Literature DB >> 34836949

A database of global coastal conditions.

Mariana Castaneda-Guzman1, Gabriel Mantilla-Saltos2, Kris A Murray3,4, Robert Settlage5, Luis E Escobar6,7,8.   

Abstract

Remote sensing satellite imagery has the potential to monitor and understand dynamic environmental phenomena by retrieving information about Earth's surface. Marine ecosystems, however, have been studied with less intensity than terrestrial ecosystems due, in part, to data limitations. Data on sea surface temperature (SST) and Chlorophyll-a (Chlo-a) can provide quantitative information of environmental conditions in coastal regions at a high spatial and temporal resolutions. Using the exclusive economic zone of coastal regions as the study area, we compiled monthly and annual statistics of SST and Chlo-a globally for 2003 to 2020. This ready-to-use dataset aims to reduce the computational time and costs for local-, regional-, continental-, and global-level studies of coastal areas. Data may be of interest to researchers in the areas of ecology, oceanography, biogeography, fisheries, and global change. Target applications of the database include environmental monitoring of biodiversity and marine microorganisms, and environmental anomalies.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34836949      PMCID: PMC8626420          DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01081-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   6.444


Background & Summary

Remote sensing, referring to the acquisition of information about the Earth’s surface through satellite imagery, has become a powerful tool for monitoring the environment and predicting risks associated with environmental changes[1-4]. From a plethora of applications, remotely sensed data have been used to detect landscape change[5-8], assess biodiversity[9], monitor carbon emissions[10,11], predict infectious diseases[12-14], and track marine coasts[15]. Marine ecosystems, however, have been studied with less intensity than terrestrial ecosystems due, in part, to data limitations. A limitation in the use of global-level remotely sensed data is how time-consuming it proves to be, given that sometimes complex data compilation, curation, standardization, and storage may require high-performance computational facilities[16,17]. An open-access, free-of-cost database of global ocean conditions is instrumental in advancing our understanding of coastal phenomena[12,15]. A significant benefit of satellite-derived information is the historical archives of data[2,10,12]. Technological advances and innovative design have resulted in new generations of satellite sensors that monitor marine environments, such as the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). MODIS sensors are part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Earth Observing System onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites and were designed to provide measurements of global dynamics of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems[18-20]. MODIS provides the longest standing observational marine time series data, given that both the Aqua and Terra satellites have been in orbit since the early 2000s, and it provides a larger set of marine variables for potential evaluation at the same spatial and temporal scale[18]. Nevertheless, there are other enhanced satellite instruments[21], such as the Along Track Scanning Radiometer[22], Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership[23], Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite[24,25], and Sentinel[26], which offer opportunities for future multi-sensor marine variables. Out of the possible marine variables derived from observations of MODIS, sea surface temperature (SST) and Chlorophyll-a (Chlo-a) have the potential to increase our understanding of abiotic (e.g., temperature) and biotic (e.g., primary productivity) ocean conditions[4,20]. SST measured by MODIS infrared radiometers is also referred to as the skin temperature of the ocean. This is because the radiance measured by infrared radiometers originates in the surface thermal skin layer of the ocean and not the water below as measured by in situ thermometers[27]. SST provides fundamental information on the global climate systems, and it is an essential parameter in weather prediction[28]. Chlo-a is a proxy for understanding fluctuations in algae and pigmented bacteria as it can elucidate photosynthetic activity in coastal systems[4,20,29]. The near-surface concentration of Chlo-a is calculated using an empirical relationship derived from in situ measurements, and the implementation of the standard O’Reilly band ratio OCx (e.g., OC3M, for the MODIS sensor) algorithm merged with the color index algorithm of Hu et al.[30,31]. SST and Chlo-a have been crucial in studies to reconstruct environmental phenomena, such as Vibrio cholerae emergence[13,32,33], algae blooms[29,34,35], El Niño and La Niña dynamics[36], and coral bleaching[37]. Satellite-derive data have many limitations given their sensitivity to absorption of solar isolation, heat exchange with the atmosphere, and sub-surface turbulence. Nevertheless, since these conditions are known and common, validation and uncertainty are estimated relative to in situ buoys to correct final datasets[38-40]. Satellite-derived data provide an opportunity to analyze large study areas during extended periods, at the cost of limiting the information to surface level. Complementary approaches may include the addition of more oceanic and atmospheric observations like bathymetry, wind direction, and wind speed[1]. We compiled remotely sensed data of monthly SST and Chlo-a from the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of coastal areas globally for a 18-year period (2003–2020). Data were used to generate summary statistics at yearly and monthly composites. Code is included to update the database as data are released. This database can be downloaded freely through Figshare[41].

