Literature DB >> 28174558

Environmental Origin of the Genus Bordetella.

Illiassou Hamidou Soumana1, Bodo Linz2, Eric T Harvill3.   

Abstract

Members of the genus Bordetella include human and animal pathogens that cause a variety of respiratory infections, including whooping cough in humans. Despite the long known ability to switch between a within-animal and an extra-host lifestyle under laboratory growth conditions, no extra-host niches of pathogenic Bordetella species have been defined. To better understand the distribution of Bordetella species in the environment, we probed the NCBI nucleotide database with the 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequences from pathogenic Bordetella species. Bacteria of the genus Bordetella were frequently found in soil, water, sediment, and plants. Phylogenetic analyses of their 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that Bordetella recovered from environmental samples are evolutionarily ancestral to animal-associated species. Sequences from environmental samples had a significantly higher genetic diversity, were located closer to the root of the phylogenetic tree and were present in all 10 identified sequence clades, while only four sequence clades possessed animal-associated species. The pathogenic bordetellae appear to have evolved from ancestors in soil and/or water. We show that, despite being animal-adapted pathogens, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Bordetella hinzii have preserved the ability to grow and proliferate in soil. Our data implicate soil as a probable environmental origin of Bordetella species, including the animal-pathogenic lineages. Soil may further constitute an environmental niche, allowing for persistence and dissemination of the bacterial pathogens. Spread of pathogenic bordetellae from an environmental reservoir such as soil may potentially explain their wide distribution as well as frequent disease outbreaks that start without an obvious infectious source.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bordetella; ecological niches; environmental origin; environmental strains; extra-host adaptation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28174558      PMCID: PMC5258731          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Bacteria of the genus Bordetella are of primary importance in human and veterinary medicine because of their ability to colonize the respiratory tract, causing a wide range of pulmonary and bronchial infections. The common human- and animal-adapted pathogens B. pertussis, B. parapertussis, and B. bronchiseptica are known as the “classical” Bordetella species. B. pertussis is a strictly human pathogen, but B. parapertussis consists of two lineages, one infecting humans and the other infecting sheep (Mattoo and Cherry, 2005). In contrast to these examples of adaptation to a single host, B. bronchiseptica colonizes a variety of animals and even humans (Register et al., 2015), resulting in a broad array of respiratory diseases, from asymptomatic colonization to lethal pneumonia (Goodnow, 1980). Phylogenetic analyses (Musser et al., 1986; Diavatopoulos et al., 2005) and genome comparisons (Parkhill et al., 2003) have revealed that B. pertussis and B. parapertussis represent human-adapted forms of B. bronchiseptica that have evolved independently from a B. bronchiseptica-like ancestor. The genus also contains a number of additional, more recently described species. For example, B. avium (Kersters et al., 1984) causes respiratory disease in birds. B. hinzii (Vandamme et al., 1995) is generally regarded as a non-pathogenic colonizer of the respiratory tract of poultry but some strains were shown to cause disease in turkeys when experimentally inoculated (Register and Kunkle, 2009). Meanwhile, the closely related species B. pseudohinzii colonizes laboratory mice (Ivanov et al., 2015, 2016). B. holmesii (Weyant et al., 1995) causes pertussis-like disease and septicemia in humans (Shepard et al., 2004), and B. bronchialis, B. flabilis, and B. sputigena (Vandamme et al., 2015) were also isolated from human respiratory specimens. In contrast to other bordetellae, B. trematum (Vandamme et al., 1996) and B. ansorpii (Ko et al., 2005) are not associated with respiratory problems but were isolated from human wound infection. B. petrii, a species originally isolated from a dechlorinating bioreactor enriched by river sediment, represents the first described environmental species within the Bordetella genus (von Wintzingerode et al., 2001). B. petrii strains were also found in marine sponges (Wang et al., 2007), grass root consortia (Wang et al., 2007), and in other environmental samples as members of microbial communities involved in the degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzenes (Bianchi et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007). In apparent conflict with its environmental source, the B. petrii genome contains genes that allow for the synthesis and secretion of factors specifically associated with the virulence of the pathogenic Bordetella sp., including the BvgAS master regulon and filamentous hemagglutinin (Gross et al., 2008). In addition to these environmental sources, B. petrii was also isolated from immunocompromised patients with ear infection, cystic fibrosis and chronic pulmonary disease (Fry et al., 2005; Biederman et al., 2015; Nagata et al., 2015), suggesting broad adaptability of this bacterial species to both environmental conditions and as an opportunistic pathogen of humans and possibly other animals. Other Bordetella species have been obtained from environments not associated with animal hosts. Ten different bacterial strains were cultured from cotton swabs taken from the plaster wall surface of 1300-year-old mural paintings inside the stone chamber of the Takamatsuzuka Tomb, an ancient circular burial mound in Japan. Taxonomic classification of these isolates revealed three novel species that were then named B. muralis, B. tumulicola, and B. tumbae (Tazato et al., 2015). Isolation of the bacteria from the paintings, but not from the surrounding stone walls, suggested that these species might be involved in the observed biodeterioration of the colorful paintings (Kigawa et al., 2013). According to their 16S rRNA gene sequences, other environmental bacteria from soil also belong to the genus Bordetella. Interestingly, the majority of those samples originated from contaminated sites such as soil polluted with chlorinated benzenes (Wang et al., 2007), from arctic soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as oil, diesel fuel or tar (Eriksson et al., 2003), from the sediment of a municipal wastewater plant (Nisola et al., 2010) and from arsenic polluted soils (Cavalca et al., 2010; Bachate et al., 2012). All these observations suggest that members of the Bordetella genus may have the potential for biodegradation of a great variety of organic compounds. Although these anecdotal findings suggest that members of the Bordetella genus may be found in nature, there is currently no systematic analysis of the occurrence of Bordetella outside human or animal hosts, and the potential impact of environmental isolates on human and animal health is uncertain. Environmental niches of pathogenic Bordetella species have been proposed but not identified. Yet, the ability of Bordetella to survive and persist outside mammalian hosts would allow for its greater dissemination and persistence, and could contribute to a wide distribution of infections and disease, often without an obvious infectious source. Here, we search the NCBI nucleotide database for 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences of Bordetella-like microorganisms from various environments and compare them to those of the described species, including the classical bordetellae, to determine their phylogenetic relatedness. We identified 10 clades of related strains, all of which contained samples isolated from environmental sources, though only four clades also contained sequences from animal-associated species. Sequences from environmental samples had a significantly higher genetic diversity and were located closer to the root of the phylogenetic tree than those from animal-associated isolates, suggesting an environmental origin of the genus Bordetella. In addition, we show that the animal-adapted pathogens B. bronchiseptica and B. hinzii grow efficiently in soil extract, indicating that diverse pathogenic bordetellae may have retained the ability to proliferate in the environment.

