| Literature DB >> 34845435 |
Ajanaw Maru Birhanu1,2, Tadesse Fikre Teferra2, Tesfu Bekele Lema2.
Abstract
This study was designed to improve Ethiopian traditional beer (tella) with the substitution of gesho by moringa leaves to enhance micronutrients. Substitution of gesho by moringa from 50 to 100% against the biochemical dynamics and nutritional and sensorial profiles of tella was assessed. Incorporation of moringa suppressed the activity of yeast and favored those of lactic acid bacteria, which shifted the properties of the product from a mild alcoholic nature to a low alcoholic and mild acidic nature, revealing the probiotic potential of tella. Moringa leaves at 100% substitution for gesho resulted in the least yeast count compared to the other formulations. The storage of tella samples over periods of 10 days also strengthened the probiotic nature of tella by drastically reducing the yeast cell counts (from 5 logs to <1). This corresponded to the slow increase in the acidity (0.63 to 0.99%), indicating comparatively higher activity of lactic acid bacteria. The best nutritional contents (dietary minerals) and sensorial acceptance of the product were attained at the 50% substitution of gesho by moringa. The implication of the present study is that ethnic foods and beverages can be innovated to meet the nutritional needs of the community.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34845435 PMCID: PMC8627356 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7083638
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Figure 1Flow diagram for tella making depicting the major ingredients and operations.
Figure 2Biochemical properties of tella for different preparations (a), formulations (b) and fermentation phases (c); LAB: lactic acid bacteria; TAMC: total aerobic mesophilic count; TA: titratable acidity; G: gesho; M: moringa; values are least square means with standard error as error bars and bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Biochemical properties of tella samples as influenced by combined effects of formulation and fermentation phases.
| Variables | LAB (log10 CFU/mL) | TAMC (log10 CFU/mL) | Yeast (log10 CFU/mL) | pH | TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| 6.47c | 5.56a | 6.93b | 5.86a | 0.50d |
|
| 6.62b | 4.49d | 7.60a | 5.31c | 0.54c |
|
| 7.12a | 5.17b | 6.87b | 4.98d | 0.64a |
|
| 6.50c | 5.48a | 6.88a | 5.80b | 0.47e |
|
| 6.60b | 4.50d | 7.58a | 5.31c | 0.50c |
|
| 7.13a | 5.06c | 6.87b | 4.98d | 0.60b |
| SE | 0.0079 | 0.025 | 0.038 | 0.0086 | 0.0058 |
|
| |||||
| 100% G, | 5.30g | 6.66a | 6.55c | 6.20a | 0.47g |
| 100% G, | 7.30b | 5.01d | 7.40b | 5.80b | 0.49fg |
| 100% G, | 6.85e | 4.89d | 6.78c | 5.60c | 0.50ef |
| 50 : 50, G : M, | 5.50f | 5.28c | 6.63c | 5.73b | 0.51def |
| 50 : 50, G : M, | 7.41a | 4.86d | 8.80a | 5.50d | 0.53cde |
| 50 : 50, G : M, | 6.92d | 3.35f | 7.35b | 4.74e | 0.56c |
| 100% M, | 6.91d | 5.43b | 6.73c | 5.60c | 0.50cde |
| 100% M, | 7.32b | 5.35bc | 7.18b | 4.70e | 0.60b |
| 100% M, | 7.15c | 4.56 | 6.7c | 4.59f | 0.69a |
| SE | 0.0097 | 0.031 | 0.047 | 011 | 0071 |
Values are least square means with standard error; SE: standard error; G: gesho; M: moringa.
