Literature DB >> 34840792

Differences and similarities among questionnaires to assess pain status in chronic widespread pain population: a quantitative analysis.

Valerie Evans1,2, Felipe Ck Duarte3, Lukas D Linde4,5,6, Dinesh Kumbhare1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, multiple questionnaires are often used as part of the diagnosis of chronic widespread pain. Body Surface Area (BSA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria (FDC) and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) have all been used as screening tools to assess pain status in individuals with widespread pain. However, substantial overlap can be observed among these commonly employed questionnaires. This study aimed to quantitatively determine the most independent and dependent clinical characteristics obtained through these questionnaires and to examine potential redundancies.
METHODS: Seventy-nine participants with widespread pain, 61 females and 18 males, from a chronic pain outpatient clinic were recruited. The FDC, BSA, VAS and the CSI were measured for all participants. A principal component analysis (PCA) using a varimax rotation was used to determine which clinical measures represented separate constructs of widespread pain. This was followed by a regression analysis to assess redundancy between the constructs and related pain characteristics.
RESULTS: The identified three-component PCA solution was characterized by (1) the FDC and CSI score, (2) the VAS score and (3) the BSA score. This indicates that the BSA and the VAS scores capture independent patient information. From the regression analysis, the FDC and CSI scores shared approximately 80% of the variance, indicative of substantial overlap between scores.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that BSA and VAS scores were independent clinical measures of widespread chronic pain, while the FDC and CSI scores were not independent, were highly correlated and provided redundant information. Clinicians should continue using both the BSA and VAS; however, either only FDC or CSI will be beneficial during clinical assessment of widespread chronic pain. © The British Pain Society 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fibromyalgia; central sensitization; diagnosis; questionnaire; widespread chronic pain

Year:  2020        PMID: 34840792      PMCID: PMC8611303          DOI: 10.1177/2049463720979340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  27 in total

1.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Dimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Sample.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Randy Neblett; Alessandro Chiarotto; Jeroen Kregel; Jo Nijs; C Paul van Wilgen; Laurent Pitance; Aleksandar Knezevic; Robert J Gatchel; Tom G Mayer; Carlotta Viti; Cristina Roldan-Jiménez; Marco Testa; Wolnei Caumo; Milica Jeremic-Knezevic; Juan V Luciano
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Measurement Properties of the Central Sensitization Inventory: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Scerbo; Joseph Colasurdo; Sally Dunn; Jacob Unger; Jo Nijs; Chad Cook
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity.

Authors:  Alban Latremoliere; Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Assessment of pain.

Authors:  H Breivik; P C Borchgrevink; S M Allen; L A Rosseland; L Romundstad; E K Breivik Hals; G Kvarstein; A Stubhaug
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions.

Authors:  L Arendt-Nielsen; B Morlion; S Perrot; A Dahan; A Dickenson; H G Kress; C Wells; D Bouhassira; A Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 7.  The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain.

Authors:  Michael Nicholas; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Winfried Rief; Antonia Barke; Qasim Aziz; Rafael Benoliel; Milton Cohen; Stefan Evers; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Andreas Goebel; Beatrice Korwisi; Serge Perrot; Peter Svensson; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Winfried Rief; Antonia Barke; Qasim Aziz; Michael I Bennett; Rafael Benoliel; Milton Cohen; Stefan Evers; Nanna B Finnerup; Michael B First; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Stein Kaasa; Beatrice Korwisi; Eva Kosek; Patricia Lavand'homme; Michael Nicholas; Serge Perrot; Joachim Scholz; Stephan Schug; Blair H Smith; Peter Svensson; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Fibromyalgia diagnosis and biased assessment: Sex, prevalence and bias.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Brian Walitt; Serge Perrot; Johannes J Rasker; Winfried Häuser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Widespread pain and pain intensity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. A cross-sectional comparison between smokers and non-smokers.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Karlsson; Ann-Charlotte Elkan; Ingiäld Hafström
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.