a water channel in Xenopus laevis oocytes. VvPIP1;1 interacts with VvPIP2;2 to induce 3-fold higher water permeability. These two aquaporins are colocated in the root from in situ hybridization and immunolocalization of VvPIP1 and VvPIP2 subfamily members. They occur in root tip, exodermis, root cortex (detected up to 30 mm), and stele. VvPIP2;2 mRNA does not change diurnally or with water stress, in contrast to VvPIP1;1, in which expression reflects the differences in Lo and Lpcell between cultivars in their responses to water stress and rewatering. VvPIP1;1 may regulate water transport across roots such that transpirational demand is matched by root water transport capacity. This occurs on a diurnal basis and in response to water stress that corresponds to the difference in drought tolerance between the cultivars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18987216      PMCID: PMC2613730          DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.128645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  59 in total

1.  Diurnal variations in hydraulic conductivity and root pressure can be correlated with the expression of putative aquaporins in the roots of lotus japonicus

Authors: 
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Subunit stoichiometry of a mammalian K+ channel determined by construction of multimeric cDNAs.

Authors:  E R Liman; J Tytgat; P Hess
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Identification of grapevine aquaporins and expression analysis in developing berries.

Authors:  Romain Fouquet; Céline Léon; Nathalie Ollat; François Barrieu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Aquaporins and unloading of phloem-imported water in coats of developing bean seeds.

Authors:  Yuchan Zhou; Nathan Setz; Christa Niemietz; Hongxia Qu; Christina E Offler; Stephen D Tyerman; John W Patrick
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Aquaporin isoforms responsive to salt and water stresses and phytohormones in radish seedlings.

Authors:  Shinobu Suga; Setsuko Komatsu; Masayoshi Maeshima
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Drought, abscisic acid and transpiration rate effects on the regulation of PIP aquaporin gene expression and abundance in Phaseolus vulgaris plants.

Authors:  Ricardo Aroca; Antonio Ferrante; Paolo Vernieri; Maarten J Chrispeels
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Cell-specific expression of the mercury-insensitive plasma-membrane aquaporin NtAQP1 from Nicotiana tabacum.

Authors:  B Otto; R Kaldenhoff
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins from maize cluster in two sequence subgroups with differential aquaporin activity.

Authors:  F Chaumont; F Barrieu; R Jung; M J Chrispeels
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Whole-plant hydraulic resistance and vulnerability segmentation in Acer saccharinum.

Authors:  M Tsuda; M T Tyree
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Expression of the Vicia faba VfPIP1 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana plants improves their drought resistance.

Authors:  Xiang-Huan Cui; Fu-Shun Hao; Hui Chen; Jia Chen; Xue-Chen Wang
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  107 in total

1.  Recovery from water stress affects grape leaf petiole transcriptome.

Authors:  Irene Perrone; Chiara Pagliarani; Claudio Lovisolo; Walter Chitarra; Federica Roman; Andrea Schubert
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Transcriptome response to embolism formation in stems of Populus trichocarpa provides insight into signaling and the biology of refilling.

Authors:  Francesca Secchi; Matthew E Gilbert; Maciej A Zwieniecki
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Intracellular pH sensing is altered by plasma membrane PIP aquaporin co-expression.

Authors:  Jorge Bellati; Karina Alleva; Gabriela Soto; Victoria Vitali; Cintia Jozefkowicz; Gabriela Amodeo
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 4.  Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data.

Authors:  M M Chaves; O Zarrouk; R Francisco; J M Costa; T Santos; A P Regalado; M L Rodrigues; C M Lopes
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Heteromerization of PIP aquaporins affects their intrinsic permeability.

Authors:  Agustín Yaneff; Lorena Sigaut; Mercedes Marquez; Karina Alleva; Lía Isabel Pietrasanta; Gabriela Amodeo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Involvement of rose aquaporin RhPIP1;1 in ethylene-regulated petal expansion through interaction with RhPIP2;1.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Xia Yin; Lei Wang; Ji Tian; Ruoyun Yang; Daofeng Liu; Zhenhao Yu; Nan Ma; Junping Gao
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Comparative analysis of transcriptome in two wheat genotypes with contrasting levels of drought tolerance.

Authors:  Jitendra Kumar; Samatha Gunapati; Shahryar F Kianian; Sudhir P Singh
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.356

8.  Vascular function in grape berries across development and its relevance to apparent hydraulic isolation.

Authors:  Brendan Choat; Greg A Gambetta; Kenneth A Shackel; Mark A Matthews
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Water uptake along the length of grapevine fine roots: developmental anatomy, tissue-specific aquaporin expression, and pathways of water transport.

Authors:  Gregory A Gambetta; Jiong Fei; Thomas L Rost; Thorsten Knipfer; Mark A Matthews; Ken A Shackel; M Andrew Walker; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Rapid changes in root hydraulic conductivity and aquaporin expression in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to shoot removal - xylem tension as a possible signal.

Authors:  Delong Meng; Marc Walsh; Wieland Fricke
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.