Literature DB >> 29785986

Effect of wet-laboratory training on resident-performed manual small-incision cataract surgery.

Parikshit Gogate1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29785986      PMCID: PMC5989500          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_702_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Manual small-incision cataract surgery is the most commonly taught cataract surgery in Indian ophthalmic residency training programs.[12] Pradeep et al. need to be congratulated for such a meticulous study on the effect of wet-laboratory training in this important field.[3] Residents in many training programs in India, and worldwide, do not get an opportunity to perform enough number of cataract surgeries, under supervision and independently, to groom them into confident and proficient surgeons.[124] Fewer opportunities to operate upon cataracts translate into poor proficiency and an inability to deal with the unexpected and poorer visual outcomes, setting up a downward spiral. Poorly trained residents get less opportunity postresidency for fellowships and senior residency and consultancy positions. Many remain locked in the vicious circle of their skill deficit. Pradeep et al. have shown that residents who had spent time in wet-laboratories had lesser complications and improved visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Their study demonstrates that incidence of posterior capsular rent, vitreous loss, and aphakia reduced, while immediate postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery improved! The difference was most marked in the 2nd-year residents who were more likely to operate independently than the 1st-year ones who performed surgery under closer supervision. The residents who performed initial steps on goat's eyes, under an operating microscope, improved their hand–eye co-ordination, got the feel of the tissue, and came to know what to do if things went awry (button holing or premature entry during tunnel construction and extension of capsulorhexis). However, they were not able to explain why microcystic edema was more in Group B, those who were trained in wet-laboratory first. Wet-laboratories can also be used for noncataract surgeries which are performed even less sparingly in residency programs, like for trabeculectomy and strabismus. A training program in the USA used commercially available bacon as an extraocular muscle substitute and cadaveric pig eyes for conjunctival and scleral tissue for teaching strabismus surgery.[5] Cigarette carton transparent covers and boiled tomato and potato peels have been used in India to teach capsulorhexis. Simulators are an excellent option for teaching phacoemulsification but are expensive and not easily available. A New York-based not-for-profit organization, HelpMeSee, has developed a simulator for tunnel making in manual small-incision cataract surgery. However, till now, such simulators are not readily available; wet-laboratories can be an excellent alternative in making cataract surgery training easier and safer. There is a need to mandate the establishment and use of wet-laboratory facility in ophthalmology residency training in India, if the country is to tackle its enormous backlog of cataract blindness by improving surgical outcomes.
  5 in total

1.  A novel method for teaching key steps of strabismus surgery in the wet lab.

Authors:  Cassandra A White; James A Wrzosek; David A Chesnutt; Laura B Enyedi; Michelle T Cabrera
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Residency evaluation and adherence design study: Young ophthalmologists' perception of their residency programs - Clinical and surgical skills.

Authors:  Parikshit Gogate; Partha Biswas; Sundaram Natarajan; Dandapani Ramamurthy; Debashish Bhattacharya; Karl Golnik; Barun Kumar Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Effect of wet-laboratory training on resident performed manual small-incision cataract surgery.

Authors:  Soumya Ramani; Thanuja Gopal Pradeep; Divya D Sundaresh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Which is the best method to learn ophthalmology? Resident doctors' perspective of ophthalmology training.

Authors:  Parikshit Gogate; Madan Deshpande; Sheetal Dharmadhikari
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  A survey of perceived training differences between ophthalmology residents in Hong Kong and China.

Authors:  Alvin L Young; Vishal Jhanji; Yuanbo Liang; Nathan Congdon; Simon Chow; Fenghua Wang; Xiujuan Zhang; Xiaofei Man; Mingming Yang; Zhong Lin; Hunter G L Yuen; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors for vitreous loss in residents performing manual small-incision cataract surgery.

Authors:  Rajesh Subhash Joshi; Ashok Hukumchand Madan; Preeti Dashrath Wadekar; Nivedita Patil; Sonali Tamboli; Tanmay Surwade; Namrata Bansode
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Ophthalmology residency trainers' perspective on standardization of residency training in India.

Authors:  Parikshit Madhav Gogate; Partha Biswas; Santosh G Honavar; Namrata Sharma; Rajesh Sinha; Mahipal Singh Sachdev; Lalit Verma; Barun Kumar Nayak; Sundaram Natarajan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Prevalence and effectiveness of innovative techniques in ophthalmic surgical training during COVID-19 pandemic in India.

Authors:  Jaya Kaushik; Y V K Chaitanya; Ashok Kumar; Pushpendra Jakhar; Rakesh Shetty; Aanchal Singhal; J K S Parihar; Ankita Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  The impact of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmology training programs in India - Outcomes of a survey.

Authors:  Deepak Mishra; Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Rashmin Anilkumar Gandhi; Parikshit J Gogate; Satanshu Mathur; Prashant Bhushan; Tanmay Srivastav; Hemendra Singh; Bibhuti P Sinha; Mahendra Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.