| Literature DB >> 34833989 |
Lei Wang1, Hyun-Soo Kim2, Jun-Geon Je3, Xiaoting Fu1, Caoxing Huang4, Ginnae Ahn5, Jae-Young Oh6, K K Asanka Sanjeewa7, Jiachao Xu1, Xin Gao1, In-Kyu Yeo3, You-Jin Jeon3,8.
Abstract
Skin is the largest organ of humans. Overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) is the primary environmental factor that causes skin damage. The compound, (-)-loliode, isolated from the brown seaweed Sargassum horneri, showed strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in in vitro and in vivo models. To further explore the potential of (-)-loliode in cosmetics, in the present study, we investigated the photoprotective effect of (-)-loliode in vitro in skin cells and in vivo in zebrafish. The results indicated that (-)-loliode significantly reduced intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level, improved cell viability, and suppressed apoptosis of UVB-irradiated human keratinocytes. In addition, (-)-loliode remarkably attenuated oxidative damage, improved collagen synthesis, and inhibited matrix metalloproteinases expression in UVB-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts. Furthermore, the in vivo test demonstrated that (-)-loliode effectively and dose-dependently suppressed UVB-induced zebrafish damage displayed in decreasing the levels of ROS, nitric oxide, lipid peroxidation, and cell death in UVB-irradiated zebrafish. These results indicate that (-)-loliode possesses strong photoprotective activities and suggest (-)-loliode may an ideal ingredient in the pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries.Entities:
Keywords: (-)-Loliode; MMPs; ROS; Sargassum horneri; UVB irradiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34833989 PMCID: PMC8620499 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26226898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of (-)-loliode.
Figure 2Protective effect of (-)-loliode against UVB-induced HaCaT cell damage. (A) Cytotoxicity of (-)-loliode on HaCaT cells; (B) intracellular ROS scavenging effect of (-)-loliode in UVB-irradiated HaCaT cells; (C) protective effect of (-)-loliode on UVB-induced cell death in HaCaT cells. Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay and intracellular ROS levels were measured by the DCF-DA assay. The data was expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). ** p < 0.01 as compared to the UVB-irradiated group and ## p < 0.01 as compared to the control group.
Figure 3Protective effect of (-)-loliode against UVB-induced apoptosis in HaCaT cells. The apoptotic body formation was evaluated by Hoechst 33342 staining assay.
Figure 4Protective effect of (-)-loliode against UVB-induced HDF cells damage. (A) Cytotoxicity of (-)-loliode on HDF cells; (B) intracellular ROS scavenging effect of (-)-loliode in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (C) protective effect of (-)-loliode on UVB-induced cell death in HDF cells. Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay and intracellular ROS level was measured by the DCF-DA assay. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 as compared to the UVB-irradiated group, and ## p < 0.01 as compared to the control group.
Figure 5(-)-Loliode improves collagen content and inhibits the expression of MMPs in UVB-irradiated HDF cells. (A) Collagen contents in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (B) MMP-1 expression levels in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (C) MMP-2 expression levels in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (D) MMP-8 expression levels in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (E) MMP-9 expression levels in UVB-irradiated HDF cells; (F) MMP-13 expression levels in UVB-irradiated HDF cells. The amounts of collagen and MMPs were assessed using the ELISA kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. The data was expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). ** p < 0.01 as compared to the UVB-irradiated group and < 0.01 as compared to the control group.
Figure 6(-)-Loliode protects zebrafish against UVB-induced damage. (A) ROS generation of UVB-irradiated zebrafish; (B) cell death of UVB-irradiated zebrafish; (C) NO production of UVB-irradiated zebrafish; (D) lipid peroxidation of UVB-irradiated zebrafish. The relative fluorescence intensities of zebrafish were determined using Image J software. The data were expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 as compared to the UVB-irradiated group, and < 0.01 as compared to the control group.