| Literature DB >> 34830396 |
Vuyelwa Ncapayi1,2, Neethu Ninan3,4, Thabang C Lebepe1,2, Sundararajan Parani1,2, Aswathy Ravindran Girija4, Richard Bright3, Krasimir Vasilev3,4, Rodney Maluleke1,2, Ncediwe Tsolekile1,2, Tetsuya Kodama5, Oluwatobi S Oluwafemi1,2.
Abstract
The link between the microbiome and cancer has led researchers to search for a potential probe for intracellular targeting of bacteria and cancer. Herein, we developed near infrared-emitting ternary AgInSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) for dual bacterial and cancer imaging. Briefly, water-soluble AgInSe/ZnS QDs were synthesized in a commercial kitchen pressure cooker. The as-synthesized QDs exhibited a spherical shape with a particle diameter of 4.5 ± 0.5 nm, and they were brightly fluorescent with a photoluminescence maximum at 705 nm. The QDs showed low toxicity against mouse mammary carcinoma (FM3A-Luc), mouse colon carcinoma (C26), malignant fibrous histiocytoma-like (KM-Luc/GFP) and prostate cancer cells, a greater number of accumulations in Staphylococcus aureus, and good cellular uptake in prostate cancer cells. This work is an excellent step towards using ternary QDs for diagnostic and guided therapy for prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Gram-negative bacteria; Gram-positive bacteria; bioimaging; near infra-red quantum dots; prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34830396 PMCID: PMC8619584 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(a) TEM micrograph, and (b) particle size distribution (c) XRD of the as synthesized AgInSe/ZnS QDs.
Figure 2(a) Photoluminescence & UV absorption spectra (with images insert under normal and UV light at 365 nm), (b) Zeta potential spectra, (c) XPS survey spectra, and (d) high-resolution C1s spectra of AgInSe/ZnS QDs.
Figure 3Cytotoxicity of AgInSe/ZnS QDs against (a) FM3A-Luc, (b) C26, (c) KM-Luc GFP, and (d) summary at different concentrations. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test for * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01, and **** p < 0.0001, compared to control.
Figure 4Confocal microscopy images showing the uptake of AgInSe/ZnS QDs in (A) Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive bacteria) and (B) Escherichia coli (Gram-negative bacteria). (C) A possible mechanism for the differential uptake of AgInSe/ZnS QDs in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Figure 5Total corrected fluorescence intensity of AgInSe/ZnS QDs in (a) Gram-negative Escherichia coli (EC) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (SA); (b) prostate cells PNT, PC3, and LNCaP. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test for * p < 0.1 and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 6(A) Confocal microscopy images showing the uptake of AgInSe/ZnS QDs in prostate normal cells (PNT), prostate cancer cells (PC3), and human prostate adenocarcinoma cells (LNCaP). (B) Possible mechanism for the differential uptake of QDs in cancer and normal cells.
Scheme 1(A) Schematic illustration to show the synthesis of AgInSe/ZnS QDs and (B) application of AgInSe/ZnS QDs in cell tracking or imaging.