| Literature DB >> 34841267 |
R Sudha Abirami1, G Suresh Kumar1.
Abstract
As the number of COVID-19 cases increases day by day, the situation and livelihood of people throughout the world deteriorates. The goal of this study is to use machine learning models to identify disease and forecast whether or not a person is infected with the virus or another common illness. More articles about COVID-19 will be released starting in 2020, but we still do not have a reliable prediction mechanism to diagnose the disease with 100% accuracy. This comparison is done to see which model is the most effective in detecting and predicting disease. Despite the fact that we have immunizations, we require a best-prediction strategy to assist all humans in surviving. Researchers claimed that the supervised learning method predicts more accurately than the unsupervised learning method in the majority of studies. Supervised learning is the process of mapping inputs to derived outputs using a set of variables and created functions. This will also help us to optimize performance criteria using experience. It is further divided into two categories: classification and regression. According to recent studies, classification models are more accurate than other models.Entities:
Keywords: Classification; Coronavirus disease (COVID-19); Machine learning; Regression; Supervised; Unsupervised
Year: 2021 PMID: 34841267 PMCID: PMC8605773 DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00965-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SN Comput Sci ISSN: 2661-8907
Fig. 1Prediction using machine learning models
Comparison table about method, algorithmic models used to predict and detect COVID-19
| Author | Year | Method | Model | Algorithm | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 2020 | Supervised learning | Classification | Shallow Single-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (SSLPNN) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model | This research used, binary classification and regression for prediction. From that binary classification model was highly accurate, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.91 than regression analysis |
| [ | 2021 | Supervised learning | Regression model and decision tree | Decision tree and linear regression | In this research, the experimental results of the proposed model showed that the overall R2 is 0.99 from the perspective of confirmed cases |
| [ | 2020 | Supervised learning | Regression model | Linear regression, multilayer perceptron and vector auto regression | This forecasting model stated that, predicted values and matching with cases from John Hopkins University11data we can conclude that the MLP method is giving good prediction results than that of the LR and VAR method using WEKA and Orange |
| [ | 2021 | Artificial neural network | Recurrent neural networks | Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and long short term memory network(LSTM) | This finding has used the ANFIS and LSTM-based prediction model to forecast the COVID-19 pandemic growth in Bangladesh. This research can say that LSTM has provided with more satisfactory results compared to ANFIS for predicting the COVID-19 pandemic |
| [ | 2021 | Supervised learning | Classification | BayesNet, logistic, IBk, CR, PART, and J48 | This study retrospects 114 cases from the Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang Province in China. The results showed that the CR (classification via regression) meta-classifier is the most accurate classifier for predicting the positive and negative COVID-19 cases with an accuracy of 84.21% |
| [ | 2020 | Supervised learning | Classification, regression | Logistic regression and multinomial naïve Bayes classifier | Machine learning algorithms are used for classifying clinical reports into four different classes. After performing classification, it was revealed that logistic regression and multinomial naive Bayesian classifier gives excellent results by having 94% precision, and accuracy 96.2% |
| [ | 2021 | Supervised learning | Classification, regression | Support vector machine, stacking-ensemble learning, ARIMA, CUBIST, RIDGE and RF models | In this study, the Machine Learning approaches employed various models like RF, ARIMA, SVR, CUBIST, and Gradient Boosting to precisely make predictions. It was found that the SVR and SEL were the best in accuracy terms |
| [ | 2020 | Supervised learning | Classification | Logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine naive Bayes, and artificial neutral network | The findings were stated that, the correlation coefficient analysis between various dependent and independent features was carried out. The result of the performance evaluation of the models showed that decision tree model has the highest accuracy of 94.99% |
| [ | 2021 | Supervised learning | Classification | Hybrid social group optimization and support vector classifier | In this work, they propose a pipeline that uses CXR images to detect COVID-19 infection. The features from the CXR images were extracted and the relevant features were then selected using Hybrid Social Group Optimization algorithm. The proposed pipeline achieves a classification accuracy of 99.65% using support vector classifier |
| [ | 2020 | Transfer learning | Convolutional neural networks | VGG16, ResNet50, Inception v3 | In this study, the transfer learning technique has been applied to clinical images. Texture feature extraction is accomplished using Haralick features which focus only to detect COVID-19 using statistical analyses |
| [ | 2021 | Supervised learning | Classification | Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting | Out of all the three methods, Random Forest gave more accuracy of 0.952. But, due to insufficient dataset, data imbalance occurs in this proposed approach. SMOTE technique was used to rectify data imbalance. |
Fig. 2Machine learning models overview