Literature DB >> 32788174

Stochastic Epigenetic Mutations Are Associated with Risk of Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer, and Mature B-cell Neoplasms.

Amedeo Gagliardi1,2, Pierre-Antoine Dugué3,4,5, Therese H Nøst6, Torkjel M Sandanger6, Roger L Milne3,4,5, Paolo Vineis7,8, Silvia Polidoro7,8, Giovanni Fiorito8,9, Melissa C Southey3,5,10, Daniel D Buchanan11, Daniel F Schmidt4,12, Enes Makalic4, Allison M Hodge3,4, Dallas R English3,4, Nicole W Doo3,13,14, John L Hopper4, Gianluca Severi15, Laura Baglietto15,16, Alessio Naccarati7,2, Sonia Tarallo7,2, Luigia Pace7,2, Vittorio Krogh17, Domenico Palli18, Salvatore Panico19, Carlotta Sacerdote20, Rosario Tumino21, Eiliv Lund6,22, Graham G Giles3,4,5, Barbara Pardini7,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related epigenetic dysregulations are associated with several diseases, including cancer. The number of stochastic epigenetic mutations (SEM) has been suggested as a biomarker of life-course accumulation of exposure-related DNA damage; however, the predictive role of SEMs in cancer has seldom been investigated.
METHODS: A SEM, at a given CpG site, was defined as an extreme outlier of DNA methylation value distribution across individuals. We investigated the association of the total number of SEMs with the risk of eight cancers in 4,497 case-control pairs nested in three prospective cohorts. Furthermore, we investigated whether SEMs were randomly distributed across the genome or enriched in functional genomic regions.
RESULTS: In the three-study meta-analysis, the estimated ORs per one-unit increase in log(SEM) from logistic regression models adjusted for age and cancer risk factors were 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-1.41 for breast cancer, and 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.42 for lung cancer. In the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, the OR for mature B-cell neoplasm was 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.71. Enrichment analyses indicated that SEMs frequently occur in silenced genomic regions and in transcription factor binding sites regulated by EZH2 and SUZ12 (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005, respectively): two components of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PCR2). Finally, we showed that PCR2-specific SEMs are generally more stable over time compared with SEMs occurring in the whole genome.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of SEMs is associated with a higher risk of different cancers in prediagnostic blood samples. IMPACT: We identified a candidate biomarker for cancer early detection, and we described a carcinogenesis mechanism involving PCR2 complex proteins worthy of further investigations. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32788174     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  8 in total

1.  A Deep Survival EWAS approach estimating risk profile based on pre-diagnostic DNA methylation: An application to breast cancer time to diagnosis.

Authors:  Michela Carlotta Massi; Lorenzo Dominoni; Francesca Ieva; Giovanni Fiorito
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 2.  Epigenetic Regulation in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Judy S Crabtree
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Stochastic Epigenetic Mutations Influence Parkinson's Disease Risk, Progression, and Mortality.

Authors:  Gary K Chen; Qi Yan; Kimberly C Paul; Cynthia D J Kusters; Aline Duarte Folle; Melissa Furlong; Adrienne Keener; Jeff Bronstein; Steve Horvath; Beate Ritz
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 5.520

4.  Temporal Modulation of Differential Alternative Splicing in HaCaT Human Keratinocyte Cell Line Chronically Exposed to Arsenic for up to 28 Wk.

Authors:  Ana P Ferragut Cardoso; Mayukh Banerjee; Laila Al-Eryani; Mohammed Sayed; Daniel W Wilkey; Michael L Merchant; Juw W Park; J Christopher States
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  DNA methylation-based biomarkers of aging were slowed down in a two-year diet and physical activity intervention trial: the DAMA study.

Authors:  Giovanni Fiorito; Saverio Caini; Domenico Palli; Benedetta Bendinelli; Calogero Saieva; Ilaria Ermini; Virginia Valentini; Melania Assedi; Piera Rizzolo; Daniela Ambrogetti; Laura Ottini; Giovanna Masala
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 9.304

6.  Epigenome-wide association study of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: results from the discovery-BPD program.

Authors:  Xuting Wang; Hye-Youn Cho; Michelle R Campbell; Vijayalakshmi Panduri; Silvina Coviello; Mauricio T Caballero; Deepa Sambandan; Steven R Kleeberger; Fernando P Polack; Gaston Ofman; Douglas A Bell
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 7.259

7.  Multifunctionality of Calebin A in inflammation, chronic diseases and cancer.

Authors:  Aranka Brockmueller; Anna-Lena Mueller; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Bharat B Aggarwal; Mehdi Shakibaei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  A blood DNA methylation biomarker for predicting short-term risk of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Andrea Cappozzo; Cathal McCrory; Oliver Robinson; Anna Freni Sterrantino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Vittorio Krogh; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Licia Iacoviello; Fulvio Ricceri; Sabina Sieri; Paolo Chiodini; Gareth J McKay; Amy Jayne McKnight; Frank Kee; Ian S Young; Bernadette McGuinness; Eileen M Crimmins; Thalida Em Arpawong; Rose Anne Kenny; Aisling O'Halloran; Silvia Polidoro; Giuliana Solinas; Paolo Vineis; Francesca Ieva; Giovanni Fiorito
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 7.259

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.