| Literature DB >> 34834094 |
Jia Ling Tsong1, Lucky Poh Wah Goh1, Jualang Azlan Gansau1, Siew-Eng How1.
Abstract
Nephelium lappaceum (N. lappaceum) and Nephelium ramboutan-ake (N. ramboutan-ake) are tropical fruits that gain popularity worldwide due to their tastiness. Currently, their potential to be used as pharmaceutical agents is underestimated. Chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and aging have high incidence rates in the modern world. Furthermore, pharmaceutical agents targeting pathogenic microorganisms have been hampered by the growing of antimicrobial resistance threats. The idea of food therapy leads to extensive nutraceuticals research on the potential of exotic fruits such as N. lappaceum and N. ramboutan-ake to act as supplements. Phytochemicals such as phenolic compounds that present in the fruit act as potent antioxidants that contribute to the protective effects against diseases induced by oxidative stress. Fruit residuals such as the peel and seeds hold greater nutraceutical potential than the edible part. This review highlights the antioxidant and biological activities (anti-neoplastic, anti-microbial, hypoglycemic actions and anti-aging), and chemical contents of different parts of N. lappaceum and N. ramboutan-ake. These fruits contain a diverse and important chemical profile that can alleviate or cure diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Nephelium lappaceum; Nephelium ramboutan-ake; antioxidant; bioactive; chemical
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34834094 PMCID: PMC8620321 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26227005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Bioactive compounds from N. lappaceum peel.
| Compound | Group | References |
|---|---|---|
| Geraniin | Ellagitannin | Thitilertdecha et al. (2010) [ |
| Corilagin | Ellagitannin | Thitilertdecha et al. (2010) [ |
| Ellagic acid | Ellagitannin | Thitilertdecha et al. (2010) [ |
| p-coumaric | Hydroxycinnamic acid | Sun et al. (2012) [ |
| Caffeic acid | Hydroxycinnamic acid | Sun et al. (2012) [ |
| Syringic acid | Hydroxybenzoic acid | Sun et al. (2012) [ |
| Gallic acid | Hydroxybenzoic acid | Lee et al. (2020) [ |
| Quercetin | Flavonoid | Phuong et al. (2020) [ |
| Rutin | Flavonoid | Sun et al. (2012) [ |
Chemical compounds from N. lappaceum seeds.
| Compound | Group | References |
|---|---|---|
| Octadic-9-enoic acid | Fatty acid | Harahap et al. (2012) [ |
| icosanoic acid | Fatty acid | Harahap et al. (2012) [ |
| Kaempferol 3-O-β- | Flavonoid | Lee et al. (2020) [ |
| Kaempferol 3-O-β- | Flavonoid | |
| Kaempferol 3-O-α- | Flavonoid | |
| Kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside | Flavonoid | |
| Astragalin | Flavonoid | |
| Kaempferol 7-O-α- | Flavonoid |
Chemical compounds from N. lappaceum pulp.
| Compound | Group | References |
|---|---|---|
| Sucrose | Disaccharide | Chai et al. (2018) [ |
| Fructose | Monosaccharide | |
| Glucose | ||
| Citric acid | Organic acid | |
| Lactic acid | ||
| Ascorbic acid | Vitamin | Johnson et al. (2013) [ |
| Niacin | Johnson et al. (2013) [ | |
| Riboflavin | ||
| Thiamine |
List of antioxidant assays performed on N. lappaceum.
