Literature DB >> 34847626

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-based risk prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: Ready for prime time?

Seung Mi Lee1, Won Kim2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Pregnancy; Pregnancy complications

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34847626      PMCID: PMC8755472          DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol        ISSN: 2287-2728


× No keyword cloud information.
There is a growing body of evidence that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with further development of cardiometabolic disease [1]. Pregnancy is deemed a window period to predict further metabolic or cardiovascular disease later in life. Physiological changes during pregnancy, such as circulatory volume increases, inflammatory changes, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, can present challenges to pregnant women [2]. Because of these changes, pregnancy complications can develop, and it has been reported that women who experience pregnancy complications are likely to develop further metabolic or cardiovascular disease after pregnancy [3-8]. Indeed, pregnancy is also a period of opportunity to identify women at high risk for long-term metabolic or cardiovascular disease [9]. Recently, there have been several reports on pregnancy outcomes in women with NAFLD. NAFLD has been reported to be associated with diverse pregnancy complications, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), fetal overgrowth, or hypertensive disease during pregnancy [10-13]. In this issue of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, El Jamaly et al. [14] conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the current evidence regarding maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with NAFLD. In the review of 22 studies that included 13,641 female patients with NAFLD, women with NAFLD were at increased risk of baseline diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.21–16.31), baseline hypertension (OR, 3.75; 95 CI, 2.13–6.59), gestational hypertension (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.03–3.26), and preeclampsia (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.21–16.31). Moreover, NALFD was associated with the risk of gestational diabetes (OR, 3.78; 95% CI, 2.21–6.44 for post history of gestational diabetes; OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.58–5.02 for current gestational diabetes), premature birth (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.44–2.85), large for gestational age birth (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.72–2.37), and history of prior miscarriage or abortion (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02–1.30). Overall, the authors showed that NAFDL was associated with increased risk of maternal diabetic or hypertensive complications and other adverse fetal outcomes, providing informative evidence in clinical management of women with NAFLD. The current study is the first meta-analysis that reports a correlation between NAFLD and pregnancy outcomes. However, the authors could not exclude other liver-related competing conditions (hepatitis or liver transplantation), and some of the studies analyzed did not disclose the method of NAFLD diagnosis. Nevertheless, the large sample size and the quality of the included studies support that the estimated effect from the current meta-analysis is close to the true effect. Based on the current and previous reports, a consensus can be drawn that NAFLD is a definite risk factor for several adverse pregnancy outcomes. While the traditional risk stratification system recommended by the practice guidelines can identify only a handful of pregnant women who eventually develop GDM or preeclampsia [13,15], the incorporation of NAFLD into the preexisting risk stratification model improves the predictive performance for adverse pregnancy outcomes [16]. However, whether the early identification of NAFLD in pregnant women should be routinely implemented remains controversial. The cost-effectiveness analysis should be performed first, as the confirmative diagnosis of NAFLD requires either radiological or histological examination, which may be difficult to conduct in prenatal care. The effect of NAFLD during pregnancy on the fetus is another important issue that needs to be addressed in future studies. As shown by the increased risk of GDM or fetal overgrowth in pregnant women with NAFLD, it is biologically plausible that the metabolic changes in women with NAFLD may also affect the fetus in utero. Consequently, fetal growth disturbance may be correlated with long-term cardiometabolic risk, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease, later in life [17]. Therefore, further studies are warranted to investigate the metabolic disturbance of the fetus in women with NAFLD and its impact in the neonatal, infant, and adult periods.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening?

Authors:  Naveed Sattar; Ian A Greer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

2.  The risk of pregnancy-associated hypertension in women with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Young Mi Jung; Seung Mi Lee; Subeen Hong; Ja Nam Koo; Ig Hwan Oh; Byoung Jae Kim; Sun Min Kim; Sang Youn Kim; Gyoung Min Kim; Sae Kyung Joo; Sue Shin; Errol R Norwitz; Chan-Wook Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Won Kim; Joong Shin Park
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.828

3.  Pregnancy-induced hypertension and diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes hospitalization in the year following delivery.

Authors:  David A Savitz; Valery A Danilack; Beth Elston; Heather S Lipkind
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  An association between gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term maternal cardiovascular morbidity.

Authors:  Roy Kessous; Ilana Shoham-Vardi; Gali Pariente; Michael Sherf; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction.

Authors:  Piya Chaemsaithong; Daljit Singh Sahota; Liona C Poon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Gestational diabetes mellitus and later cardiovascular disease: a Swedish population based case-control study.

Authors:  H Fadl; A Magnuson; I Östlund; S Montgomery; U Hanson; E Schwarcz
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  A Comparison of Predictive Performances between Old versus New Criteria in a Risk-Based Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Subeen Hong; Seung Mi Lee; Soo Heon Kwak; Byoung Jae Kim; Ja Nam Koo; Ig Hwan Oh; Sohee Oh; Sun Min Kim; Sue Shin; Won Kim; Sae Kyung Joo; Errol R Norwitz; Souphaphone Louangsenlath; Chan Wook Park; Jong Kwan Jun; Joong Shin Park
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.376

8.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the association with pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Hydar El Jamaly; Guy D Eslick; Martin Weltman
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2021-09-17

9.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using machine learning methods.

Authors:  Seung Mi Lee; Suhyun Hwangbo; Errol R Norwitz; Ja Nam Koo; Ig Hwan Oh; Eun Saem Choi; Young Mi Jung; Sun Min Kim; Byoung Jae Kim; Sang Youn Kim; Gyoung Min Kim; Won Kim; Sae Kyung Joo; Sue Shin; Chan-Wook Park; Taesung Park; Joong Shin Park
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2021-10-15

10.  Association of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes With Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Marc Meller Søndergaard; Mark A Hlatky; Marcia L Stefanick; Eric Vittinghoff; Gregory Nah; Matthew Allison; Alison Gemmill; Linda Van Horn; Ki Park; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Maryam Sattari; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Aladdin H Shadyab; Carolina Valdiviezo; JoAnn E Manson; Nisha I Parikh
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more
  1 in total

1.  Case Report:Pregnancy and birth in a mild phenotype of Alström syndrome.

Authors:  Luca Marozio; Francesca Dassie; Gianluca Bertschy; Emilie M Canuto; Gabriella Milan; Stefano Cosma; Pietro Maffei; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.