| Literature DB >> 34827027 |
Jaya Kaushik1, Y V K Chaitanya1, Ashok Kumar1, Pushpendra Jakhar1, Rakesh Shetty1, Aanchal Singhal1, J K S Parihar2, Ankita Singh1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the various innovative surgical training techniques prevalent among ophthalmology residents in India during the COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; innovative training techniques; surgical training
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34827027 PMCID: PMC8837362 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1886_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1The geographic distribution of the responses obtained
Figure 2The extent to which the respondents’ academic training, thesis work, clinical exposure, and surgical training were affected
Figure 3The different types of surgical training methods utilized by the respondents
Figure 4Frequency of practicing innovative surgical training techniques
Details of surgical procedures practiced by the innovative techniques
| Surgical procedure | Number of residents | JR1 | JR2 | JR3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steps of cataract surgery | 130 (88.4%) | 38 (25.9%) | 38 (25.9%) | 54 (36.7%) |
| Incision/Tunnel | 108 (73.5%) | 34 (23.1%) | 33 (22.4%) | 41 (27.9%) |
| Capsulorrhexis | 91 (61.9%) | 22 (14.9%) | 25 (17%) | 44 (29.9%) |
| Lens delivery | 35 (23.8%) | 10 (6.8%) | 8 (5.4%) | 17 (11.6%) |
| Suturing | 92 (62.6%) | 26 (17.7%) | 29 (19.7%) | 37 (25.2%) |
| Loading of IOL | 35 (23.8%) | 8 (5.4%) | 8 (5.4%) | 19 (12.9%) |
| Steps of trabeculectomy | 24 (16.3%) | 5 (3.4%) | 7 (4.8%) | 12 (8.2%) |
| Conjunctival peritomy | 75 (51%) | 24 (16.3%) | 22 (14.9%) | 29 (19.7) |
| Scleral flap preparation | 56 (38.1%) | 11 (7.5%) | 17 (11.6%) | 28 (19%) |
| Surgical PI | 32 (21.8%) | 11 (7.5%) | 10 (6.8%) | 11 (7.5%) |
| Scleral flap suturing | 60 (40.8%) | 19 (12.9%) | 15 (10.2%) | 26 (17.7%) |
| Steps of open globe repair | 52 (35.4%) | 13 (8.8%) | 16 (10.9) | 23 (15.6%) |
| Conjunctival exploration | 58 (39.5%) | 16 (10.9%) | 17 (11.6%) | 25 (17%) |
| Limbal anatomy restoration | 34 (23.1%) | 10 (6.8%) | 8 (5.4%) | 16 (10.9%) |
| Excision of prolapsed iris | 36 (24.5%) | 8 (5.4%) | 10 (6.8%) | 18 (12.2%) |
| Primary closure of corneo-scleral laceration | 82 (55.8%) | 22 (14.9%) | 25 (17%) | 35 (23.8%) |
| AC reformation | 39 (26.5%) | 9 (6.1%) | 14 (9.5%) | 16 (10.9%) |
IOL: Intraocular lens, PI: Peripheral iridectomy, AC: Anterior chamber
Figure 5Responses on the ideal way of imparting surgical skill training