| Literature DB >> 34827713 |
Yuhui Wu1,2, Zhengyu Li3, Yuesuo Yang1,2, Diane Purchase4, Ying Lu1,2, Zhenxue Dai1.
Abstract
Heavy metal contamination in groundwater is a serious environmental problem. Many microorganisms that survive in subsurface porous media also produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), but little is known about the effect of these EPS on the fate and transport of heavy metals in aquifers. In this study, EPS extracted from soil with a steam method were used to study the adsorption behaviors of Cu2+ and Cd2+, employing quartz sand as a subsurface porous medium. The results showed that EPS had a good adsorption capacity for Cu2+ (13.5 mg/g) and Cd2+ (14.1 mg/g) that can be viewed using the Temkin and Freundlich models, respectively. At a pH value of 6.5 ± 0.1 and a temperature of 20 °C, EPS showed a greater affinity for Cu2+ than for Cd2+. The binding force between EPS and quartz sand was weak. The prior saturation of the sand media with EPS solution can significantly promote the migration of the Cu2+ and Cd2+ in sand columns by 8.8% and 32.1%, respectively. When treating both metals simultaneously, the migration of Cd2+ was found to be greater than that of Cu2+. This also demonstrated that EPS can promote the co-migration of Cu2+ and Cd2+ in saturated porous media.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; extracellular polymeric substances; heavy metals; migration; porous media; simulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34827713 PMCID: PMC8615540 DOI: 10.3390/biom11111715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Heavy metals in the subsurface environment: sources, migration, and their interactions with extracellular polymeric substances (EPS).
Adsorption of heavy metals (HMs) on extracellular polymeric substances (EPS).
| The Sources of Microorganisms | Microorganisms Types | The Kind of Metal | Adsorption Capacity or Adsorption Efficiency | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wastewater sludge systems | Hg(II) | 2597.62 mg/g ( | [ | |
| Aqueous environment |
| Pb2+, Cd2+, and Ni2+ | 94.67% (Pb2+), 94.41% (Cd2+), 77.95% (Ni2+) | [ |
| Wastewater treat plant |
| Cu2+, Zn2+ | 899.1 mg/g EPS for Cu2+, 932.1 mg/g EPS for Zn2+ | [ |
| - |
| Cu(II), Cd(II) | 40 mg/g EPS for Cu(II), 85.5 mg/g EPS for Cd(II) | [ |
| Activated sludge in municipal wastewater treatment plants | Pb(II) | 99.5 mg/g | [ |
Parameter setting of EPS and heavy metal adsorption experiment.
| No. | Concentration of Cu (mg/L) | Concentration of Cd (mg/L) | Contact Time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 0 | 5, 15, 30, 50, 70, 100, 120, 240, 360, 720 |
| 2 | 5, 10, 15, 25, 40 | 0 | 720 |
| 3 | 0 | 7 | 5, 15, 30, 50, 70, 100, 240, 720 |
| 4 | 0 | 10, 20, 30, 50, 80 | 720 |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | 720 |
| 6 | 0 | 7 | 720 |
| 7 | 5 | 7 | 720 |
Figure 2Schematic diagram of experimental device for the EPS/HMs breakthrough: (A) HMs breakthrough with EPS; (B) HMs breakthrough without EPS. PV—Pore volume; V—Velocity of flow.
Parameter setting of migration experiment.
| No. | Hyperpure | EPS (PV) | Cu2+ (PV) | Cd2+ (PV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 13 | - | - |
| 2 | 4 | 13 | 10 | - |
| 2 * | 17 | - | 10 | - |
| 3 | 4 | 13 | - | 10 |
| 3 * | 17 | - | - | 10 |
| 4 | 4 | 13 | 5 | 5 |
| 4 * | 4 | - | 5 | 5 |
* Corresponding control group. PV—Pore volume.
Figure 3(A) Effect of dialysis on the content of EPS composition and the percentage of components of EPS after dialysis, (B) experimental results of adsorption (adsorption of different concentrations of EPS on quartz sand), (C) effect of coexisting ions on the adsorption of heavy metals by EPS, and (D) the influence of EPS on the adsorption of quartz sand with Cu2+ and Cd2+.
Model parameters of the EPS adsorption of Cu2+ and Cd2+.
| Isothermal Adsorption Model | Pseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freundlich Constants | Linear Model Constants | Temkin Constants | |||||||||
| K | n | R2 | K | R2 | K | R2 | Qe,exp | K | R2 | Qe,cal | |
| Cu2+ | 14.02 | 1.409 | 0.904 | 3.908 | 0.883 | 44.704 | 0.963 | 20.79 | 2.208 | 0.993 | 13.46 |
| Cd2+ | 0.372 | 0.697 | 0.974 | 2.327 | 0.956 | 66.496 | 0.894 | 15.93 | −0.568 | 0.997 | 14.06 |
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectra of quartz sand under different migration conditions: (A) original sample prior to the experiment; (B) EPS breakthrough; (C,D) breakthrough of EPS + Cu and the corresponding EDS spectra; (E,F) breakthrough of EPS + Cu + Cd and the corresponding EDS spectra.
Figure 5Migration experiments carried out on EPS and metal ions under different conditions: (A,B) migration of Cu/Cd in the presence or absence of EPS; (C,D) effect of Cu and Cd co-migration in the presence of EPS.
Figure 6Schematic representation of Cu migration mechanism in saturated porous strata.