Methods

This section describes the procedures used to generate the individual data records that comprise the SST and Chlo-a databases. Data retrieval and analysis performed during the development of the database were executed using the statistical software R[42]. The SST and Chlo-a databases were developed in four stages: (a) data procurement, (b) preparation, (c) processing, and (d) analysis. The first two stages were associated with input data, while the third stage was applied specific methods to construct the core of each database. The fourth stage included the statistical analyses of the data. The methodological stages are summarized in Fig. 1 and described in detail below.
Fig. 1

Workflow diagram. (a) Remotely-sensed data were downloaded from the NASA ERDDAP server in the form of NetCDF files. (b) Data were then transformed into a raster object. (c) Data were then cropped and masked to the exclusive economic zone and imported as GeoTIFF. (d) Data were analyzed to include statistical analyses and exported as raster files.

Workflow diagram. (a) Remotely-sensed data were downloaded from the NASA ERDDAP server in the form of NetCDF files. (b) Data were then transformed into a raster object. (c) Data were then cropped and masked to the exclusive economic zone and imported as GeoTIFF. (d) Data were analyzed to include statistical analyses and exported as raster files.

Data procurement

The database is based on satellite observations derived from the MODIS satellite. The Terra and Aqua satellites have been orbiting around the Earth since their launch in 1999 and 2002, respectively, obtaining data of Earth’s surface every one to two days at three spatial resolutions (250, 500, 1000 m) and 36 spectral bands (from 0.405 to 14.385 µm). From the available atmospheric and oceanic observations made available from NASA’s Aqua Spacecraft, Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in °C and Chlorophyll-a (Chlo-a) in mg*m−3 were selected since they summarize major physical and biological phenomena. SST and Chlo-a are available at a temporal resolution of 1-day, 8-day, and monthly composites and a spatial resolution of ~4 km (Table 1).
Table 1

Data specifications for MODIS remotely-sensed data.

Database TitleOriginatorAccessDataset IDTemporal rangeTemporal resolutionSpatial resolutionTypeFormat
SST, AQUA_MODIS, L3m.MO.SST.sst.4 km, Masked, SMI, NASA GSFC OBPG, R2019.0, Global, 0.04166°,NASA Earth Observing Systemhttps://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/erdMH1sstdmdayR20190SQ.htmlerdMH1sstdmdayR20190SQ2003-2020Monthly Composite4 kmRemotely-sensedNetCDF
Chlorophyll-a, Aqua MODIS, NPP, L3SMI, GlobalNASA Earth Observing Systemhttps://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/erdMH1chlamday.htmlerdMH1chlamday2003-2020Monthly Composite4 kmRemotely-sensedNetCDF

Original satellite-based imagery was collected by the MODIS instrument, part of the NASA Earth Observing System, and downloaded through the NASA’s ERDP server at a temporal resolution of monthly composite, from 2003 to 2020 and at a 4 km spatial resolution as NetCDF files.

