| Literature DB >> 34825871 |
Annie G Bryant1, Mary K Manhard2, David H Salat2, Bruce R Rosen2, Bradley T Hyman1, Keith A Johnson1, Susie Huang2, Rachel E Bennett1, Yi-Fen Yen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduced cerebrovascular function and accumulation of tau pathology are key components of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent multimodal neuroimaging studies show a correlation between cortical tau accumulation and reduced cerebral perfusion. However, animal models predict that tau exerts capillary-level changes that may not be fully captured by standard imaging protocols.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; cerebrovascular function.; dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging; microvascular perfusion; multimodal neuroimaging; positron emission tomography; tau pathology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34825871 PMCID: PMC8822690 DOI: 10.2174/1567205018666211126113904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res ISSN: 1567-2050 Impact factor: 3.498
Fig. (1)Tau SUVR overlaid on the group-average template structural MRI slices at coronal levels that demonstrate tracer distribution in each case. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Fig. (2)Representative slices showing FLAIR, tau-PET SUVR, rCBF, rCTH, and rOEF parametric maps for each subject. All volumes are presented in individual subject space. White ovals highlight regions with high tau-PET signal and/or noteworthy SE-DSC microvascular patterns. a.u. = arbitrary units. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
Demographic and cognitive information for the subjects in this case series study. Amyloid-β positivity is defined as a partial volume corrected FLR (frontal, lateral temporal, and retrosplenial cortex) distribution volume ratio (DVR) of 1.3 or greater. Summary statistics in the final row are presented as mean (standard deviation).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub01 | AD | 74 | F | 21 | 6 | 1 | 2.9 | e3/e4 | + |
| Sub02 | MCI | 82 | M | 26 | 2 | 0.5 | 2.9 | NA | + |
| Sub03 | MCI | 62 | F | 22 | 2 | 0.5 | 3.8 | e4/e4 | + |
| Sub04 | MCI | 70 | M | 24 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | NA | + |
| Sub05 | MCI | 78 | M | 29 | 2 | 0.5 | 1.7 | e3/e4 | + |
| Sub06 | MCI | 79 | M | 22 | 3 | 0.5 | 3.2 | e3/e3 | - |
| Sub07 | MCI | 75 | F | 30 | 1 | 0.5 | 4.1 | e3/e3 | - |
| n=7 | 6 MCI, 1 AD | 74.3 (6.7) | 4M, 3F | 24.9 (3.6) | 2.6 (1.6) | 6 CDR0.5, 1 CDR1 | 2.7 (1.2) | 3 e4+, 2 e4-, 2 NA | 5+, 2- |
Summary statistics from functional data projected onto the cortical surface in individual subject space. Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation) across all cortical surface vertices per subject. In the bottom row, results from Pearson’s correlation test are shown for each column compared with Tau SUVR across the seven subjects. a.u. = arbitrary units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub01 | 2.19 (0.59) | 0.82 (0.33) | 0.67 (0.35) | 0.62 (0.35) | 1.38 (0.41) |
| Sub02 | 2.17 (0.57) | 0.79 (0.33) | 0.71 (0.43) | 0.81 (0.38) | 1.13 (0.28) |
| Sub03 | 2.26 (0.49) | 0.74 (0.43) | 0.82 (0.61) | 0.67 (0.22) | 1.43 (0.40) |
| Sub04 | 2.38 (0.48) | 0.71 (0.27) | 0.80 (0.66) | 0.64 (0.20) | 1.24 (0.25) |
| Sub05 | 2.25 (0.53) | 0.61 (0.23) | 0.69 (0.57) | 0.78 (0.33) | 1.14 (0.26) |
| Sub06 | 2.29 (0.47) | 0.91 (0.34) | 0.82 (0.53) | 0.78 (0.30) | 1.10 (0.20) |
| Sub07 | 2.38 (0.56) | 0.88 (0.37) | 0.77 (0.65) | 0.70 (0.22) | 1.15 (0.20) |
| Correlation with Tau SUVR | r = -0.188 | r = -0.173 | r = 0.075 | r = -0.790 | - |