| Literature DB >> 34847054 |
Stephen Gurley1,2, Brady Bennett2, Patrick Sean Sullivan2, Maryellen Kiley3, Jamie Linde3, David Szczerbacki3, Jodie Guest1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among US young adults, particularly those that belong to racial and ethnic minorities, remains low compared to their older peers. Understanding vaccine perceptions and their influence on vaccination uptake among this population remains crucial to achieving population herd immunity.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; cohort; college; demographic; hesitancy; higher education; intention; minority; perception; prospective; race; uptake; vaccine; young adult
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34847054 PMCID: PMC8675562 DOI: 10.2196/33739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill ISSN: 2369-2960
Demographic characteristics and self-reported COVID-19 vaccination status among students, faculty, and staff at Curry College, Milton, Massachusetts, February 2021.
| Demographics | All participants (N=454), n | Characteristic by self-reported vaccination status | ||||||
|
|
| Unvaccinated (N=149), n (%)a | Vaccinated (N=305), n (%)a | Prevalence ratio (95% CI)b | ||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| Male | 121 | 52 (43) | 69 (57) | Reference | |||
|
| Female | 333 | 90 (27) | 243 (73) | 1.11 (0.94-1.30) | |||
|
| ||||||||
|
| White | 366 | 105 (29) | 261 (71) | Reference | |||
|
| Black | 33 | 19 (58) | 14 (42) | 0.79 (0.63-0.98)c | |||
|
| Other | 34 | 17 (50) | 17 (50) | 0.79 (0.63-0.98) | |||
|
| ||||||||
|
| Non-Hispanic/Latinx | 402 | 124 (31) | 278 (69) | Reference | |||
|
| Hispanic/Latinx | 51 | 25 (49) | 26 (51) | 0.94 (0.75-1.19) | |||
|
| ||||||||
|
| Student | 308 | 122 (40) | 186 (60) | Reference | |||
|
| Staff | 86 | 17 (20) | 69 (80) | 1.45 (1.28-1.64)c | |||
|
| Faculty | 56 | 8 (14) | 48 (86) | 1.45 (1.28-1.64) | |||
|
| ||||||||
|
| Non–health care workers | 313 | 119 (38) | 194 (62) | Reference | |||
|
| Health care workers | 141 | 30 (21) | 111 (79) | 1.35 (1.18-1.54)c | |||
aUnless otherwise stated, percentages shown are row percentages.
bPrevalence ratios with marginal standardization with 95% CI are from multivariate modified logistic regression models testing associations between predictors and vaccination status.
cP<.05.
Figure 1Percentage of participants who self-reported they are unlikely to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Only those who were unvaccinated at each time point were asked this question (N=341 for time point 1 and N=105 for time point 2). HCW: health care worker.
Figure 2Percentage of participants who believed the COVID-19 vaccine was approved too quickly. This question was directed to the entire cohort (N=451 for time point 1 and N=365 for time point 2). HCW: health care worker.
Figure 3COVID-19 vaccine willingness in February 2021, and follow-up vaccine uptake in April 2021. Participants’ self-reported willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in February 2021 and self-reported vaccine status as of late April 2021. Fisher exact t test revealed a significant (P<.001) difference in the distribution of baseline vaccine willingness among those unvaccinated versus vaccinated in April 2021.
Self-reported reasons for hesitancy regarding the COVID-19 vaccine among those in the Curry College Community who were unvaccinated as of April 2021 (N=145; respondents could indicate more than one response)a.
| Reason(s) for hesitancy | The vaccine will give me COVID-19, n (%) | The vaccine affects fertility, n (%) | Natural infection will protect me, n (%) | The approval process was rushed, n (%) | The vaccine is new technology, n (%) | Don’t perceive risk for COVID-19, n (%) | None of the above, n (%) |
| Responses to this question (N=145) | 4 (2.8) | 22 (15.2) | 5 (11.1) | 34 (23.4) | 18 (12.4) | 9 (6.2) | 53 (36.6) |
aThis question was directed at those who reported they were unvaccinated as well as those who said they were unlikely or very unlikely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.