| Literature DB >> 34836538 |
Kenji Ezoe1, Tetsuya Miki1, Tadashi Okimura1, Kazuo Uchiyama1, Akiko Yabuuchi1, Tamotsu Kobayashi1, Keiichi Kato2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information regarding the influence of cytoplasmic events during fertilisation on the clinical outcome remains limited. The cytoplasmic halo is one of these events. A previous study that used time-lapse technology found an association of the presence and morphokinetics of the cytoplasmic halo with cleavage patterns, development to the blastocyst stage, and the ongoing pregnancy rate after blastocyst transfer. Therefore, the cytoplasmic halo may be a useful predictor of the pregnancy outcome after cleaved embryo transfer. This study evaluated the ability of the cytoplasmic halo to predict a live birth after fresh cleaved embryo transfer on day 2, and sought to identify factors potentially influencing the presence and morphokinetics of the halo.Entities:
Keywords: Cleaved embryo transfer; Cytoplasmic halo; In vitro fertilisation; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Live birth; Pronucleus
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34836538 PMCID: PMC8620661 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00859-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Fig. 1Definition of parameters annotated during fertilisation. The initial positions of the pronuclei were categorised into three groups: central (yellow), intermediate (green), and cortical (grey). The position of the pronucleus in relation to that of the cytoplasmic halo was also annotated (same side vs. opposite side). Dark grey, cytoplasmic granules; light grey, halo; blue, male pronucleus; purple, female pronucleus
Association of the cytoplasmic halo with cycle characteristics and clinical outcomes
| Halo-positive | Halo-negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients, n | 866 | 36 | |
| Female age (y) | 36.8 ± 0.1 | 38.2 ± 0.6 | 0.0517 |
| Male age (y) | 39.3 ± 0.2a | 43.1 ± 1.2b | 0.0001 |
| Previous embryo transfer cycles, n | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 0.8992 |
| Cause of infertility | 0.9447 | ||
| Ovulation, n (%) | 30 (3.5) | 1 (2.8) | |
| Tubal factor, n (%) | 16 (1.9) | 1 (2.8) | |
| Endometrial factor, n (%) | 70 (8.1) | 4 (11.1) | |
| Male factor, n (%) | 112 (12.9) | 3 (8.3) | |
| Combined, n (%) | 20 (2.3) | 1 (2.8) | |
| Unexplained, n (%) | 618 (71.4) | 26 (72.2) | |
| Ovarian stimulation | 0.8694 | ||
| Natural cycle, n (%) | 120 (13.9) | 4 (11.1) | |
| Clomiphene citrate cycle, n (%) | 685 (79.1) | 29 (80.6) | |
| Letrozole cycle, n (%) | 61 (7.0) | 3 (8.3) | |
| Oestradiol level on day of the trigger (pg/mL) | 777.6 ± 14.1 | 717.0 ± 63.4 | 0.3925 |
| Progesterone level on day of the trigger (ng/mL) | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.2016 |
| Oocytes retrieved, n | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8497 |
| Oocyte diameter | 113.5 ± 0.2 | 113.3 ± 0.6 | 0.7871 |
| Total sperm number (×106) | 173.8 ± 6.1 | 155.7 ± 21.9 | 0.5539 |
| Motile sperm number (×106) | 93.1 ± 3.9 | 68.9 ± 10.2 | 0.2067 |
| Motile sperm rate (%) | 50.7 ± 0.6 | 46.6 ± 3.0 | 0.1883 |
| Abnormal sperm number (×106) | 164.6 ± 5.8 | 147.4 ± 20.7 | 0.5477 |
| Abnormal sperm rate (%) | 94.8 ± 0.1 | 94.8 ± 0.3 | 0.8384 |
| Embryos transferred, n | 866 | 36 | |
| Blastomeres in embryos transferred | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 0.0802 |
| Morphological grade based on Veeck’s criteria | |||
| 1, n (%) | 133 (15.4) | 4 (11.1) | 0.4866 |
| 2, n (%) | 250 (28.9) | 9 (25.0) | 0.6152 |
| 3, n (%) | 478 (55.2) | 21 (58.3) | 0.7107 |
| 4, n (%) | 5 (0.6)a | 2 (5.6)b | 0.0009 |
| Clinical pregnancy, n (%) | 251 (29.0) | 6 (16.7) | 0.1087 |
| Ongoing pregnancy, n (%) | 215 (24.8) | 4 (11.1) | 0.0600 |
| Live birth, n (%) | 183 (21.1)a | 2 (5.6)b | 0.0233 |
| Miscarriage, n (%) | 61 (24.3)a | 4 (66.7)b | 0.0183 |
The data are shown as the mean and standard error of mean unless otherwise indicated
tHa Time of halo initiation, tHc Time when centripetal movement ended, tHd Time when the halo phenomenon disappeared, tHr Time when the granules started to redistribute, TI Time interval
Logistic regression analysis of TI from tHa to tHd and live birth rate after fresh cleaved embryo transfer
| Univariate logistic regression analysis | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | AUC | aOR | 95% CI | AUC | |||
| Female age | 0.832 | 0.796–0.868 | < 0.0001 | 0.704 | 0.827 | 0.778–0.878 | < 0.0001 | 0.732 |
