Literature DB >> 30519704

Effectiveness of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear program for reducing slipping-related injuries in food service workers: a cluster randomized trial.

Jennifer L Bell1, James W Collins, Sharon Chiou.   

Abstract

Objective This study evaluated the effectiveness of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear (SRF) program in preventing workers' compensation injury claims caused by slipping on wet or greasy floors. Methods The study population was a dynamic cohort of food service workers from 226 school districts' kindergarten through 12th grade food service operations. A two-arm cluster randomized controlled study design was implemented, with school districts randomized to the intervention group receiving SRF. Data were analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle. Logistic regression was used to analyze dichotomous response data (injured based on workers' compensation injury claims data, or not injured, for each month worked). Changes in slipping injury rates from baseline to post-intervention follow-up periods were compared between treatment groups. Results The probability of a slipping injury was reduced significantly in the intervention group, from a baseline measure of 3.54 slipping injuries per 10 000 worker-months to 1.18 slipping injuries per 10 000 worker-months in the follow-up period [adjusted odds ratio (OR adj) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.63]. In the control group, slipping injuries were 2.01 per 10 000 worker-months in the baseline, and 2.30 per 10 000 worker-months in the follow-up. The interaction between treatment group and time period (baseline or follow-up) indicated that the decline seen in the intervention group was significantly different than the increase seen in the control group (OR adj0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.74, adjusted for age >55 years). Conclusions This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of a no-cost-to-workers SRF program in reducing slipping-related workers' compensation injury claims in food service workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30519704     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Footwear on Occupational Task Performance and Musculoskeletal Injury Risk: A Scoping Review to Inform Tactical Footwear.

Authors:  Robin Orr; Danny Maupin; Robert Palmer; Elisa F D Canetti; Vini Simas; Ben Schram
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Workers' compensation claim counts and rates by injury event/exposure among state-insured private employers in Ohio, 2007-2017.

Authors:  Steven J Wurzelbacher; Alysha R Meyers; Michael P Lampl; P Timothy Bushnell; Stephen J Bertke; David C Robins; Chih-Yu Tseng; Steven J Naber
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2021-09-17

3.  An observational ergonomic tool for assessing the worn condition of slip-resistant shoes.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Johanna L Siegel; Sarah L Hemler; Vani H Sundaram; Arnab Chanda; Arian Iraqi; Joel M Haight; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Prediction of coefficient of friction based on footwear outsole features.

Authors:  Arian Iraqi; Natasa S Vidic; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Gait kinetics impact shoe tread wear rate.

Authors:  Sarah L Hemler; Jessica R Sider; Mark S Redfern; Kurt E Beschorner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Development and application of an innovative instrument to assess work environment factors for injury prevention in the food service industry.

Authors:  Pia Markkanen; Susan E Peters; Michael Grant; Jack T Dennerlein; Gregory R Wagner; Lisa Burke; Lorraine Wallace; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Work       Date:  2021

7.  Slip-resistant footwear reduces slips among National Health Service workers in England: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Cockayne; Caroline Fairhurst; Gillian Frost; Mark Liddle; Rachel Cunningham-Burley; Michael Zand; Catherine Hewitt; Heather M Iles-Smith; Lorraine Green; David J Torgerson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.402

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.