Data specifications for MODIS remotely-sensed data. Original satellite-based imagery was collected by the MODIS instrument, part of the NASA Earth Observing System, and downloaded through the NASA’s ERDP server at a temporal resolution of monthly composite, from 2003 to 2020 and at a 4 km spatial resolution as NetCDF files. SST and Chlo-a, among other environmental variables, can be accessed through National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Coastal Watch Environmental Research Division (ERD) Environmental Research Division Data Access Protocol (ERDDAP) data server, also known as the NOAA’s Coastal Watch. NOAA’s Coastal Watch is a program that provides timely access to near-real-time satellite data to monitor, restore, and manage coastal ocean resources, and the ERDDAP Data Server supports manual downloads through a web application and remote downloads from any computer program (e.g., MATLAB, R, JSONP, Python) of both gridded and tabular data[43].

Data downloading

The remote request to the ERDDAP Data Server relies on the creation of specially formed URLs to query the server for a specific database. A URL consists of a root, a target, and a constraint expression[43]. To procure the inputs needed to assemble this database especially formed URLs were created through a programming algorithm in R (Auxiliary Materials[44]). The root or base URLs that provided the location of the gridded database were obtained from the ERDDAP griddap documentation webpage (https://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/documentation.html) and remained constant in all requests for a specific database. The target is the equivalent to the unique identifier or data set ID previously assigned by the ERDDAP (https://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap), in conjunction with a specific data file type extension, for this study .nc was selected producing NetCDF-3 binary files with COARDS/CF/ACDD metadata. NetCDF, Network Common Data Form, files are recommended when using software tools to analyze geospatial data as they provide multidimensional scientific data in a standardized manner (https://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/documentation.html)[45,46]. The constraint expression (or query) helped define the parameters, which correspond to the study period and spatial coverage. Regarding the first parameter, the study period comprised all available observations from the MODIS instrument aboard the Aqua satellite (i.e., monthly composites from 2003 to 2020). The spatial coverage was defined by the minimum and maximum latitude (i.e., 89.98°S to 89.98°N) and longitude (i.e., 179.98°W to 179.98°E) from the original satellite image for global coverage.

Data preparation

Data within the NetCDF files were imported into R using the RNetCDF package[47]. A NetCDF object contains a list of at least four attributes: time, longitude, latitude, and the values of the variable being measured (i.e., SST and Chlo-a). The attribute corresponding to the specific variable being measured was extracted from the NetCDF object and transformed into a raster object using the RNetCDF and raster packages in R[48]. A raster object consists of a matrix of cells (i.e., pixels) organized into rows and columns where each cell contains a value representing information (i.e., temperature and pigmentation) and the metadata corresponding to spatial information of object[49]. As the last piece of the data preparation process, the extent of the raster was verified to match that of the original satellite data. Extent was set to latitude and longitude of 89.98°S to 89.98°N and 179.98°W to 179.98°E, respectively. The coordinate reference system (CRS) was defined to be relative to the WGS84 datum for easy manipulation by the end user.

Data processing

A significant feature of the SST and Chlo-a databases is the addition of the segmentation by the world’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ). EEZ is a marine zone within 200 nautical miles from a country’s coastline where each country claims jurisdiction for economic activities[50]. Given the oceanographic nature of the data, focusing on the 200-mile buffer of EEZ provides a more comprehensive explanation of oceanic changes, with the potential to promote the development of ocean planning initiatives directly influencing human settlements on the coasts. To represent the EEZ, a geospatial vector file in shapefile format was constructed by delimiting a buffer of ~200 miles off coastlines globally. The EEZ regions were defined using the functions crop and mask from the raster[48] package. The function mask allowed to place the area of interest (i.e., the EEZ) on top of each monthly raster, assigning no value to cells outside of the area of interest, while the function crop ensured that each raster matched the extent of that of the area of interest (Fig. 2). The core database included 408 individual rasters cropped and masked to the EEZ of each country.
Fig. 2

Data masking and cropping. Example of masking and cropping a raster. (a) Raster from original NetCDF. (b) Economic Exclusive Zone (solid lines). (c) Raster after crop and mask.

