| Literature DB >> 34833880 |
Dongjin Leng1, Yong Sheng1, Hengyu Wang1, Jianhua Wei1, Yixin Ou1, Zixin Deng1, Linquan Bai1, Qianjin Kang1.
Abstract
Mitomycin has a unique chemical structure and contains densely assembled functionalities with extraordinary antitumor activity. The previously proposed mitomycin C biosynthetic pathway has caused great attention to decipher the enzymatic mechanisms for assembling the pharmaceutically unprecedented chemical scaffold. Herein, we focused on the determination of acyl carrier protein (ACP)-dependent modification steps and identification of the protein-protein interactions between MmcB (ACP) with the partners in the early-stage biosynthesis of mitomycin C. Based on the initial genetic manipulation consisting of gene disruption and complementation experiments, genes mitE, mmcB, mitB, and mitF were identified as the essential functional genes in the mitomycin C biosynthesis, respectively. Further integration of biochemical analysis elucidated that MitE catalyzed CoA ligation of 3-amino-5-hydroxy-bezonic acid (AHBA), MmcB-tethered AHBA triggered the biosynthesis of mitomycin C, and both MitB and MitF were MmcB-dependent tailoring enzymes involved in the assembly of mitosane. Aiming at understanding the poorly characterized protein-protein interactions, the in vitro pull-down assay was carried out by monitoring MmcB individually with MitB and MitF. The observed results displayed the clear interactions between MmcB and MitB and MitF. The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor analysis further confirmed the protein-protein interactions of MmcB with MitB and MitF, respectively. Taken together, the current genetic and biochemical analysis will facilitate the investigations of the unusual enzymatic mechanisms for the structurally unique compound assembly and inspire attempts to modify the chemical scaffold of mitomycin family antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: acyl carrier protein; antitumor; glycosyltransferase; mitomycin; protein–protein interactions; reductase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34833880 PMCID: PMC8621148 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26226791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The varied chemical structures of mitomycins.
Figure 2HPLC analysis results of the genetic recombinant strains.
Figure 3The HPLC-MS analysis of the AHBA-CoA formation.
Figure 4The LC-MS analysis results of the apo- and holo-form of MmcB. (A) The retention time of the apo- and holo-form of MmcB by HPLC analysis. (B) The molecular weight of the apo-form MmcB. (C) The molecular weight of the holo-form MmcB.
Figure 5MitB catalyzed the glycosylation of MmcB-tethered AHBA. (A) ESI-MS analysis of the formation of MmcB-AHBA. (B) ESI-MS analysis of the formation of MmcB-AHBA-GlcNA. (C) The determination of the interaction between MitB and MmcB by Biacore biosensor assay.
Figure 6The determination of the interaction between MitF and MmcB by Biacore biosensor assay.