Materials and methods

Search for Bordetella 16S rRNA gene sequences in the NCBI nt database

The16S ribosomal gene sequences of Bordetella hinzii strain LMG 13501 (GenBank accession number NR_027537.1); Bordetella holmesii strain ATCC 51541 (NR_121717.1); and Bordetella pertussis strain Tohama I (AF142326.1) were each used as queries for BLAST search (blastn) against the NCBI nr/nt database using the default search parameters with a hitlist size of 5000. From the numerous hits, we excluded sequences of isolates from the known species that are mentioned in the introduction and selected only those that showed higher percentage of similarity to known Bordetella species than to bacteria from any other genus, including Achromobacter. As a control, we ran blastn searches with each of the identified sequences against the NCBI nr/nt database to remove potential false positives. The remaining sequences, all of which were from bacteria obtained from environmental sources, were considered for further analysis. All three searches using 16S rRNA sequences of B. pertussis, B. hinzii, and B. holmesii as queries, respectively, gave consistent results. The accession numbers were then explored for details on sample source, year of isolation, and associated publications. Most sequences were described as Bordetella sp. in the gene description, but some were designated as “uncultured bacterium.”

Phylogenetic analysis and tree construction

All 16S rRNA sequences were aligned in Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/), and the alignment was checked manually for consistency. Only sequences containing a 1376 bp gene fragment (near full-length) were used for further analyses. In order to identify the closely related species of environmental Bordetella isolates, the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences of members of 16 named Bordetella species were used as references; namely B. pertussis Tohama I, B. parapertussis BPP5, B. bronchiseptica RB50, B. avium 197N, B. hinzii LMG 13501, B. pseudohinzii 8-296-03, B. holmesii ATCC 51541, B. trematum DSM 11334, B. ansorpii SMC-8986, B. bronchialis LMG 28640, B. sputigena LMG 28641, B. flabilis LMG 28642, B. petrii Se-1111R, B. muralis T6220-3-2b, B. tumulicola T6517-1-4b, and B. tumbae T6713-1-3b (Table 1). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of Burkholderia pseudomallei NCTC13179 and Ralstonia solanacearum YP-01 were used as outgroups. The aligned and trimmed sequences (one per unique sequence) were used to generate a Neighbor-joining tree using the Maximum Composite Likelihood algorithm in Mega (Tamura et al., 2007), and bootstrap support was estimated running 100,000 replications. Nucleotide diversity (Π) within environmental samples and within animal-associated samples were estimated in DnaSP (Librado and Rozas, 2009), and 95% confidence limits (Π95) were estimated using an online confidence limit calculator (https://www.allto.co.uk/tools/statistic-calculators/confidence-interval-for-mean-calculator/).
Table 1

Reference strains of named .

Strain nameReferencesGenBank accession number16S rRNA sequence length (bp)
Burkholderia pseudomallei NCTC 13179Johnson et al., 2015CP003976.11487
Ralstonia solanacearum YP-01NCBIFJ494776.11500
Bordetella avium 197NSebaihia et al., 2006NR_074639.11487
Bordetella bronchiseptica RB50Parkhill et al., 2003BX640447.11487
Bordetella hinzii LMG 13501Kattar et al., 2000NR_027537.11487
Bordetella parapertussis BPP5Park et al., 2012HE965803.11489
Bordetella holmesii ATCC 51541NCBINR_121717.11487
Bordetella pertussis Tohama IParkhill et al., 2003AF142326.11487
Bordetella trematum DSM 11334von Wintzingerode et al., 2001NR_025404.11521
Bordetella flabilis LMG 28642Vandamme et al., 2015EU082162.11376
Bordetella bronchialis LMG 28640Vandamme et al., 2015EU082135.11416
Bordetella sputigena LMG 28641Vandamme et al., 2015KF601914.11376
Bordetella ansorpii SMC-8986Ko et al., 2005AY594190.11424
Bordetella pseudohinzii 8-296-03Ivanov et al., 2016JHEP02000033.11542
Bordetella petrii DSMZ12804Gross et al., 2008NC_0101701487
Bordetella muralis T6220-3-2bTazato et al., 2015LC053647.11456
Bordetella tumbae T6713-1-3bTazato et al., 2015LC053656.11456
Bordetella tumulicola T6517-1-4bTazato et al., 2015LC053650.11456
Reference strains of named .