Data masking and cropping. Example of masking and cropping a raster. (a) Raster from original NetCDF. (b) Economic Exclusive Zone (solid lines). (c) Raster after crop and mask.

Statistical analysis

Complementary to the core database, data were treated as an m by n matrix, where m represents the years and n represents the months and stacked in two distinct ways (1) in yearly composites and (2) monthly composites. We created the annual and monthly stacks by using stack function in the raster package[48]. The mean, range, maximum, minimum, and standard deviation values were estimated for annual and monthly SST and Chlo-a. We obtained a total of 90 rasters for the yearly composites (18 years, five different statistics) and 60 rasters for the monthly summaries (12 months, five different statistics).

Data Records

Final data are provided in the form of GeoTIFFs for the EEZs boundaries and statistical analysis results[41]. Data can be downloaded based on annually, monthly, or as summary composites of the 18-years period. Data can also be updated using the code included in the Auxiliary Material in Figshare[44].

Technical Validation

Remotely sensed environmental observations from the MODIS instrument, including SST and Chlo-a, have been validated profusely by the scientific community against a number of models and in situ measurements[51-58] and used in a diverse set of studies[13,14,19,59-67]. For instance, validation of the SST observation uses accurate ship-based infrared radiometers and differing and moored buoys with thermometers a meter of depth[38,56,57]. NASA’s standard processing and distribution of the SST products are performed using software developed by the Ocean Biology Processing Group[18]. SST products are validated internally by NASA using a collocated matchup database of in situ observations that are collected within 30 minutes of an overpass and 10 km of a pixel. MODIS SST observations represent the thermal skin layer of the ocean, which is <1 mm thick and is cooler than the underlying water due to vertical heat flux[68,69]. At night or when wind speeds are greater than ~6 m/s, the relationship between the skin temperature and the subsurface are nearly equal. It is under these conditions that validation and uncertainty estimates relative to sub-surface in situ buoys are typically reported[20,38]. The estimation vs. observation relationship, however, can be very variable under conditions of low wind speeds and reduced sub-surface turbulence[21,70]. Furthermore, NASA MODIS uses a collection of cloud classification algorithms to indicate when a pixel corresponds to clear sky conditions (i.e., no cloud coverage). The most recent cloud-classification method is the Alternating Decision Tress[71]. Other SST observations validations tests include a regional ice test, where reflectance thresholds are determined using the Sentinel-2 MSI calibrated reflectance[72] and correction of dust contamination[73]. MODIS Chlo-a observations are derived from the O’Reilly OC3M algorithm and the Hu color index[30,31]. The algorithm is calculated using an empirical relationship from in situ measurements and remote sensing reflectance in the blue-to-green region of the visible spectrum. Level 3 MODIS data may provide biased minima and maxima values during errors in the observation that, for example, has some cloud contamination or sunlight affecting the value captured by the sensor. Due to potential atmospheric contamination some regions could have a limited number of observations from which to estimate the monthly values, which increases uncertainty. There is an estimated ± 35% nominal uncertainty related to the OC3M algorithm used to derive the global Chlo-a product. Nevertheless, error could increase in optically complex waters like those present in coastal areas[74,75]. We performed a data validation procedure comparing MODIS observation of SST and Chlo-a against gold-standard sensors. More specifically, we compared MODIS data against SST data from Sentinel-3[76] during the year 2020. We found that data from MODIS and Sentinel-3 were statistically indistinguishable with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.99 for the annual mean, minimum, and maximum composites (R2 = 0.99, p < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. S1). Additionally, Chlo-a data were evaluated by comparing MODIS data against SeaWiFS[30] observations for the year 2010, when the SeaWiFS satellite ended operations. We found that MODIS Chlo-a data were significantly correlated with SeaWiFS Chlo-a data but with less strength than for SST evaluations. More specifically, correlation was r = 0.83 (R2 = 0.67, p < 0.05) for the mean, r = 0.71 (R2 = 0.53, p < 0.05) for the maximum, and r = 0.76 (R2 = 0.52, p < 0.05) for the minimum Chlo-a composites (Fig. S2). Together, these results suggest that MODIS data have a robust representation of environmental conditions in global coastal waters, at least when compared against gold-standard datasets of SST and Chlo-a.

