Literature DB >> 34847999

Workers' compensation claim counts and rates by injury event/exposure among state-insured private employers in Ohio, 2007-2017.

Steven J Wurzelbacher1, Alysha R Meyers2, Michael P Lampl3, P Timothy Bushnell4, Stephen J Bertke5, David C Robins6, Chih-Yu Tseng7, Steven J Naber8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed workers' compensation (WC) claims among private employers insured by the Ohio state-based WC carrier to identify high-risk industries by detailed cause of injury.
METHODS: A machine learning algorithm was used to code each claim by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) event/exposure. The codes assigned to lost-time (LT) claims with lower algorithm probabilities of accurate classification or those LT claims with high costs were manually reviewed. WC data were linked with the state's unemployment insurance (UI) data to identify the employer's industry and number of employees. BLS data on hours worked per employee were used to estimate full-time equivalents (FTE) and calculate rates of WC claims per 100 FTE.
RESULTS: 140,780 LT claims and 633,373 medical-only claims were analyzed. Although counts and rates of LT WC claims declined from 2007 to 2017, the shares of leading LT injury event/exposures remained largely unchanged. LT claims due to Overexertion and Bodily Reaction (33.0%) were most common, followed by Falls, Slips, and Trips (31.4%), Contact with Objects and Equipment (22.5%), Transportation Incidents (7.0%), Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments (2.8%), Violence and Other Injuries by Persons or Animals (2.5%), and Fires and Explosions (0.4%). These findings are consistent with other reported data. The proportions of injury event/exposures varied by industry, and high-risk industries were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Injuries have been reduced, but prevention challenges remain in certain industries. Available evidence on intervention effectiveness was summarized and mapped to the analysis results to demonstrate how the results can guide prevention efforts. Practical Applications: Employers, safety/health practitioners, researchers, WC insurers, and bureaus can use these data and machine learning methods to understand industry differences in the level and mix of risks, as well as industry trends, and to tailor safety, health, and disability prevention services and research. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Injury cause; Insurance; Machine learning; Prevention; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34847999      PMCID: PMC9026720          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Safety Res        ISSN: 0022-4375


  68 in total

1.  Disease and injury among veterinarians.

Authors:  J Jeyaretnam; H Jones; M Phillips
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Effectiveness of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear program for reducing slipping-related injuries in food service workers: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bell; James W Collins; Sharon Chiou
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Why most workers with occupational repetitive trauma do not file for workers' compensation.

Authors:  K D Rosenman; J C Gardiner; J Wang; J Biddle; A Hogan; M J Reilly; K Roberts; E Welch
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  An evaluation of a "best practices" musculoskeletal injury prevention program in nursing homes.

Authors:  J W Collins; L Wolf; J Bell; B Evanoff
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  The effect of ergonomic interventions in healthcare facilities on musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Kaori Fujishiro; Jean L Weaver; Catherine A Heaney; Christopher A Hamrick; William S Marras
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 6.  A systematic review of occupational health and safety interventions with economic analyses.

Authors:  Emile Tompa; Roman Dolinschi; Claire de Oliveira; Emma Irvin
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Development of methods for using workers' compensation data for surveillance and prevention of occupational injuries among State-insured private employers in Ohio.

Authors:  Steven J Wurzelbacher; Ibraheem S Al-Tarawneh; Alysha R Meyers; P Timothy Bushnell; Michael P Lampl; David C Robins; Chih-Yu Tseng; Chia Wei; Stephen J Bertke; Jill A Raudabaugh; Thomas M Haviland; Teresa M Schnorr
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  The impact of a crash prevention program in a large law enforcement agency.

Authors:  Hope M Tiesman; Melody Gwilliam; Jeff Rojek; Scott Hendricks; Brian Montgomery; Geoff Alpert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  A prospective study of floor surface, shoes, floor cleaning and slipping in US limited-service restaurant workers.

Authors:  Santosh K Verma; Wen Ruey Chang; Theodore K Courtney; David A Lombardi; Yueng-Hsiang Huang; Melanye J Brennan; Murray A Mittleman; James H Ware; Melissa J Perry
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Truck Seat Intervention: Part 2-Associations Between Whole-Body Vibration Exposures and Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Kim; Monica Zigman; Jack T Dennerlein; Peter W Johnson
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.179

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Impact of a State-Based Workers' Compensation Insurer's Risk Control Services on Employer Claim Frequency and Cost Rates.

Authors:  Steven J Wurzelbacher; Stephen J Bertke; Michael P Lampl; P Timothy Bushnell; David C Robins; Steven J Naber; Libby L Moore
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.306

2.  Lessons learned from Ohio workers' compensation claims to mitigate hazards in the landscaping services industry.

Authors:  Barbara M Alexander; Steven J Wurzelbacher; Rachel J Zeiler; Steven J Naber
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.079

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.