Soil sample collection and Bordetella growth in soil extract

Soils were sampled in April 2016 at two random sites in State College, Pennsylvania, near a suburban park (40°48′40.7″ N 77°53′06.1″ W and 40°48′38.2″ N 77°53′04.2″ W). Each sample was collected to a depth of 20 cm and thoroughly mixed. Fifty grams of each soil sample (100 g total) was placed in a bottle which was filled to 500 ml with sterile PBS. The sample was homogenized by shaking for 10 min, then left to settle for 1 h at room temperature and carefully decanted. The soil-PBS suspension was filter sterilized. Single colonies of B. bronchiseptica strain RB50, B. hinzii strain L60, and B. petrii strain DSMZ12804 were picked from Bordet-Gengou (BG) agar (Difco) plates supplemented with 10% defibrinated Sheep's blood (HemoStat Laboratories, Dixon, CA, USA) and were cultured in liquid Stainer-Scholte medium (Stainer and Scholte, 1970) overnight at 37°C. The Bordetella inocula were prepared as follows. The cultures were centrifuged, resuspended in 1 ml PBS, and the optical density (OD600) was determined. Following five consecutive 10-fold dilutions in 1 ml PBS, 100 μl (= 106-fold dilution) containing ~150 (B. petrii) or 240 bacterial cells (B. hinzii or B. bronchiseptica) were added to 5 ml of the soil extract resulting in starting concentrations of ~30 bacterial cells/ml (B. petrii) and 48 bacterial cells/ml (B. hinzii, B. bronchiseptica). Bacterial numbers were determined by plating an aliquot of each inoculum. The culture tubes were incubated at room temperature (25°C) with shaking. After 24, 48, and 72 h, 100 μl of each culture was plated on BG agar supplemented with 10% defibrinated sheep's blood to determine bacterial numbers. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. The mean and ± standard error as well as analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted using Graphpad Prism version 6.04. The bacterial doubling time was calculated by the formula: doubling time = ln(2)/ln(N(t)/N(0))/t, where N(t) is the number of bacterial cells at time t, N(0) is the number of bacteria at time 0 and t is the time in hours.

Results

Bordetella in the environment

We mined the NCBI nucleotide databases for Bordetella spp. 16S rRNA gene sequences. The search resulted in a total of 71 Bordetella spp. 16S rRNA gene sequences (Table 2) in addition to those from the named species (Table 1) B. bronchiseptica, B. parapertussis, B. pertussis, B. hinzii, B. pseudohinzii, B. holmesii, B. avium, B. trematum, B. ansorpii, B. flabilis, B. bronchealis, B. sputigena (isolated from samples of human/animal origin), B. petrii, B. tumbae, B. muralis, and B. tumulicola (isolated from environmental samples). The corresponding strains were recovered from different environmental niches (Table 2), including soil (52 strains) and water (11 strains), and from 8 strains associated with plants. The soil samples were of diverse origin, including compost, cave rocks, and metal mines, but the majority were sampled at sites contaminated with oil and several halogenated cyclic hydrocarbons such as chlorinated benzenes or hexachlorocyclohexane. The samples from aquatic environments were also of diverse origin, namely industrial wastewater, a sulfur spring, lake water, surface sea water, and river biofilms. Several samples from plants were isolated from roots and thus at the plant-soil interface (Table 2). Thus, members of the genus Bordetella appear to be widespread across different environmental niches.
Table 2

.

