| Literature DB >> 34836182 |
Lyndsay Krisher1, Jaime Butler-Dawson1, Karen Schlosser2, Claudia Asensio3, Elisa Sinibaldi2, Hillary Yoder4, Lynn Dexter1, Miranda Dally1, Daniel Pilloni3, Alex Cruz3, Diana Jaramillo1, Lee S Newman1,5.
Abstract
Rates of anemia among agricultural workers, who are also at risk for kidney injury and chronic kidney disease of unknown cause (CKDu), are unknown. We evaluated body composition through the sum of three skinfolds among 203 male sugarcane cutters and assessed the relationship of variables related to nutrition, anemia (hemoglobin < 13 g/dL), and elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using linear regression. Eleven percent of workers were at the level of essential body fat (2-5%). Anemia was present among 13% of workers, 70% of which were normochromic normocytic, a type of anemia suggesting potential underlying chronic disease. Anemia was more common among those with lower BMI and fat free mass. The prevalence of elevated HbA1c was 21%. A moderate negative correlation was found between hemoglobin and HbA1c (Pearson's r = -0.32, p <0.01) which suggests that HbA1c values should be interpreted with caution in populations that have high rates of anemia. Twelve percent of workers had reduced kidney function with an eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. On average, the eGFR was 18 mL/min per 1.73 m2 lower [(95% CI:-24, -12), p <0.01)] for those with anemia than those without, and 8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 lower among those with elevated HbA1c [(95% CI: -13, -2), p < 0.01]. Results will inform future studies examining the role of anemia in the evaluation of CKDu and interventions to improve nutrition for workers in low-resource settings.Entities:
Keywords: agricultural workers; kidney disease; nutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34836182 PMCID: PMC8621317 DOI: 10.3390/nu13113928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Univariate comparisons of demographic and anthropometric measures between workers from highland communities (Altiplano) versus coastal (Zona), mid-harvest, January 2019.
| Variable | All Participants (N = 203) | Altiplano (n = 103) | Zona (n = 100) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or N (%) | ||||
| Age (years) | 28 (7) | 28 (7) | 28 (8) | 0.67 |
| Height (cm) | 160.2 (5.5) | 159.5 (4.5) | 160.8 (6.3) | 0.09 |
| Weight (kg) | 55.7 (7.5) | 55.5 (6.5) | 55.9 (8.4) | 0.72 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.7 (2.5) | 21.8 (2.1) | 21.6 (2.7) | 0.52 |
| --Underweight (BMI ≤ 18.5), n(%) | 10 (5%) | 6 (6%) | 4 (4%) | |
| --Overweight (BMI ≥ 25), n(%) | 14 (7%) | 7 (7%) | 7 (7%) | 0.90 |
| Body density (kg/L) | 1.1 (0.0) | 1.1 (0.0) | 1.1 (0.0) | 0.99 |
| Body fat % | 8.5 (4.0) | 8.5 (3.5) | 8.5 (4.5) | 0.96 |
| --Essential body fat % (2–5%), n(%) | 23 (11%) | 9 (9%) | 14 (14%) | 0.23 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 5.0 (3.8) | 4.9 (2.6) | 5.0 (3.8) | 0.71 |
| Fat free mass * (kg) | 50.8 (5.2) | 50.7 (4.8) | 50.9 (5.7) | 0.78 |
* includes muscle, water, and bone mass.
Markers of underlying health among participants, mid-harvest, January 2019.
