Literature DB >> 29198933

Dimensionality and Reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a Pooled Multicountry Sample.

Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas1, Randy Neblett2, Alessandro Chiarotto3, Jeroen Kregel4, Jo Nijs5, C Paul van Wilgen6, Laurent Pitance7, Aleksandar Knezevic8, Robert J Gatchel9, Tom G Mayer10, Carlotta Viti11, Cristina Roldan-Jiménez12, Marco Testa13, Wolnei Caumo14, Milica Jeremic-Knezevic15, Juan V Luciano16.   

Abstract

Central sensitization (CS) involves the amplification of neural signaling within the central nervous system, which evokes pain hypersensitivity. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) assesses 25 overlapping health-related symptom dimensions that have been reported to be associated with CS-related disorders. Previous studies have reported satisfactory test-retest reliability and internal consistency, but factor analyses have exhibited conflicting results in different language versions. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to thoroughly examine the dimensionality and reliability of the CSI, with pooled data from 1,987 individuals, collected in several countries. The principal component analysis suggested that 1 general factor of CS best described the structure. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a bifactor model, which accounted for the covariance among CSI items, with regard to 1 general factor and 4 orthogonal factors, fit the CSI structure better than the unidimensional and the 4-factor models. Additional analyses indicated substantial reliability for the general factor (ie, Cronbach α = .92; ω = .95; and ω hierarchical = .89). Reliability results for the 4 specific factors were considered too low to be used for subscales. The results of this study clearly suggest that only total CSI scores should be used and reported. PERSPECTIVE: As far as we know, this is the first study that has examined the factor structure and reliability of the CSI in a large multicountry sample. The CSI is currently considered the leading self-report measure of CS-related symptoms worldwide.
Copyright © 2017 The American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central Sensitization Inventory; central sensitivity syndrome, chronic pain, psychometrics; central sensitization; multicountry sample

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29198933     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  22 in total

1.  Validity of the central sensitization inventory with measures of sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jonathan Gervais-Hupé; Jasmine Pollice; Jackie Sadi; Lisa C Carlesso
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Analysis of malingered psychological symptoms in a clinical sample for early detection in initial interviews.

Authors:  Carlos Barbosa-Torres; Natalia Bueso-Izquierdo; Sixto Cubo-Delgado
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Differences and similarities among questionnaires to assess pain status in chronic widespread pain population: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Valerie Evans; Felipe Ck Duarte; Lukas D Linde; Dinesh Kumbhare
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  A protocol for a randomized trial on pain neuroscience education vs. routine physical therapy in people with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Farzaneh Soleiman; Hosein Kouhzad Mohamadi; Maryam Saadat; Fateme Derisfard; Gholamhossein Nassadj
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) through Rasch analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Naym U Roby; Tara L Packham; Joy C MacDermid; Lisa C Carlesso
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  A contemporary neuroscience approach compared to biomedically focused education combined with symptom-contingent exercise therapy in people with chronic whiplash associated disorders: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Iris Coppieters; Ward Willaert; Dorine Lenoir; Mira Meeus; Barbara Cagnie; Kelly Ickmans; Anneleen Malfliet; Lieven Danneels; Brenda De Petter; Jo Nijs
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Exploring pain phenotypes in workers with chronic low back pain: Application of IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Lisa C Carlesso; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; William Shaw; Christian Larivière; Manon Choinière
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2021-03-03

8.  Cognitive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with working memory training in fibromyalgia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Vinicius Souza Dos Souza Dos Santos; Maxciel Zortea; Rael Lopes Alves; Cátia Cilene Dos Santos Naziazeno; Júlia Schirmer Saldanha; Sandra da Conceição Ribeiro de Carvalho; António Jorge da Costa Leite; Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres; Andressa de Souza; Prisla Ücker Calvetti; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pain Neuroscience Education and Physical Therapeutic Exercise for Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain in Spanish Physiotherapy Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Galan-Martin; Federico Montero-Cuadrado; Enrique Lluch-Girbes; María Carmen Coca-López; Agustín Mayo-Iscar; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Central Sensitization in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Population-Based Study of a Japanese Mountain Village.

Authors:  Koji Akeda; Norihiko Takegami; Junichi Yamada; Tatsuhiko Fujiwara; Akinobu Nishimura; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.