Literature DB >> 34842122

Is bone quality crucial in arthroplasty of the joints?

O Şahap Atik1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34842122      PMCID: PMC8650661          DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.57902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg        ISSN: 2687-4792


× No keyword cloud information.
Osteoporosis is a major health issue worldwide with considerable economic consequences and adverse effects on quality of life.[1] In arthroplasties, poor bone quality (i.e., poor bone structure) and low bone mineral density, eventually weak bone strength is crucial for the survival of implants. For longer durability of the implants, these factors should be assessed further and efforts should be made to resolve them.[2] The rates of bone production and destruction can be evaluated through a meticulous assessment of the bone matrix components released in the bloodstream and excreted in the urine. Biomarkers of formation include bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and biomarkers of resorption: N-terminal and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen.[3] Osteoporosis in elderly patients is the main problem with the accompanying low bone quality, resulting in osseointegration failure in cementless fixation of the acetabular cup and femoral stem.[4-6] Cement fixation of the implants is recommended to minimize the risk of peri-prosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening.[2] In Medicare patients, cemented femoral fixation outperformed cementless fixation in terms of the length of hospital stay, readmission, cost of care, and reoperation.[7]
  7 in total

1.  Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; N Saito; H Horiuchi; R Iorio; K Takaoka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The role of biomarkers in osteoarthritis and osteoporosis for early diagnosis and monitoring prognosis.

Authors:  O Şahap Atik; Erdem Aras Sezgin; H Emre Tepedelenlioğlu
Journal:  Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi       Date:  2019-08

3.  Higher periprosthetic fracture rate associated with use of modern uncemented stems compared to cemented stems in femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Jin Soo A Song; Daryl Dillman; Dave Wilson; Michael Dunbar; Glen Richardson
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  High early failure rate after cementless hip replacement in the octogenarian.

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Antti Eskelinen; Mikko Peltola; Keijo Mäkelä
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does Femoral Component Cementation Affect Costs or Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients?

Authors:  Jason H Oh; William W Yang; Tara Moore; Kristina Dushaj; H John Cooper; Matthew S Hepinstall
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Are fragility fractures being treated properly?

Authors:  O Şahap Atik; Ahmet Aslan; Mustafa Odluyurt
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2020-06-18

7.  To cement or not to cement, that is the question in elderly!

Authors:  O Şahap Atik; Deniz Çankaya
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2021-06-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.