Bordetella strainsIsolation sourceCountryReferencesGenBank accession No.Sequence length (bp)Duplicated sequences
SOIL ORIGIN
Bordetella sp. F2Chlorinated benzenes polluted soilGermanyWang et al., 2007DQ453689.115274
Bordetella sp. E3Chlorinated benzenes polluted soilGermanyWang et al., 2007DQ453688.115274
Bordetella sp. QJ2–5Chlorinated benzenes polluted soilChinaNCBIDQ152013.113934
Bordetella sp. 2b05HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979304.11523
Bordetella sp. 2f06HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979347.11523
Bordetella sp. 2e11HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979341.11522
Bordetella sp. 1h08HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979288.11519
Bordetella sp. 1c11HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979241.11521
Bordetella sp. 2c11HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979320.11523
Bordetella sp. 2a09HCH-contaminated soilIndiaNCBIJF979298.11519
Bordetella sp. ud11,2,4-TCB contaminated soilGermanyNCBIFJ529833.115234
Bordetella sp. ud291,2,4-TCB contaminated soilGermanyNCBIFJ529848.11523
Bordetella sp. ud3b1,2,4-TCB contaminated soilGermanyNCBIFJ529835.115234
Bordetella sp. ud13a1,2,4-TCB contaminated soilGermanyNCBIFJ529840.11525
Bordetella sp. IITR021,2,4-TCB contaminated soilIndiaNCBIEU752498.11422
Bordetella sp. CTN-10Chemical factory soilChinaNCBIFJ598334.113982
Bordetella sp. 2–12Chemical factory soilChinaNCBIFJ598328.114102
Bordetella sp. CTN-16Chemical factory soilChinaNCBIFJ598326.114124
Bordetella sp. C16-Siri112Oil-contaminated soilIranNCBIJX500276.113975
Bordetella sp. p23(2011)Magnetite drainage, Iron mineChinaNCBIHQ652588.11518
Bordetella sp. e3(2011)Magnetite drainage, Iron mineChinaNCBIHQ652587.115013
Bordetella sp. d16(2011)Magnetite drainage, Iron mineChinaNCBIHQ652589.115073
Bordetella sp. f17(2011)Magnetite drainage, Iron mineChinaNCBIHQ652590.11520
Bordetella sp. FB-8Creek sediment from former uranium-mining areaGermanyNCBIJN885794.11385
Bordetella sp. A2–436Uranium minePortugalNCBIKF441609.11528
Bordetella sp. J4Acid mine drainageFranceDelavat et al., 2013HF568988.11410
Bordetella sp. BAB-4396SoilIndiaNCBIKM289182.11499
Bordetella sp. B4Paddy field by yellow riverChinaNCBIEU140499.11523
Bordetella sp. MCYF11Lake Taihu sedimentChinaYang et al., 2014KC734882.11385
Bordetella sp. PTG4–17Sediment of the Indian oceanIndiaNCBIEU603444.11496
Bordetella sp. RCC3Caves rockIndiaNCBIKC119149.11476
Bordetella sp. RCC4Caves rockIndiaNCBIKC119150.11464
Bordetella sp. M1–6CompostChinaKato et al., 2004AB039335.11531
Bordetella sp. FS1413CompostFinlandPartanen et al., 2010FN667145.11464
Bordetella sp. SMG22CompostChinaGuo et al., 2015AM930282.114916
Bordetella sp. OT-2-E7CompostChinaTian et al., 2013JQ337611.113976
Bordetella sp. strain 2ABA4Solid waste dumpsitesNigeriaSanuth et al., 2013HE858274.11168
Bordetella sp. OS17Benten-Cho station soilJapanMatsumura et al., 2009AB453298.1980
Bordetella sp. VVARSoilJapanNCBIFJ588707.11451
Bordetella sp. Ds-4Cultivated soilIndiaNCBIHQ857791.1727
Bordetella sp. R-8Garden soilIndiaNCBIJX130378.11319
Bordetella sp. SPB-24Garden soilIndiaBachate et al., 2012JN208922.11403
Bordetella sp. As3–3Arsenic contaminated soilItalyCavalca et al., 2010FN392624.2544
Bordetella sp. AGO-03Arsenic contaminated rice fieldIndiaNCBIAB696982.1979
Bordetella sp. ADP-18Arsenic contaminated rice fieldsIndiaNCBIAB697485.1674
Bordetella sp. C16-Siri108Oil-contaminated soilIranNCBIJX500272.11069
Bordetella sp. C16-Siri113Oil-contaminated soilIranNCBIJX500277.11295
Bordetella sp. BF07B02Agricultural soilBurkina FasoColinon et al., 2013KC195878.11381
Bordetella sp. HPC772Activated sludge of an effluent treatment plantIndiaNCBIAY838357.1580
Bordetella sp. PH21Phenolic compounds-contaminated sedimentChinaNCBIJN171686.1721
Bordetella sp. PH22Phenolic compounds-contaminated sedimentChinaNCBIJN171687.1721
Bordetella sp. VKRKCd3Seashore surface sedimentIndiaNCBIGQ262759.1363
PLANT ORIGIN
Bordetella sp. CCBAU 10842Maize rhizosphereChinaNCBIJF772555.11369
Bordetella sp. R8–804Jatropha curcas L, plant rootSingaporeNCBIJQ659985.11487
Bordetella sp. R8–551Jatropha curcas L, plant rootSingaporeNCBIJQ659951.11486
Bordetella sp. S2–5-CL23velvetleaf seedUSANCBIEU769148.11492
Bordetella sp. S318(2010)M. sinensis × giganteus internal stem tissueIrelandNCBIHM102497.1600
Bordetella sp. Juv992Lupine cluster rootsSwitzerlandWeisskopf et al., 2011JN590346.11302
Bordetella sp. PnB 4PepperIndiaNCBIJQ886795.1370
Bordetella sp. RS-CIW-47Maize rhizospherePakistanNCBIKC430988.1950
WATER ORGIN
Bordetella sp. MT-I2Industrial wastewaterGermanyToups et al., 2010EU727195.115261
Bordetella sp. MT-E1Industrial wastewaterGermanyToups et al., 2010EU727194.115251
Bordetella sp. TS-T34Lake waterChinaNCBIKC762319.11398
Bordetella sp. CC-PW-55Surface seawaterTaiwanNCBIKF851340.11500
Bordetella sp. 13.1 KSSMineral oil-based metalworking fluidGermanyLodders and Kämpfer, 2012HE575910.11398
Bordetella sp. HT19Sulfur springIndiaNCBIFJ969843.11404
Bordetella sp. HF38River biofilmsChinaNCBIKR188914.11523
Bordetella sp. HF72River biofilmsChinaNCBIKR188948.11523
Bordetella sp. MMJ09Distillery wastewaterChinaNCBIGU244378.1813
Bordetella sp. Sulf-8Municipal wastewaterSouth KoreaNisola et al., 2010GU812430.11314
Bordetella sp. IPJ1Rusted iron pipe in freshwater lakeIndiaNCBIHM593901.11100

In bold are the strains for which the length of the 16S ribosomal RNA sequence were at least 1376 bp, and were included in the phylogenetic tree construction.

