Gary K Chen1, Qi Yan2, Kimberly C Paul3, Cynthia D J Kusters4, Aline Duarte Folle2, Melissa Furlong5, Adrienne Keener3, Jeff Bronstein3, Steve Horvath4,6, Beate Ritz2. 1. Independent Researcher. 2. Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Department of Community, Environment and Policy, University of Arizona Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stochastic epigenetic mutations (SEM) reflect a deviation from normal site-specific methylation patterns. Epigenetic mutation load (EML) captures the accumulation of SEMs across an individual's genome and may reflect dysfunction of the epigenetic maintenance system in response to epigenetic challenges. OBJECTIVE: We investigate whether EML is associated with PD risk and time to events (i.e., death and motor symptom decline). METHODS: We employed logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association between EML and several outcomes. Our analyses are based on 568 PD patients and 238 controls from the Parkinson's disease, Environment and Genes (PEG) study, for whom blood-based methylation data was available. RESULTS: We found an association for PD onset and EML in all genes (OR = 1.90; 95%CI 1.52-2.37) and PD-related genes (OR = 1.87; 95%CI 1.50-2.32). EML was also associated with time to a minimum score of 35 points on the motor UPDRS exam (OR = 1.28; 95%CI 1.06-1.56) and time to death (OR = 1.29, 95%CI 1.11-1.49). An analysis of PD related genes only revealed five intragenic hotspots of high SEM density associated with PD risk. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest an enrichment of methylation dysregulation in PD patients in general and specifically in five PD related genes. EML may also be associated with time to death and motor symptom progression in PD patients.
BACKGROUND: Stochastic epigenetic mutations (SEM) reflect a deviation from normal site-specific methylation patterns. Epigenetic mutation load (EML) captures the accumulation of SEMs across an individual's genome and may reflect dysfunction of the epigenetic maintenance system in response to epigenetic challenges. OBJECTIVE: We investigate whether EML is associated with PD risk and time to events (i.e., death and motor symptom decline). METHODS: We employed logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association between EML and several outcomes. Our analyses are based on 568 PD patients and 238 controls from the Parkinson's disease, Environment and Genes (PEG) study, for whom blood-based methylation data was available. RESULTS: We found an association for PD onset and EML in all genes (OR = 1.90; 95%CI 1.52-2.37) and PD-related genes (OR = 1.87; 95%CI 1.50-2.32). EML was also associated with time to a minimum score of 35 points on the motor UPDRS exam (OR = 1.28; 95%CI 1.06-1.56) and time to death (OR = 1.29, 95%CI 1.11-1.49). An analysis of PD related genes only revealed five intragenic hotspots of high SEM density associated with PD risk. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest an enrichment of methylation dysregulation in PD patients in general and specifically in five PD related genes. EML may also be associated with time to death and motor symptom progression in PD patients.
Authors: Martin J Aryee; Andrew E Jaffe; Hector Corrada-Bravo; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Andrew P Feinberg; Kasper D Hansen; Rafael A Irizarry Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Amedeo Gagliardi; Pierre-Antoine Dugué; Therese H Nøst; Torkjel M Sandanger; Roger L Milne; Paolo Vineis; Silvia Polidoro; Giovanni Fiorito; Melissa C Southey; Daniel D Buchanan; Daniel F Schmidt; Enes Makalic; Allison M Hodge; Dallas R English; Nicole W Doo; John L Hopper; Gianluca Severi; Laura Baglietto; Alessio Naccarati; Sonia Tarallo; Luigia Pace; Vittorio Krogh; Domenico Palli; Salvatore Panico; Carlotta Sacerdote; Rosario Tumino; Eiliv Lund; Graham G Giles; Barbara Pardini Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Timothy J Triche; Daniel J Weisenberger; David Van Den Berg; Peter W Laird; Kimberly D Siegmund Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Yu-Hsuan Chuang; Kimberly C Paul; Jeff M Bronstein; Yvette Bordelon; Steve Horvath; Beate Ritz Journal: Genome Med Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 11.117