Usage Notes

The proposed use of this dataset is for coarse-scale, regional or global-level studies of coastal environmental conditions. Fine-scale assessments of SST and Chlo-a are warranted to improve accuracy and detail of these variables for local-level applications. The data can be used to identify anomalies for SST and Chlo-a at local, regional, and global levels. The example demonstrates SST and Chlo-a data explorations in tropical and temperate localities, identifying patterns along time (Fig. 3). Areas in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States show an increase in mean SST during the month of June to October (Fig. 3a), while areas in the subtropics of the Americas (i.e., Ecuador and Colombia) reveal cooler temperatures during the same period (Fig. 3b). Additional exploration of the data in tropical and subtropical zones of different latitude reveal that Chlo-a increases from September to December (Fig. 4b). Contrarily, in the tropics, Chlo-a concentration increases between March and May (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 3

Sea surface temperature mean monthly values from 2003–2020. (a) Temperate zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (east coast of the United States). (b) Subtropical zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (coast of Chile).

Fig. 4

Chlorophyll-a mean monthly values from 2003–2020. (a) Tropical zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (coast of Ecuador and Colombia). (b) Subtropical zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (coast of Chile).

Sea surface temperature mean monthly values from 2003–2020. (a) Temperate zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (east coast of the United States). (b) Subtropical zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (coast of Chile). Chlorophyll-a mean monthly values from 2003–2020. (a) Tropical zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (coast of Ecuador and Colombia). (b) Subtropical zone monthly averages between the years 2003–2020 (coast of Chile). Supplementary Material
Measurement(s)temperature of sea surface • chlorophyll a
Technology Type(s)satellite imaging
Factor Type(s)geographic location • temporal interval
Sample Characteristic - Environmentsea coast
Sample Characteristic - Locationglobal
  12 in total

1.  Validation of Terra-MODIS phytoplankton chlorophyll fluorescence line height. I. Initial airborne lidar results.

Authors:  Frank E Hoge; Paul E Lyon; Robert N Swift; James K Yungel; Mark R Abbott; Ricardo M Letelier; Wayne E Esaias
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  An improved algorithm for retrieving chlorophyll-a from the Yellow River Estuary using MODIS imagery.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Wenting Quan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A global map of suitability for coastal Vibrio cholerae under current and future climate conditions.

Authors:  Luis E Escobar; Sadie J Ryan; Anna M Stewart-Ibarra; Julia L Finkelstein; Christine A King; Huijie Qiao; Mark E Polhemus
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.112

4.  Spatio-temporal variability of SST and Chlorophyll-a from MODIS data in the Persian Gulf.

Authors:  Masoud Moradi; Keivan Kabiri
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 5.  The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises.