. In bold are the strains for which the length of the 16S ribosomal RNA sequence were at least 1376 bp, and were included in the phylogenetic tree construction.

16S rRNA gene sequence clades are associated with particular environmental niches

To relate the environmental isolates to known Bordetella species, we aligned the 16S rRNA gene sequences and constructed a Neighbor-joining tree using the Maximum-likelihood algorithm implemented in Mega (Tamura et al., 2007). Forty-eight sequences from environmental samples were of sufficient length and used for further analyses (Table 2). Of those, 36 originated from soil (27 haplotypes), eight from aquatic environments (7 haplotypes), and four from plants (4 haplotypes). The tree was rooted with sequences of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Ralstonia solanacearum as outgroups. The Bordetella sequences formed 10 distinct clusters (Figure 1). While most clusters contained at least one described species, such as B. petrii in cluster VI or B. tumbae/B. muralis in cluster V, several Bordetella sequences did not cluster with any described species but rather occupied distinct branches of the tree. These include the two isolates in cluster IV, the isolates from soil samples in clusters VII and X and strains B. sp. CC-PW-55 and B. sp. TS-T34 (cluster IX) isolated from surface sea water and lake water, respectively (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Neighbor-Joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of animal-associated and environmental strains of . The 52 near full-length sequences (1376 bp) formed 10 clades (I–X) of phylogenetically closely related Bordetella isolates/species recovered from soil (brown), water (blue), plants (green) and animals (black). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the beta-proteobacteria Burkholderia pseudomallei and Ralstonia solanacearum were used as outgroups.

Neighbor-Joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of animal-associated and environmental strains of . The 52 near full-length sequences (1376 bp) formed 10 clades (I–X) of phylogenetically closely related Bordetella isolates/species recovered from soil (brown), water (blue), plants (green) and animals (black). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the beta-proteobacteria Burkholderia pseudomallei and Ralstonia solanacearum were used as outgroups. Superimposing the origin of the Bordetella spp. isolates revealed that most of the identified clusters were dominated by sequences of similar environmental/host origin. Thus, cluster I was composed of sequences of B. holmesii and the classical bordetellae (B. bronchiseptica, B. parapertussis, and B. pertussis), all of which were isolated from human and animal infection, but also contained B. sp. HT38 isolated from a river biofilm in China (Figure 1, Table 2). Cluster III contained sequences of species isolated from human respiratory specimen (B. sputigena, B. bronchialis, and B. flabilis) plus an isolate from soil in India. Other clusters either contained, or were dominated by, sequences of environmental origin such as cluster IV (water and soil), cluster V (soil), including the three species recovered from mural paintings B. tumbae, B. tumulicola, and B. muralis; but also B. sp. CCBAU from a maize rhizosphere and B. ansorpii from infection of an immunocompromised patient, and cluster VI (soil, including the environmental species B. petrii). The prominent exception to this pattern, cluster II, contained sequences from animal/human infection (B. avium, B. hinzii, B. pseudohinzii, and B. trematum) as well as from water (B. sp. MT-E1, B. sp. HF27), plant root (B. sp. R8–804, B. sp. R8–551), and soil samples (B. sp. BAB-4396). However, the other clusters were either dominated by animal-associated samples (clusters I and III) or samples of environmental origin (all other clusters). If the genus Bordetella were of environmental origin, samples isolated from soil and water would be expected to be more diverse and would appear widespread across the tree. Indeed, environmental samples were present in all sequence clusters. In contrast, sequences from animal-associated samples were confined to four clusters, all of which also contained environmental isolates. Three of those four clusters formed a single super clade which originated from one of several clades among sequences from environmental isolates. In contrast, all clusters near the tree root exclusively contained environmental samples, but no animal associated samples (Figure 1). The phylogenetic analyses showed that the genetic diversity was significantly higher in sequences from environmental samples (Π95 = 2.02–2.13%) than in sequences from animal-associated samples (Π95 = 1.30–1.53%). The sequence of branching events within the phylogenetic tree is consistent with an environmental origin of Bordetella and subsequent adaptation of some lineages to animal hosts.