| Male age | 0.930 | 0.901–0.959 | < 0.0001 | 0.611 | 1.018 | 0.978–1.060 | 0.3681 | |
| Ovarian stimulation | 0.594 | |||||||
| Natural | Reference | – | Reference | – | ||||
| Clomiphene citrate | 0.401 | 0.263–0.618 | < 0.0001 | 0.732 | 0.455–1.177 | 0.1979 | ||
| Letrozole | 1.250 | 0.657–2.360 | 0.4938 | 1.046 | 0.526–2.077 | 0.8987 | ||
| Insemination method | 0.506 | |||||||
| cIVF | Reference | – | Reference | – | ||||
| ICSI | 0.943 | 0.666–1.347 | 0.7472 | 0.927 | 0.629–1.363 | 0.6990 | ||
| Blastomere number | 1.081 | 0.986–1.185 | 0.0983 | 0.535 | 1.100 | 0.997–1.214 | 0.0575 | |
| Morphological grade | 0.550 | |||||||
| 1 | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – | ||
| 2 | 1.212 | 0.731–2.049 | 0.4587 | 1.509 | 0.867–2.625 | 0.1452 | ||
| 3 | 0.986 | 0.618–1.614 | 0.9560 | 1.138 | 0.681–1.899 | 0.6214 | ||
| 4 | 0.981 | 0.049–6.974 | 0.9869 | 0.754 | 0.103–5.734 | 0.1656 | ||
| TI from tHa to tHd | 0.879 | 0.825–0.934 | < 0.0001 | 0.593 | 0.879 | 0.817–0.946 | 0.0004 | |
aOR Adjusted odds ratio, AUC Area under the curve, CI Confidence interval, cIVF Conventional in vitro fertilisation, ICSI Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, OR Odds ratio, tHa Time of halo initiation, tHd Time when the halo phenomenon disappeared, TI Time interval
Spearman correlation of duration of halo with serum hormone level, oocyte diameter, and semen quality
| TI from tHa to tHd | TI from tHa to tHc | TI from tHc to tHr | TI from tHr to tHd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female age | 0.0049 ( | 0.0350 ( | −0.0312 ( | 0.0182 ( |
| Male age | − 0.0557 ( | −0.0382 ( | − 0.0441 ( | 0.0354 ( |
| Oestradiola | 0.0212 ( | 0.0231 ( | 0.0106 ( | −0.0365 ( |
| Progesteronea | 0.0177 ( | 0.0020 ( | 0.0420 ( | −0.0133 ( |
| Number of oocytes retrieved | 0.0298 ( | 0.0364 ( | 0.0194 ( | 0.0206 ( |
| Oocyte diameter | −0.1888 ( | 0.0054 ( | −0.1158 ( | −0.1130 ( |
| Total sperm number | 0.0109 ( | 0.0141 ( | 0.0131 ( | −0.0140 ( |
| Motile sperm number | 0.0019 ( | 0.0148 ( | 0.0012 ( | −0.0191 ( |
| Motile sperm rate | 0.0036 ( | 0.0275 ( | −0.0153 ( | −0.0260 ( |
| Abnormal sperm number | 0.0072 ( | 0.0157 ( | 0.0106 ( | −0.0152( |
| Abnormal sperm rate | − 0.0292 ( | −0.0411 ( | 0.0378 ( | −0.0011 ( |
aSerum hormone levels on day of trigger
tHa Time of halo initiation, tHc Time when centripetal movement ended, tHd Time when the halo phenomenon disappeared, tHr Time when the granules started to redistribute, TI Time interval
Association of the cytoplasmic halo with type of ovarian stimulation
| Embryos with cytoplasmic halo, n (%) | TI from tHa to tHd | TI from tHa to tHc | TI from tHc to tHr | TI from tHr to tHd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural | 685 (95.9) | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| Clomiphene citrate | 61 (95.3) | 14.2 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.0 |
| Letrozole | 120 (96.8) | 13.4 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| | 0.8694 | 0.0806 | 0.3142 | 0.0739 | 0.3542 |
| cIVF | 266 (95.3) | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
| ICSI | 600 (96.3) | 14.2 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.0 |
| | 0.4926 | 0.6634 | 0.0122 | 0.0121 | 0.5077 |
| Central | 215 (95.6) | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 5.1 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| Intermediate | 265 (95.7) | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
| Cortical | 386 (96.5) | 14.0 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.0 |
| | 0.7959 | 0.4239 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.2038 |
| PN on same side ( | N.A. | 14.8 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| PN on opposite side ( | N.A. | 14.0 ± 0.2 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.0 |
| | – | 0.0011 | 0.7225 | 0.0004 | 0.9623 |
| Same side ( | N.A. | 14.0 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.0 |
| Opposite side ( | N.A. | 14.3 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.0 |
| | – | 0.0948 | 0.3170 | 0.5903 | 0.2471 |
The data are shown as the mean and standard error of mean unless otherwise indicated
tHa Time of halo initiation, tHc Time when centripetal movement ended, tHd Time when the halo phenomenon disappeared, tHr Time when the granules started to redistribute, TI Time interval, cIVF Conventional in vitro fertilisation, ICSI Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, PN Pronucleus, N.A Not applicable