Authors:  Nick Watts; Markus Amann; Nigel Arnell; Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson; Jessica Beagley; Kristine Belesova; Maxwell Boykoff; Peter Byass; Wenjia Cai; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum; Stuart Capstick; Jonathan Chambers; Samantha Coleman; Carole Dalin; Meaghan Daly; Niheer Dasandi; Shouro Dasgupta; Michael Davies; Claudia Di Napoli; Paula Dominguez-Salas; Paul Drummond; Robert Dubrow; Kristie L Ebi; Matthew Eckelman; Paul Ekins; Luis E Escobar; Lucien Georgeson; Su Golder; Delia Grace; Hilary Graham; Paul Haggar; Ian Hamilton; Stella Hartinger; Jeremy Hess; Shih-Che Hsu; Nick Hughes; Slava Jankin Mikhaylov; Marcia P Jimenez; Ilan Kelman; Harry Kennard; Gregor Kiesewetter; Patrick L Kinney; Tord Kjellstrom; Dominic Kniveton; Pete Lampard; Bruno Lemke; Yang Liu; Zhao Liu; Melissa Lott; Rachel Lowe; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Mark Maslin; Lucy McAllister; Alice McGushin; Celia McMichael; James Milner; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Karyn Morrissey; Simon Munzert; Kris A Murray; Tara Neville; Maria Nilsson; Maquins Odhiambo Sewe; Tadj Oreszczyn; Matthias Otto; Fereidoon Owfi; Olivia Pearman; David Pencheon; Ruth Quinn; Mahnaz Rabbaniha; Elizabeth Robinson; Joacim Rocklöv; Marina Romanello; Jan C Semenza; Jodi Sherman; Liuhua Shi; Marco Springmann; Meisam Tabatabaei; Jonathon Taylor; Joaquin Triñanes; Joy Shumake-Guillemot; Bryan Vu; Paul Wilkinson; Matthew Winning; Peng Gong; Hugh Montgomery; Anthony Costello
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Terry P Hughes; Kristen D Anderson; Sean R Connolly; Scott F Heron; James T Kerry; Janice M Lough; Andrew H Baird; Julia K Baum; Michael L Berumen; Tom C Bridge; Danielle C Claar; C Mark Eakin; James P Gilmour; Nicholas A J Graham; Hugo Harrison; Jean-Paul A Hobbs; Andrew S Hoey; Mia Hoogenboom; Ryan J Lowe; Malcolm T McCulloch; John M Pandolfi; Morgan Pratchett; Verena Schoepf; Gergely Torda; Shaun K Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate.

Authors:  Nick Watts; Markus Amann; Nigel Arnell; Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson; Kristine Belesova; Maxwell Boykoff; Peter Byass; Wenjia Cai; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum; Stuart Capstick; Jonathan Chambers; Carole Dalin; Meaghan Daly; Niheer Dasandi; Michael Davies; Paul Drummond; Robert Dubrow; Kristie L Ebi; Matthew Eckelman; Paul Ekins; Luis E Escobar; Lucia Fernandez Montoya; Lucien Georgeson; Hilary Graham; Paul Haggar; Ian Hamilton; Stella Hartinger; Jeremy Hess; Ilan Kelman; Gregor Kiesewetter; Tord Kjellstrom; Dominic Kniveton; Bruno Lemke; Yang Liu; Melissa Lott; Rachel Lowe; Maquins Odhiambo Sewe; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Mark Maslin; Lucy McAllister; Alice McGushin; Slava Jankin Mikhaylov; James Milner; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Karyn Morrissey; Kris Murray; Simon Munzert; Maria Nilsson; Tara Neville; Tadj Oreszczyn; Fereidoon Owfi; Olivia Pearman; David Pencheon; Dung Phung; Steve Pye; Ruth Quinn; Mahnaz Rabbaniha; Elizabeth Robinson; Joacim Rocklöv; Jan C Semenza; Jodi Sherman; Joy Shumake-Guillemot; Meisam Tabatabaei; Jonathon Taylor; Joaquin Trinanes; Paul Wilkinson; Anthony Costello; Peng Gong; Hugh Montgomery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Effects of global climate on infectious disease: the cholera model.

Authors:  Erin K Lipp; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Viewing marine bacteria, their activity and response to environmental drivers from orbit: satellite remote sensing of bacteria.

Authors:  D Jay Grimes; Tim E Ford; Rita R Colwell; Craig Baker-Austin; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Ajit Subramaniam; Douglas G Capone
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 10.  Satellite remote sensing of harmful algal blooms (HABs) and a potential synthesized framework.

Authors:  Li Shen; Huiping Xu; Xulin Guo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.