Bordetella bronchiseptica and Bordetella hinzii are capable of growing in soil extract

Since most environmental Bordetella samples were recovered from soil (and water), we hypothesized that pathogenic, animal-associated species may have retained the ability to thrive in soil as an environmental niche. Therefore, we assessed the ability of B. bronchiseptica strain RB50, B. hinzii strain L60, and B. petrii strain DSMZ12804, to grow in a sterile, homogenized suspension made from soil. Instead of growing pathogenic bordetellae directly on solid soil, we prepared a soil suspension to extract possible nutrients but to avoid solid matter which allowed visual monitoring of bacterial growth and selection of appropriate sampling time points. All three isolates were cultured at room temperature (25°C) with shaking in either liquid soil extract or in Stainer-Scholte (SS) medium as a control. All three species grew fast in SS medium with doubling times of 1.8 ± 0.02 h (B. bronchiseptica), 1.9 ± 0.01 h (B. hinzii), and 1.9 ± 0.02 h (B. petrii), and reached the stationary phase prior to 48 h post-inoculation (Figure 2). As expected from an environmental bacterium, B. petrii strain DSMZ12804 thrived when inoculated into a soil extract, with a doubling time of 7.25 ± 0.24 h (Figure 2). Surprisingly, both B. hinzii strain L60 with a doubling time of 6.4 ± 0.09 h and B. bronchiseptica strain RB50 with a doubling time of 4.0 ± 0.04 h grew in the soil extract faster than B. petrii. Thus, all three species can grow efficiently at 25°C on filter-sterilized soil extract, even though the growth rate was slower than in Stainer-Scholte medium.
Figure 2

Growth of . All three bacterial species efficiently grow in a sterile-filtered soil suspension suggesting that soil may represent an environmental niche for pathogenic Bordetella species.

Growth of . All three bacterial species efficiently grow in a sterile-filtered soil suspension suggesting that soil may represent an environmental niche for pathogenic Bordetella species.