| Part | Solvent | TPC | Antioxidant Assay | ABTS * | FRAP * | DPPH * | % of Activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp | Ethanol | - | ABTSDPPH | - | - | - | 70 | Leong and Shui (2002) [ |
| Peel | Aqueous | 300.0 a | DPPH | 16.5 f | - | 18 f | 47.5 | Palanisamy et al. (2008) [ |
| Peel | Ether | 293.3 b | FRAP | - | - | 17.3 f | - | Thitilertdecha et al. (2008) [ |
| Peel | Ethanol | 213.76 a | FRAP | - | - | 3.55 f | - | Sun et al. (2012) [ |
| Peel | Methanol | 104.6 a | DPPH | - | - | - | Chunglok et al. (2014) [ | |
| Pulp | Aqueous | 223.75 c | DPPH | - | 96.85 h | - | 3.39 | Sulaiman and Ooi (2014) [ |
| Pulp | Ethanol | - | H2O2 scavenging assay | - | - | - | 25 | Chingsuwanrote et al. (2016) [ |
| Peel | Aqueous | 457.0 a | ABTS | 38.24 f | 0.203 i | - | - | Hernandez et al. (2017) [ |
| Peel | Ethanol | 487.67 a | ABTS | - | - | - | 92.50 | Mendez-Flores et al. (2018) [ |
| Peel | Methanol | - | ABTS | 0.76 f | 864.53 j | - | - | Mistriyani et al. (2018) [ |
| Peel | Ethanol | 244.00 a | DPPH | - | - | 24.99 f | 95.73 | Yunusa et al. (2018) [ |
| Peel | Methanol | 12.68 d | ABTS | 54.09 g | 66.05 k | 46.38 g | - | Nguyen et al. (2019) [ |
| Peel | Hydroalcoholic | 23.98 e | ABTS | 651.70 f | 1407.81 l | 9.72 f | 94.22 | Lopez et al. (2020) [ |
| Peel | Acidic 1% | 231 a | ABTS | - | - | - | - | Monrroy et al. (2020) [ |
| Peel | 80% Ethanol | 397.06 a | DPPH | - | - | 8.87 f | - | La et al. (2013) [ |
a In mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g; b in mg of catechin equivalents per g; c in µg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g; d in g of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per hundred g; e in mg per mL; f in µg per mL; g in g of trolox equivalents (TE) per hundred-g decimeter; h in µg of trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) per g; i in gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per mL; j in µg per mg; k in g ferrous (II) ion equivalent per hundred-gram decimeter; l in µmole per L. * Abbreviations: ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power; TPC: total phenolic compound.
List of anti-microbial tests performed on N. lappaceum.
| Part | Antimicrobial Activities | MIC | Zone of Inhibition (mm) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peel |
| 0.5 | 27 | Mohamed et al. (1994) [ |
| Peel |
| 62.5 | 7.75 | Thitilertdecha et al. (2008) [ |
| Peel | - | 20.2 | Tadtong et al. (2011) [ | |
| Peel |
| - | 10 | Sekar et al. (2014) [ |
| Seed |
| 15 | 12 | Bhat and Al-daihan (2014) [ |
| Peel |
| - | 14 | Nethaji et al. (2015) [ |
| Peel | - | 23.4 | Rostinawati et al. (2018) [ | |
| Leaf | - | 20.53 | Sulistiyaningsih et al. (2018) [ | |
| Peel |
| - | - | Phuong et al. (2020) [ |
List of antioxidant assays performed on N. ramboutan-ake.
| Part | Solvent | TPC | Antioxidant Assay | FRAP * | DPPH * | Galvinoxyl | Lipid Peroxidation (IC50) | H2O2 | % Activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp | Methanol | 433.78 a | - | - | - | - | - | 76.58 | Ikram et al. (2009) [ | |
| Leaf | Ethanol | 127.00 b | ABTS * | - | 0.24 f | 0.05 f | 0.30 f | - | - | Ling et al. (2010) [ |
| Pulp | Aqueous | 199.07 c | DPPH | 73.06 d | - | - | - | - | - | Sulaiman and Ooi (2014) [ |
| Peel | Methanol | 306.04 b | DPPH | - | 0.019 f | - | - | 0.153 f | - | Sukemi et al. (2015) [ |
| Peel | n- hexane | - | DPPH | - | >1000 g | - | - | - | 36.74 | Fadhli et al. (2018) [ |
| Peel | Ethanol | 1.00 b | DPPH | 0.476 e | - | - | - | - | 88.90 | Sopee et al. (2019) [ |
a In mg of gallic acid per hundred g; b in mg of gallic acid per g; c in µg of gallic acid per g; d in µg of trolox per g; e in mg of ferrous (II) ion per g; f in mg per mL; g in µg per mL. * Abbreviations: ABTS: 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power.
A comparison summary of studies conducted on N. lappaceum and N. ramboutan-ake.
| Aspects |
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | Pulp | Leaf | Rind/ Peel | Seed | Pulp | Leaf | Rind/ Peel | |
| Antioxidants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Anti-neoplastic |
|
|
| |||||
| Anti-microbial |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Hypoglycemic |
|
| ||||||
| Anti-aging |
|
|
| |||||