| Biomarker | All Participants (N = 203) | Altiplano | Zona | Reference Values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or N (%) | |||||
| Serum Creatinine | 0.9 (0.2) | 0.9 (0.2) | 0.9 (0.2) | 0.33 | 0.6–1.2 mg/dL |
| eGFR | 114.2 (17.8) | 113.2 (16.6) | 115.2 (19.0) | 0.44 | ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 |
| --60–89 eGFR (n (%)) | 22 (11%) | 11 (11%) | 11 (11%) | 0.93 | 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 |
| --30–59 eGFR (n (%)) | 3 (1%) | 1 (1%) | 2 (2%) | 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2 | |
| Serum Albumin | 4.8 (0.2) | 4.8 (0.2) | 4.8 (0.2) | 0.44 | 3.4–5.4 g/dL |
| BUN | 13.5 (3.7) | 12.3 (3.5) | 14.6 (3.5) | <0.01 * | 7–20 mg/dL |
| --Elevated BUN (n (%)) | 12 (6%) | 5 (5%) | 7 (7%) | 0.52 | >20 mg/dL |
| HbA1c | 5.4 (0.3) | 5.3 (0.3) | 5.5 (0.3) | <0.01 * | 3.6–5.6% |
| --Elevated HbA1c (n (%)) | 42 (21%) | 12 (12%) | 30 (30%) | <0.01 * | 5.7–6.4% |
| Systolic BP, mean (SD) | 114.3 (12.3) | 116.2 (11.6) | 112.3 (12.8) | 0.03 | <120 mmHg |
| --High Systolic (n (%)) | 88 (44%) | 52 (51%) | 36 (37%) | 0.05 | ≥120 mmHg |
| Diastolic BP, mean (SD) | 70.6 (7.7) | 71.5 (7.9) | 69.6 (7.5) | 0.09 | <80 mmHg |
| --High diastolic (n (%)) | 39 (19.4%) | 24 (23.3%) | 15 (15.3%) | 0.15 | ≥80 mmHg |
| Blood pressure (n (%)) | |||||
| --Normal | 98 (49%) | 42 (41%) | 56 (57%) | 0.02 | <120 and < 80 mm Hg |
| --Elevated | 103 (51%) | 61 (59%) | 42 (42%) | ≥120 and/or ≥ 80 mm Hg | |
* Values significant at p ≤ 0.01. eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2), BUN blood urea nitrogen, BP blood pressure.
Figure 1(a) Distribution of HbA1c and (b) Distribution of Hemoglobin, by worker origin, mid-harvest, January 2019.
Complete blood count (CBC) measures.
| Blood Count Measures | Cohort (n = 203) | Altiplano (n = 103) | Zona (n = 100) | Reference Values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or N (%) | |||||
| Hemoglobin | 14.2 (1.2) | 14.3 (1.1) | 14.0 (1.3) | 0.04 | 13–18 g/dL |
| --Anemia, n (%) | 27 (13%) | 10 (10%) | 17 (17%) | 0.13 | <13 g/dL |
| Hematocrit | 41.4 (3.3) | 41.8 (3.0) | 41.0 (3.6) | 0.07 | 42–50% |
| --Low Hematocrit, n (%) | 109 (54%) | 51 (50%) | 58 (53%) | 0.23 | <42% |
| MCV | 90.4 (3.5) | 90.1 (3.4) | 90.8 (3.6) | 0.11 | 82–92 fL |
| MCH | 31.0 (1.3) | 30.9 (1.3) | 31.1 (1.3) | 0.20 | 27–32 pg |
| MCHC | 34.3 (0.5) | 34.3 (0.5) | 34.3 (0.6) | 0.88 | 32–36 g/dL |
| RDW | 12.8 (0.9) | 12.6 (0.8) | 12.9 (0.9) | <0.01 * | 11.8–15.6% |
| % Lymphocytes | 31.6 (7.1) | 30.9 (7.6) | 32.4 (6.6) | 0.14 | 20–45% |
| # Lymphocytes | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.7) | 0.17 | 1.09–2.99 K/uL |
| % Monocytes | 9.4 (3.9) | 7.7 (1.3) | 11.2 (4.7) | <0.01 * | 3–8% |
| # Monocytes | 0.9 (0.4) | 0.7 (0.2) | 1.0 (0.5) | <0.01 * | 0.24–0.79 K/uL |
| % Segmented neutrophils | 59.2 (8.5) | 61.5 (8.3) | 56.9 (8.1) | <0.01 * | 40–60% |
| # Segmented neutrophils | 5.6 (1.8) | 5.9 (2.1) | 5.21 (1.3) | <0.01 * | 1.63–6.96 K/uL |
| Leukocytes | 9.3 (2.0) | 9.4 (2.2) | 9.1 (1.7) | 0.38 | 5–10 K/uL |
| Erythrocytes | 4.6 (0.4) | 4.7 (0.4) | 4.5 (0.4) | 0.01 * | 4.5–6.2 M/uL |
| Platelets | 324.7 (71.5) | 339.9 (70.5) | 309.0 (69.3) | <0.01 * | 150–500 K/uL |
* Values significant at p ≤ 0.01. MCV mean corpuscular volume, MCH mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, RDW erythrocyte distribution width. % percent, # number.