Discussion

Bacteria of the genus Bordetella occupy remarkably diverse ecological niches, ranging from soil, water, and plants, to the respiratory tracts of a wide variety of animals including humans. Several environmental Bordetella strains were isolated from soils polluted with oil and oil derivatives (Table 2), including halogenated polycyclic hydrocarbons (Eriksson et al., 2003; Bianchi et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007). Other strains were found in garden soil, compost, and various sediments suggesting these organisms are quite adaptable to diverse sites. The only sequenced and analyzed genome of an environmental isolate, B. petrii strain DSMZ 12804, revealed a possible genomic basis for substantial metabolic versatility (Gross et al., 2008). The genome encodes multiple auxiliary pathways for the utilization of a variety of nutrients, including pectate, numerous sugar derivatives from degraded plant products and various aromatic compounds. Five of the eight genomic islands that have been identified in this genome contain genes coding for enzymes for the metabolism of aromatic compounds, particularly clusters of genes encoding enzymes of the chlorocatechol pathway, including gene clusters that show high similarity to genes in a 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene-degrading Pseudomonas strain (Gross et al., 2008). The presence of multiple chlorocatechol gene clusters in addition to several different central pathways for aromatic metabolism may provide a competitive advantage for growth in contaminated environments. Another striking feature of environmental Bordetella isolates is their resistance to heavy metals (Cavalca et al., 2010). Ten out of 52 soil samples (Table 2) were isolated from iron mines (e.g., B. sp. d16, B. sp. f17), from uranium mines (B. sp. FB-8, B. sp. A2–436), or from soil polluted with arsenic (e.g., B. sp. As3–3). Such remarkable metal tolerance is most likely conferred by heavy metal resistance systems. Indeed, the genome of B. petrii strain DSMZ 12804 contains several heavy metal resistance operons on a genomic island absent from the genomes of other sequenced bordetellae, whereas other strains contain different islands of genes. Ultimately, the presence of multiple heavy metal resistance systems may allow environmental Bordetella isolates to thrive in metal rich environments. Most plant-associated Bordetella strains were recovered from roots (B. sp. R8–804, B. sp. R8–551, B. sp. Juv992) and the rhizosphere at the plant-soil interface (B. sp. CCBAU 10842). Thus, these isolates may in fact represent soil samples or, alternatively, may be involved in interactions with plants at the plant-soil interface. The resemblance between plant responses to bacterial virulence factors and the responses of mammalian immune cells (Berg et al., 2005) serve as evidence that bacteria-plant interactions may have paved the way for bacterial adaptation to animals. In this regard, plant-root isolates B. sp. R8–804 and B. sp. R8–551 from plant roots are closely related to bird pathogens, B. hinzii and B. avium, supporting the view that plants cells could serve as a “training ground” for environmental strains that eventually gain the ability to colonize animal hosts (Berg et al., 2005). In addition to these plant root isolates, several other environmental isolates were also found to be very closely related to animal-associated pathogens (Figure 1). Interestingly, those strains were isolated from very diverse sources, namely (polluted) soil in India (B. sp. BAB-4396, B. sp. IITR02), industrial waste water (B. sp. MT-E1), and oil-based metal-working emulsion in Germany (B. sp. 13.1 KSS), as well as from river biofilms in China (B. sp. HF38 and B. sp. HF72). The two isolates from a river biofilm in China are of particular interest. The 16S rRNA sequence of one of those (strain HF72) showed 99.56% sequence similarity to that of the human pathogen B. trematum (6 SNPs). According to 16S rRNA gene sequence, the other isolate (B. sp. HF38) is even more closely related (99.78%, three SNPs) to the animal pathogen B. bronchiseptica strain RB50 and the human pathogen B. parapertussis strain 12822, which share an identical sequence in this gene. By this measure, isolate HF38 is as closely related to B. bronchiseptica strain RB50 and B. parapertussis strain 12822 as it is to B. pertussis. This exceptionally close phylogenetic relatedness makes several evolutionary scenarios conceivable. First, isolate B. sp. HF38 may be an environmental, non-pathogenic strain closely related to the animal/human pathogens among the classical bordetellae. Second, this isolate might be a descendant or relative of an ancestor of the classical bordetellae which later became pathogenic after acquisition of several virulence-associated factors, such as pertussis toxin, adenylate cyclase toxin, and dermonecrotic toxin. Third, this isolate may in fact represent a B. bronchiseptica or B. parapertussis strain that naturally survives and/or grows within an environmental reservoir. Although the classical bordetellae have not yet been isolated from outside a mammalian host, our results suggest that animal-pathogenic Bordetella species retain the ability to grow in soil as an environmental niche. This implies that B. bronchiseptica and other species might be found (at least transiently) in soil, for example at farms with suitable animal hosts such as cattle, pig, sheep and horse, or near dog kennels. Interestingly, even fastidious B. pertussis bacteria remained able to be cultured for up to 5 days when spread onto various hospital-setting surfaces such as fabrics, plastics, glass, and paper, and also in several infant foods (Ocklitz and Milleck, 1967). Fourth, B. sp. HF38 as well as other isolates from water and soil may be protected internally by a non-vertebrate host. For example, amoebae are known to host bacteria such as Legionella pneumophila (Molmeret et al., 2005), and amoeba-grown L. pneumophila exhibited radically increased resistance to harsh environmental conditions such as fluctuations in temperature, osmolarity, acidity, as well as to biocides that may facilitate bacterial survival and persistence in the environment (Barker et al., 1995; Abu Kwaik et al., 1997, 1998; Winiecka-Krusnell and Linder, 1999). Amoebae are ubiquitously found in most environments, and shared habitats between amoeba and Bordetella could be an important factor for the persistence of the bacteria. Indeed, our group has shown that the animal-adapted B. bronchiseptica is able to survive and multiply intracellularly in the trophozoites and sori of the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum before being disseminated with the amoeba spores to novel geographical locations (Bendor et al., in revision). Thus, in addition to our recent data demonstrating that B. bronchiseptica can circulate and efficiently transmit amongst mammals, these data demonstrate that this species can also grow and disseminate efficiently in association with amoebae. These independent but interconnected Bordetella lifecycles allow for disease propagation, transmission, and re-emergence in the absence of an infected animal host. Strains included in this study were identified as Bordetella spp. based on their 16S rRNA gene sequence. Currently, there are no data available regarding potential pathogenicity of these species. Whole genome sequencing will provide valuable insights into the evolution and ecology of environmental vs. animal-pathogenic bordetellae. Of special interest are environmental isolates closely related to animal pathogens, particularly isolate B. sp. HF38, and analysis of their genomes will reveal whether they are non-pathogenic relatives of known animal pathogens or if they in fact represent environmental reservoirs of B. bronchiseptica or B. parapertussis. Finally, the majority of environmental B. sp. were recovered from soil samples indicating that soil could be the most frequent natural habitat of bordetellae. Indeed, sequences identified from soil samples were found in 8 of 10 sequence clusters, including samples from compost in cluster X at the root of the tree (Figure 1). The sequence of branching events within the phylogenetic tree, the significantly higher sequence diversity in samples from soil and water than in those from animals, as well as the preserved ability of animal pathogens to grow in soil, suggest an environmental, likely soil-based, origin of the genus Bordetella. Thus, similar to bacteria of the closely related genus Achromobacter, which are of environmental origin but also contain opportunistic pathogens (Li et al., 2013), Bordetella appears to be a bacterium of environmental origin that adapted and became pathogenic via the acquisition of factors mediating specific interactions with animal hosts.

Author contributions

IHS, BL, and ETH conceived and designed the experiments. IHS and BL performed the experiments and analyzed the data. IHS, BL and ETH wrote the paper.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  52 in total

1.  Hydrogen sulfide degradation characteristics of Bordetella sp. Sulf-8 in a biotrickling filter.

Authors:  Grace M Nisola; Enkhdul Tuuguu; Danvir Mark D Farnazo; Mideok Han; Younghee Kim; Eulsaeng Cho; Wook-Jin Chung
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica.

Authors:  Julian Parkhill; Mohammed Sebaihia; Andrew Preston; Lee D Murphy; Nicholas Thomson; David E Harris; Matthew T G Holden; Carol M Churcher; Stephen D Bentley; Karen L Mungall; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Louise Temple; Keith James; Barbara Harris; Michael A Quail; Mark Achtman; Rebecca Atkin; Steven Baker; David Basham; Nathalie Bason; Inna Cherevach; Tracey Chillingworth; Matthew Collins; Anne Cronin; Paul Davis; Jonathan Doggett; Theresa Feltwell; Arlette Goble; Nancy Hamlin; Heidi Hauser; Simon Holroyd; Kay Jagels; Sampsa Leather; Sharon Moule; Halina Norberczak; Susan O'Neil; Doug Ormond; Claire Price; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Simon Rutter; Mandy Sanders; David Saunders; Katherine Seeger; Sarah Sharp; Mark Simmonds; Jason Skelton; Robert Squares; Steven Squares; Kim Stevens; Louise Unwin; Sally Whitehead; Bart G Barrell; Duncan J Maskell
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-10       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Oxidation of arsenite by two β-proteobacteria isolated from soil.

