| Literature DB >> 34843102 |
Miwako Takahashi1,2, Shuntaro Yoshimura3, Sodai Takyu4, Susumu Aikou3, Yasuhiro Okumura3, Koichi Yagi3, Masashi Fukayama5, Toshimitsu Momose6, Yasuyuki Seto3, Taiga Yamaya4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To reduce postoperative complications, intraoperative lymph node (LN) diagnosis with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is expected to optimize the extent of LN dissection, leading to less invasive surgery. However, such a diagnostic device has not yet been realized. We proposed the concept of coincidence detection wherein a pair of scintillation crystals formed the head of the forceps. To estimate the clinical impact of this detector, we determined the cut-off value using FDG as a marker for intraoperative LN diagnosis in patients with esophageal cancer, the specifications needed for the detector, and its feasibility using numerical simulation.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG; Esophageal cancer; Forceps; Lymph node metastasis; PET
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34843102 PMCID: PMC8897350 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01701-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Nucl Med ISSN: 0914-7187 Impact factor: 2.668
Fig. 1A conceptual illustration of the proposed forceps-type coincidence detector (a), and b simulated geometry of the scintillation crystals and the radiation source (18F)
Fig. 2A plot of radioactivity of all lymph nodes. Lymph nodes (LNs) were numbered according to the amount of radioactivity from low to high (represented on the x-axis). The plot on the right shows an expanded scale for the range of 600 Bq–16,943 Bq (the range of 809–1068 for the LN number). Red circles indicate metastatic LNs and black crosses indicate non-metastatic LNs
Fig. 3A plot of lymph node radioactivity and lymph node weight. Dashed lines indicate the first-order linear approximation equations. Significant correlations were observed between lymph node (LN) radioactivity and LN weight in metastatic LNs (r = 0.726, p < 0.001) and in non-metastatic LNs (r = 0.870, p < 0.001). Red circles indicate metastatic LNs and black crosses indicate non-metastatic LNs
Fig. 4A plot of lymph node radioactivity and the shortest lymph node diameter. Lines indicate the first-order linear approximation equations. Significant correlations were observed between lymph node (LN) radioactivity and the shortest LN diameter in metastatic LNs (r = 0.437, p < 0.008) and in non-metastatic LNs (r = 0.739, p < 0.001). Red circles indicate metastatic LNs and black crosses indicate non-metastatic LNs
Fig. 5A plot of lymph node radioactivity and the longest lymph node diameter. Lines indicate the first-order linear approximation equations. No significant correlation was observed between lymph node (LN) radioactivity and the longest LN diameter in metastatic LNs (r = 0.287, p = 0.089). The correlation was significant in non-metastatic LNs (r = 0.730, p < 0.001). Red circles indicate metastatic LNs and black crosses indicate non-metastatic LNs
Fig. 6Receiver operating characteristic curves for radioactivity and adjusted measurements to discriminate between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes. The values of area under the curve were 0.918 for radioactivity alone, 0.910 for radioactivity divided by the shortest diameter, 0.902 for radioactivity divided by the longest diameter, and 0.819 for radioactivity divided by the lymph node weight
Diagnostic capabilities of each node station using an estimated cut-off value of 620 Bq
| Number | Name of node station ( | True | False | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |||
| Cervical LNs | ||||||
| 101L | Cervical paraesophageal (L) | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 101R | Cervical paraesophageal (R) | 32 | 4 | 19 | 9 | 0 |
| 104L | Supraclavicular (L) | 103 | 0 | 82 | 21 | 0 |
| 104R | Supraclavicular (R) | 75 | 2 | 65 | 8 | 0 |
| Thoracic LNs | ||||||
| 105 | Upper thoracic paraesophageal | 18 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 0 |
| 106recL | Recurrent laryngeal nerve (L) | 58 | 2 | 44 | 12 | 0 |
| 106recR | Recurrent laryngeal nerve (R) | 58 | 2 | 44 | 11 | 1 |
| 106tbL | Tracheobronchia | 21 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 0 |
| 107 | Subcarinal | 44 | 5 | 18 | 21 | 0 |
| 108 | Middle thoracic paraesophageal | 35 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 0 |
| 109L | Main bronchus (L) | 49 | 3 | 31 | 15 | 0 |
| 109R | Main bronchus (R) | 61 | 1 | 33 | 27 | 0 |
| 110 | Lower thoracic paraesophageal | 18 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 0 |
| 111 | Supradiaphragmatic | 22 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 0 |
| 112 | Posterior Mediastinal | 45 | 0 | 31 | 14 | 0 |
| Abdominal LNs | ||||||
| 9 | Along the celiac artery | 33 | 0 | 30 | 3 | 0 |
| 8a | Along the common hepatic artery | 21 | 0 | 13 | 8 | 0 |
| 7 | Along the left gastric artery | 41 | 1 | 34 | 6 | 0 |
| 3 | Along the lesser curvature | 205 | 11 | 161 | 32 | 1 |
| 2 | Left cardiac | 47 | 0 | 43 | 4 | 0 |
| 1 | Right cardiac | 45 | 3 | 38 | 4 | 0 |
| 4 | Along the grater curvature | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Along the splenic artery | 19 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 0 |
| 12 | In the hepatoduodenal ligament | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 1073 | 36 | 815 | 220 | 2 | |
JCEC Japanese classification of esophageal cancer [15], LN lymph node, L left, R right