Association of hematological and anthropometric explanatory variables with eGFR among sugarcane cutters (n = 202), controlling for age and origin.
| Measures | Estimate (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevated HbA1C (≥5.7) | −7.7 (−13.1, −2.3) | <0.01 * |
| Anemia (Hb < 13 g/dL) | −18.2 (−24.2, −12.2) | <0.01 * |
| Low hematocrit (<42%) | −7.7 (−12.0, −3.5) | <0.01 * |
| Serum albumin (g/dL) | −11.9 (−21.1, −2.7) | <0.01 * |
| BUN (mg/dL) | −2.9 (−3.3, −2.4) | <0.01 * |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.0 (−0.2, 0.2) | 0.99 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | −0.0 (−0.3, 0.3) | 0.95 |
| Body fat % | −0.1 (−0.6, 0.5) | 0.79 |
| Fat mass (kg) | −0.2 (−0.8, 0.5) | 0.68 |
| Fat free mass (kg) | −0.2 (−0.6, 0.2) | 0.32 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.2 (−1.1, 0.7) | 0.64 |
* Values significant at p ≤ 0.01. BUN blood urea nitrogen, BMI body mass index.
Risk factor analysis comparing participants with anemia (Hb < 13 g/dL, n = 27) versus participants with normal hemoglobin (n = 176), controlling for age and origin.
| Measures | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) | 0.95 (0.92, 0.97) | <0.01 * |
| Elevated HbA1c (≥5.7%) | 3.30 (1.35, 8.08) | <0.01 * |
| Serum albumin (g/dL) | 0.12 (0.02, 0.78) | 0.03 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 1.27 (1.13, 1.43) | <0.01 * |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.98 (0.95, 1.02) | 0.32 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 0.98 (0.93, 1.04) | 0.48 |
| Body fat % | 0.84 (0.72, 0.99) | 0.03 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 0.75 (0.58, 0.96) | 0.02 |
| Fat free mass (kg) | 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) | <0.01 * |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.69 (0.53, 0.89) | <0.01 * |
* Values significant at p ≤ 0.01. eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, BUN blood urea nitrogen, BMI body mass index.
Risk factor analysis comparing participants with elevated HbA1c (HbA1c ≥5.7, n = 42) versus participants with normal HbA1c (n = 161), controlling for age and origin.
| Measures | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) | 0.01 * |
| Anemia (Hb < 13 g/dL) | 3.30 (1.35, 8.05) | <0.01 * |
| Low hematocrit (<42%) | 2.48 (1.16, 5.29) | 0.02 |
| Serum albumin | 0.37 (0.08, 1.73) | 0.21 |
| BUN | 1.14 (1.03, 1.26) | 0.01 * |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 1.02 (0.99, 1.05) | 0.24 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) | 0.85 |
| Body fat % | 1.02 (0.93, 1.11) | 0.71 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 1.03 (0.93, 1.13) | 0.63 |
| Fat free mass (kg) | 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) | 0.62 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.05 (0.92, 1.12) | 0.49 |
* Values significant at p ≤ 0.01. eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, BUN blood urea nitrogen, BMI body mass index.
Figure 2Scatter plot with 95% prediction ellipse depicting correlation between hemoglobin and HbA1c among 203 sugarcane workers.
Anemia type among 27 sugarcane workers with low hemoglobin.
| Anemia Type | Cohort (n = 27) | Altiplano (n = 10) | Zona (n = 17) |
|---|---|---|---|
| N(%) | |||
| Microcytic | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Hypochromic Microcytic | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) |
| Macrocytic | 4 (15%) | 1 (10%) | 3 (18%) |
| Borderline Macrocytic | 3 (11%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (18%) |
| Normochromic Normocytic | 19 (70%) | 9 (90%) | 10 (59%) |
Average eGFR by anemia type.
| Anemia Type | eGFR, Mean (SD) | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-anemic (Hb ≥ 13 mg/dL) (n = 175) | 117 (14) | 67–137 | <0.01 * |
| Anemic (Hb < 13 mg/dL) (n = 27) | 96 (28) | 32–135 | |
| --Hypochromic Microcytic (n = 1) | 110 (-) | - | |
| --Macrocytic (n = 4) | 89 (45) | 32–135 | |
| --Borderline Macrocytic (n = 3) | 80 (19) | 60–97 | |
| --Normochromic Normocytic (n = 19) | 100 (25) | 36–134 |
* Values significant at p ≤ 0.01. eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2), Hb Hemoglobin.