Authors:  Sachin P Bachate; Rashmi M Khapare; Kisan M Kodam
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  A simple chemically defined medium for the production of phase I Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  D W Stainer; M J Scholte
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1970-10

5.  Bordetella petrii sp. nov., isolated from an anaerobic bioreactor, and emended description of the genus Bordetella.

Authors:  F von Wintzingerode; A Schattke; R A Siddiqui; U Rösick; U B Göbel; R Gross
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Comparative genome characterization of Achromobacter members reveals potential genetic determinants facilitating the adaptation to a pathogenic lifestyle.

Authors:  Xiangyang Li; Yao Hu; Jing Gong; Linshuang Zhang; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Isolation and characterization of novel bisphenol-A--degrading bacteria from soils.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Matsumura; Chiemi Hosokawa; Miho Sasaki-Mori; Ayako Akahira; Kenji Fukunaga; Toshihiko Ikeuchi; Ko-Ichi Oshiman; Tetsuaki Tsuchido
Journal:  Biocontrol Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  Bordetella holmesii bacteremia: a newly recognized clinical entity among asplenic patients.

Authors:  Colin W Shepard; Maryam I Daneshvar; Robyn M Kaiser; David A Ashford; David Lonsway; Jean B Patel; Roger E Morey; Jean G Jordan; Robbin S Weyant; Marc Fischer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Comparative genomics of the classical Bordetella subspecies: the evolution and exchange of virulence-associated diversity amongst closely related pathogens.

Authors:  Jihye Park; Ying Zhang; Anne M Buboltz; Xuqing Zhang; Stephan C Schuster; Umesh Ahuja; Minghsun Liu; Jeff F Miller; Mohammed Sebaihia; Stephen D Bentley; Julian Parkhill; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Bordetella petrii clinical isolate.

Authors:  Norman K Fry; John Duncan; Henry Malnick; Marina Warner; Andrew J Smith; Margaret S Jackson; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  20 in total

1.  The extent of the temperature-induced membrane remodeling in two closely related Bordetella species reflects their adaptation to diverse environmental niches.

Authors:  Gabriela Seydlova; Jana Beranova; Ilona Bibova; Ana Dienstbier; Jakub Drzmisek; Jiri Masin; Radovan Fiser; Ivo Konopasek; Branislav Vecerek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Genotypic and phenotypic adaptation of pathogens: lesson from the genus Bordetella.

Authors:  Bodo Linz; Longhuan Ma; Israel Rivera; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.915

3.  Bordetella holmesii Contamination of Platelet Concentrates: Revisiting the Definition of a Positive Culture.

Authors:  Gilles Delage; Louis Thibault; Marc Cloutier; Marie-Ève Nolin; Hana Daoud; Annie Jacques; Marie Joëlle de Grandmont; Éric Ducas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Genomic, morphological, and biochemical analyses of a multi-metal resistant but multi-drug susceptible strain of Bordetella petrii from hospital soil.

Authors:  Urmi Halder; Raju Biswas; Ashutosh Kabiraj; Rajendar Deora; Moitri Let; Rajendra Kr Roy; Annapurna Chitikineni; Krishnendu Majhi; Shrabana Sarkar; Bhramar Dutta; Anubhab Laha; Arunava Datta; Dibyendu Khan; Rajeev K Varshney; Dipnarayan Saha; Saswati Chattopadhyay; Rajib Bandopadhyay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The Transcriptional Regulator BpsR Controls the Growth of Bordetella bronchiseptica by Repressing Genes Involved in Nicotinic Acid Degradation.

Authors:  Manita Guragain; Jamie Jennings-Gee; Natalia Cattelan; Mary Finger; Matt S Conover; Thomas Hollis; Rajendar Deora
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Development of macrolide resistance in Bordetella bronchiseptica is associated with the loss of virulence.

Authors:  Kalyan K Dewan; Amanda L Skarlupka; Israel Rivera; Laura E Cuff; Monica C Gestal; Dawn L Taylor-Mulneix; Shannon Wagner; Valerie E Ryman; Coralis Rodriguez; Illiassou Hamidou Soumana; Bruce R Levin; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Evolution of Bordetellae from Environmental Microbes to Human Respiratory Pathogens: Amoebae as a Missing Link.

Authors:  Dawn L Taylor-Mulneix; Illiassou Hamidou Soumana; Bodo Linz; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Ancient bacteria-amoeba relationships and pathogenic animal bacteria.

Authors:  Joan E Strassmann; Longfei Shu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Bordetella bronchiseptica exploits the complex life cycle of Dictyostelium discoideum as an amplifying transmission vector.

Authors:  Dawn L Taylor-Mulneix; Liron Bendor; Bodo Linz; Israel Rivera; Valerie E Ryman; Kalyan K Dewan; Shannon M Wagner; Emily F Wilson; Lindsay J Hilburger; Laura E Cuff; Christopher M West; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Did new transmission cycles in anthropogenic, dense, host populations encourage the emergence and speciation of pathogenic Bordetella?

Authors:  Kalyan K Dewan; Eric T Harvill
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.