Figure 3Shelf life of tella for different preparation methods (a), formulations (b), and storage time (c); TA: titratable acidity; G: gesho; M: moringa; CFU: colony-forming units; values are least square means with standard errors as error bars and those with different connecting letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Shelf life of tella for different preparation methods [A], formulations [B], and storage time [C]; values are least square means with standard errors as error bars and those with different connecting letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
| Variables | Yeast (log10 CFU/mL) | pH | TA (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 2.98ab | 4.97a | 0.63d |
|
| 3.01a | 4.56c | 0.74c |
|
| 2.73c | 4.37d | 0.94a |
|
| 2.95ab | 4.97a | 0.62d |
|
| 3.05a | 4.67b | 0.72c |
|
| 2.86bc | 4.37d | 0.91b |
| SE | 0.0297 | 0.021 | 0.006 |
|
| |||
|
| 5.10a | 4.83a | 0.63 |
|
| 3.63c | 4.64b | 0.68 |
|
| ND | 4.43c | 0.99 |
|
| 5.12a | 4.83a | 0.63 |
|
| 3.73b | 4.76a | 0.65 |
|
| ND | 4.42c | 0.98 |
| SE | 0.03 | 0.021 | 0.006 |
|
| |||
| 100% G, 1 | 5.23a | 5.31a | 0.54e |
| 100% G, 5 | 3.68d | 4.99b | 0.55e |
| 100% G, 10 | ND | 4.61d | 0.75d |
| 50 : 50, G : M, 1 | 5.23a | 4.65cd | 0.59e |
| 50 : 50, G : M, 5 | 3.87c | 4.76c | 0.62e |
| 50 : 50, G : M, 10 | ND | 4.44ef | 0.99b |
| 100% M, 1 | 4.89b | 4.53de | 0.75d |
| 100% M, 5 | 3.50d | 4.35fg | 0.79c |
| 100% M, 10 | ND | 4.23g | 1.23a |
| SE | 0.036 | 0.026 | 0.007 |
Values are least square means with standard error; SE: standard error; G: gesho; M: moringa; TA: titratable acidity; CFU: colony-forming units; values are least square means with standard errors as error bars and those with different connecting letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Mineral composition of tella for different preparations (a, b) and formulations (c, d); G: gesho; M: moringa; values are least square means with standard errors as error bars and those with different connecting letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Dietary mineral contents of tella samples as influenced by preparation and formulation.
| Variables | Zn (mg/L) | Ca (mg/L) | Mg (mg/L) | Na (mg/L) | K (mg/L) | Fe (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
| 1.07b | 4.76c | 3.17c | 61.26c | 300b | 0.008c |
|
| 1.20a | 9.88a | 7.21a | 120.67a | 320a | 0.026a |
|
| 0.81c | 6.52b | 4.31b | 100.32b | 250c | 0.019b |
|
| 1.07b | 4.78c | 3.16c | 61.22c | 300b | 0.008c |
|
| 1.20a | 9.96a | 7.15a | 120.67a | 320a | 0.030a |
|
| 0.81c | 6.51b | 4.31b | 100.32b | 250c | 0.020b |
|
| 0.011 | 0.041 | 0.0196 | 0.158 | 0.038 | 0.0009 |
Values are least square means with standard error; SE: standard error; G: gesho; M: moringa; values are least square means with standard errors as error bars and those with different connecting letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Sensory acceptability of tella from the different preparations and formulations.
| Variables | Color | Aroma | Taste | OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 4.477a | 3.82a | 3.75a | 3.92a |
|
| 4.24b | 3.77a | 3.62a | 3.94a |
| SE | 0.055 | 0.06 | 0.066 | 0.06 |
|
| ||||
| 100% G | 4.38ab | 4.23a | 4.07a | 4.24a |
| 50 : 50, G : M | 4.46a | 4.27a | 4.17a | 4.33a |
| 100%M | 4.23b | 2.88b | 2.80b | 3.22b |
| SE | 0.067 | 0.073 | 0.080 | 0.073 |
|
| ||||
|
| 4.53a | 4.30a | 4.05a | 4.07a |
|
| 4.23ab | 4.16a | 4.086a | 4.41a |
|
| 4.55a | 4.35a | 4.41a | 4.41a |
|
| 4.37ab | 4.20a | 3.94a | 4.23a |
|
| 4.34ab | 2.81b | 2.79b | 3.27b |
|
| 4.12b | 2.96b | 2.82b | 3.16b |
| SE | 0.099 | 0.11 | 0.11858044 | 0.11 |
Values are least square means with standard error; SE: standard error; OA: overall acceptability; values are least square means with standard errors as error those and those with different connecting letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).