Literature DB >> 34840889

A Roadmap to Patient Engagement: Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy and the ReSolve Clinical Trial.

Samantha LoRusso1, Katy Eichinger1, Kiley Higgs1, Leann Lewis1, Michaela Walker1, James Albert1, Michele Langer1, Rabi Tawil1, Jeffrey M Statland1, Kim S Kimminau1.   

Abstract

We describe our efforts to overcome barriers to patient engagement in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) and offer a roadmap that can be replicated in other rare neurologic disorders. We implemented an engagement plan during Clinical Trial Readiness to Solve Barriers to Drug Development for FSHD (ReSolve), an 18-month, multisite, observational study of individuals with FSHD. Elements of our engagement plan included conducting focus groups during protocol development, patient involvement on the ReSolve external advisory committee, creation of a patient advisory committee, and collaboration with patient advocacy groups. Patient feedback led to adaptations in the study protocol and to changes in recruitment and retention methods. Patient engagement ensures that the patient voice contributes to multiple aspects of trial design and implementation. Our engagement efforts exemplify how collaboration with patients and families can be accomplished in FSHD and the resultant roadmap process may be replicable in other rare neurologic diseases.
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34840889      PMCID: PMC8610524          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  19 in total

1.  Practical aspects of recruitment and retention in clinical trials of rare genetic diseases: the phenylketonuria (PKU) experience.

Authors:  Stephanie J DeWard; Ashley Wilson; Heather Bausell; Ashley S Volz; Kimberly Mooney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The Position of Neuromuscular Patients in Shared Decision Making. Report from the 235th ENMC Workshop: Milan, Italy, January 19-20, 2018.

Authors:  Hanns Lochmüller; Anna Ambrosini; Baziel van Engelen; Mats Hansson; Aad Tibben; Alexandra Breukel; Ellen Sterrenburg; Guus Schrijvers; Ingeborg Meijer; George Padberg; Holly Peay; Lucia Monaco; Mike Snape; Anne Lennox; Elena Mazzone; Nathalie Bere; Mencia de Lemus; Erik Landfeldt; Raffaella Willmann
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about.

Authors:  Lisa Duffett
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Emerging Guidelines for Patient Engagement in Research.

Authors:  John R Kirwan; Maarten de Wit; Lori Frank; Kirstie L Haywood; Sam Salek; Samantha Brace-McDonnell; Anne Lyddiatt; Skye P Barbic; Jordi Alonso; Francis Guillemin; Susan J Bartlett
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

Authors:  Heather Rigby; Conrad V Fernandez
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The Charcot-Marie-Tooth Health Index: Evaluation of a Patient-Reported Outcome.

Authors:  Nicholas E Johnson; Chad Heatwole; Peter Creigh; Michael P McDermott; Nuran Dilek; Man Hung; Jerry Bounsanga; Wan Tang; Michael E Shy; David N Herrmann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 7.  Giving patients a starring role in their own care: a bibliometric analysis of the on-going literature debate.

Authors:  Julia Menichetti; Chiara Libreri; Edoardo Lozza; Guendalina Graffigna
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices.

Authors:  Shuoqi Shen; Krissy A R Doyle-Thomas; Lori Beesley; Amir Karmali; Laura Williams; Nadia Tanel; Amy C McPherson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  The impact of patient advisors on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Margae Knox; Victor L Mleczko; J Nwando Olayiwola
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Clinical trial readiness to solve barriers to drug development in FSHD (ReSolve): protocol of a large, international, multi-center prospective study.

Authors:  Samantha LoRusso; Nicholas E Johnson; Michael P McDermott; Katy Eichinger; Russell J Butterfield; Elena Carraro; Kiley Higgs; Leann Lewis; Karlien Mul; Sabrina Sacconi; Valeria A Sansone; Perry Shieh; Baziel van Engelen; Kathryn Wagner; Leo Wang; Jeffrey M Statland; Rabi Tawil
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.