| Literature DB >> 34840566 |
Minting Zhu1, Yang He1, Tingting Liu1, Bei Tao1, Weiwei Zhan2, Yifan Zhang3, Jing Xie4, Xi Chen5, Hongyan Zhao1, Lihao Sun1, Jianmin Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical ultrasound, 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT), and cervical CT are routinely used in preoperative localization of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). However, false-negative imaging results are also frequently encountered in clinical practice. Exploring the factors that affect the sensitivity of these imaging modalities is important for the surgical management of PHPT patients.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34840566 PMCID: PMC8616673 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3108395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Clinical features and laboratory test results in PHPT patients.
| Total patients | |
|---|---|
| Number | 352 |
| Age, y | 53.4 ± 12.5 |
| Sex (female : male) | 2.96 : 1 |
| Duration of disease, y | 1 (0.2–4.0) |
| Nephrolithiasis ( | 136 (38.64%) |
| Fracture ( | 30 (8.52%) |
| Serum calcium, mmol/L | 2.76 ± 0.31 |
| Serum phosphate, mmol/L | 0.88 ± 0.20 |
| Serum albumin, g/L | 38.25 ± 3.72 |
| Albumin-corrected serum calcium, mmol/L | 2.79 ± 0.32 |
| Serum PTH, pg/mL | 247.3 (150.0–537.9) |
| Serum ALP, IU/L | 93 (68–142) |
| Serum 25(OH)D, nmol/L | 27.24 (18.05–38.68) |
| 24 h urinary calcium, mmol/24 h | 6.03 (4.35–8.09) |
| Serum creatinine, | 63 (54–79) |
| MDRD, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 99 (80–113) |
| BMD L1-L4, g/cm2 | 0.93 ± 0.20 |
| T-score L1-L4 | −1.58 ± 1.65 |
| BMD femoral neck, g/cm2 | 0.76 ± 0.14 |
| T-score femoral neck | −1.30 ± 1.16 |
| Osteoporosis (T ≦ −2.5) (%) | 36.27% |
| Negative imaging results ( | 18 (5.11%) |
| Tumor length (cm) | 1.8 (1.3–2.7) |
PTH: parathyroid hormone; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; 25(OH)D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; MDRD: modification of diet in renal disease; BMD: bone mineral density.
Figure 1Positive rates in finding parathyroid lesions situated within the neck with different imaging methods. USG: cervical ultrasonography; MIBI: 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT; CT: cervical contrast-enhanced CT scan; PET-CT: 18F-FDG PET/CT; USG or MIBI: applied either the cervical ultrasonography or 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT.
Sensitivity of different imaging methods in localizing parathyroid lesion in PHPT.
| Pathology (no.) | Imaging (no.) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| USG | 234 | 210 | 89.7% (85.0%–93.2%) |
| MIBI | 180 | 164 | 91.1% (86.0%–94.8%) |
| USG or MIBI | 238 | 229 | 96.2% (92.7%–98.1%) |
| CT | 134 | 110 | 82.1% (74.3%–88.0%) |
| PET-CT | 7 | 7 | 100.0% (56.1%–100.0%) |
USG: cervical ultrasonography; MIBI: 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT; CT: cervical contrast-enhanced CT scan; PET-CT: 18F-FDG PET/CT; USG or MIBI: applied either the cervical ultrasonography or 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT.
Influence of clinical features on cervical ultrasonography and 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT in searching parathyroid lesions.
| USG positive | USG negative | MIBI positive | MIBI negative |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, male (%) | 29.05% | 28.00% | 28.74% | 43.75% | 0.913 | 0.211 |
| Age (y) | 52.1 ± 12.4 | 56.3 ± 10.8 | 51.9 ± 12.6 | 55.8 ± 8.9 | 0.103 | 0.228 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7 ± 3.5 | 23.5 ± 3.5 | 22.7 ± 3.6 | 23.1 ± 4.4 | 0.260 | 0.699 |
| Lesion length† (cm) | 2.0 (1.5–3.0) | 1.8 (1.0–2.5) | 2.0 (1.5–3.0) | 1.8 (1.0–2.3) | 0.026 | 0.090 |
| ≤1.3 cm | 15.79% | 39.13% | 16.78% | 42.86% | 0.018 | 0.029 |
| (%, | (30/190) | (9/23) | (25/149) | (6/14) | ||
| >1.3 cm | 84.21% | 60.87% | 83.22% | 57.14% | ||
| (%, | (160/190) | (14/23) | (124/149) | (8/14) | ||
| PTH† (pg/mL) | 288.2 (167.4–667.7) | 264.6 (163.8–673.6) | 328.4 (177.2–738.1) | 210.2 (135.2–664.6) | 0.873 | 0.147 |
| ≤252 pg/mL | 43.09% | 45.00% | 39.10% | 68.75% | 0.869 | 0.022 |
| (%, | (81/188) | (9/20) | (61/156) | (11/16) | ||
| >252 pg/mL | 56.91% | 55.00% | 60.90% | 31.25% | ||
| (%, | (107/188) | (11/20) | (95/156) | (5/16) |
p < 0.05. †Lesion length and PTH were shown with median (higher quartile-lower quartile).
Sensitivity of imaging methods in two groups classified by lesion length.
| Lesion length (cm) | USG (sensitivity, | MIBI (sensitivity, | CT (sensitivity, |
|---|---|---|---|
| >1.3 | 91.95% (160/174) | 93.94% (124/132) | 83.0% (83/100) |
| ≤1.3 | 76.92% (30/39) | 80.64% (25/31) | 73.68% (14/19) |
p < 0.05 between lesion length groups.
Sensitivity of imaging methods in two groups classified by serum PTH.
| PTH (pg/ml) | USG (sensitivity, | MIBI (sensitivity, | CT (sensitivity, |
|---|---|---|---|
| >252 | 90.68% (107/118) | 95.00% (95/100) | 85.00% (68/80) |
| ≤252 | 89.01% (81/91) | 84.72% (61/72) | 76.00% (38/50) |
p < 0.05 between PTH groups. USG: cervical ultrasonography; MIBI: 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT; CT: cervical contrast-enhanced CT scan.
Sensitivity of imaging methods in different PHPT pathological types.
| Adenoma | Hyperplasia | Carcinoma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 211 | 9 | 21 |
| USG | 89.6% (181/202) | 87.5% (7/8) | 85.7% (18/21) |
| MIBI | 96.9% (156/161) | 60.0% (3/5) | 93.3% (14/15) |
| CT | 80.9% (93/115) | 50.0% (2/4) | 92.9% (13/14) |
| PET/CT | 100.0% (4/4) | 100.0% (3/3) |
USG: cervical ultrasonography; MIBI: 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy; CT: cervical contrast-enhanced CT scan; PET-CT: 18F-FDG PET/CT. p < 0.05 adenoma versus hyperplasia.