| Literature DB >> 34825011 |
Sima Modiri1,2, Rouha Kasra Kermanshahi3, Mohammad Reza Soudi3, Navid Dad2, Mojgan Ebadi2, Hossein Shahbani Zahiri2, Kambiz Akbari Noghabi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are a major threat to global health. Older antibiotics have become more or less ineffective as a result of widespread microbial resistance and an urgent need has emerged for the development of new antimicrobial strategies. Acidocin 4356 is a novel antimicrobial bacteriocin peptide produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 and capable of confronting the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 infection challenges. According to our previous studies, the production of Acidocin 4356 is in parallel with cellular biomass production.Entities:
Keywords: Acidocin 4356; Antimicrobial peptide (AMP); Batch fermentation; Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356; Plackett-Burman (PB) design; Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections; Response surface methodology (RSM) design
Year: 2021 PMID: 34825011 PMCID: PMC8590721 DOI: 10.30498/ijb.2021.218725.2686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Biotechnol ISSN: 1728-3043 Impact factor: 1.671
Plackett–Burman design of variables in actual levels and growth rate as response.
| Std | Run | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.5 | 0.156 ± 0.040 | |
| 1 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 0.1 | 180 | 0.2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7.5 | 0.046 ± 0.033 | |
| 12 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 37 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0 | 2 | 7.5 | 0.394 ± 0.056 | |
| 5 | 4 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 37 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7.5 | 0.447 ± 0.046 | |
| 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 37 | 0.1 | 180 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 0.395 ± 0.016 | |
| 22 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 32 | 0.2 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.062 ± 0.055 | |
| 18 | 7 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 0.1 | 180 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 2 | 2 | 4.5 | 0.209 ± 0.037 | |
| 23 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 32 | 0.2 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.325 ± 0.035 | |
| 17 | 9 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 27 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 2 | 0 | 4.5 | 0.058 ± 0.046 | |
| 13 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 37 | 0.3 | 180 | 0 | 0.04 | 2 | 0 | 7.5 | 0.001 ± 0.075 | |
| 11 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 37 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4.5 | 0.269 ± 0.042 | |
| 6 | 12 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 27 | 0.3 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.5 | 0.029 ± 0.068 | |
| 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 37 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 2 | 4.5 | 0.3 ± 0.071 | |
| 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 37 | 0.3 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4.5 | 0.438 ± 0.031 | |
| 2 | 15 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 27 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 2 | 7.5 | 0.003 ± 0.032 | |
| 21 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 32 | 0.2 | 90 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 1 | 1 | 6 | -0.012 ± 0.047 | |
| 19 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 2 | 2 | 7.5 | 0.029 ± 0.018 | |
| 3 | 18 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 27 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7.5 | 0.038 ± 0.046 | |
| 7 | 19 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 37 | 0.1 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 0.063 ± 0.043 | |
| 10 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 20 | 27 | 0.1 | 180 | 0 | 0.04 | 2 | 0 | 4.5 | 0.028 ± 0.036 | |
| 20 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.5 | 0.014 ± 0.028 | |
| 9 | 22 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 27 | 0.3 | 180 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 4.5 | 0.02 ± 0.016 | |
| 15 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 27 | 0.3 | 180 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7.5 | 0.058 ± 0.043 |
A
: Glucose (g/L), B: Yeast extract (g/L), C: di- Potassium hydrogen phosphate (g/L), D: Peptone from casein (g/L), E: Yeast extract (from yeasts in Vinasse) (ml/L), F: Temperature (°C), G: Inoculum size (OD600), H: Aeration (rpm), I: Magnesium sulfate (g/L), J: Manganese sulfate (g/L), K: Ammonium sulfate (g/L), L: Tween 80 (g/L), M: pH, and R: Response (OD600).
Mean ± standard deviation.
ANOVA analysis of Plackett–Burman design.
| Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 14 | 0.487366 | 0.034812 | 3.52 | 0.040 |
| Linear | 13 | 0.485768 | 0.037367 | 3.78 | 0.033 |
| A | 1 | 0.000832 | 0.000832 | 0.08 | 0.779 |
| B | 1 | 0.092616 | 0.092616 | 9.37 | 0.016 |
| C | 1 | 0.005746 | 0.005746 | 0.58 | 0.468 |
| D | 1 | 0.063506 | 0.063506 | 6.42 | 0.035 |
| E | 1 | 0.013468 | 0.013468 | 1.36 | 0.277 |
| F | 1 | 0.275890 | 0.275890 | 27.91 | 0.001 |
| G | 1 | 0.003511 | 0.003511 | 0.36 | 0.568 |
| H | 1 | 0.008862 | 0.008862 | 0.90 | 0.371 |
| I | 1 | 0.004234 | 0.004234 | 0.43 | 0.531 |
| J | 1 | 0.000732 | 0.000732 | 0.07 | 0.792 |
| K | 1 | 0.000858 | 0.000858 | 0.09 | 0.776 |
| L | 1 | 0.015401 | 0.015401 | 1.56 | 0.247 |
| M | 1 | 0.000110 | 0.000110 | 0.01 | 0.918 |
| Curvature | 1 | 0.001598 | 0.001598 | 0.16 | 0.698 |
| Error | 8 | 0.079090 | 0.009886 | ||
| Lack-of-Fit | 6 | 0.016352 | 0.002725 | 0.09 | 0.991 |
| Pure Error | 2 | 0.062738 | 0.031369 | ||
| Total | 22 | 0.566456 |
Significant values with P-Value < 0.05.
Lack of fit is insignificant (P- value > 0.05)
Figure 1Main effects plot (fitted means) of different variables tested in the Plackett–Burman experiment. *A: Glucose (g.L-1), B: yeast extract (g.L-1), C: di- Potassium hydrogen phosphate (g.L-1), D: Peptone from casein (g.L-1), E: Yeast extract (from yeasts in Vinasse) (ml.L-1), F: Temperature (°C), G: Inoculum size (OD600), H: Aeration (rpm), I: Magnesium sulfate (g.L-1), J: Manganese sulfate (g.L-1), K: Ammonium sulfate (g.L-1), L: Tween 80 (g.L-1), M: pH, and R: Response (OD600).
Central composite design and growth determination using optical density (OD600) as response variable.
| StdRun | Factor A : Peptone | Factor B : Yeast | Factor C : Temperature | Response | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 27 | 0.361 ± 0.051 |
| 2 | 5 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 27 | 0.448 ± 0.038 |
| 3 | 16 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 27 | 0.381 ± 0.043 |
| 4 | 12 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 27 | 0.44 ± 0.066 |
| 5 | 10 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 37 | 0.59 ± 0.055 |
| 6 | 19 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 37 | 0.727 ± 0.048 |
| 7 | 18 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 37 | 0.75 ± 0.075 |
| 8 | 3 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 37 | 0.87 ± 0.064 |
| 9 | 11 | 0.0977868 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.597 ± 0.065 |
| 10 | 4 | 8.00221 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.747 ± 0.058 |
| 11 | 20 | 4.05 | 0.115938 | 32 | 0.539 ± 0.044 |
| 12 | 8 | 4.05 | 3.98406 | 32 | 0.693 ± 0.034 |
| 13 | 1 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 23.591 | 0.226 ± 0.012 |
| 14 | 17 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 40.409 | 0.754 ± 0.043 |
| 15 | 6 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.647 ± 0.016 |
| 16 | 15 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.661 ± 0.022 |
| 17 | 7 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.672 ± 0.024 |
| 18 | 14 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.665 ± 0.047 |
| 19 | 2 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.647 ± 0.043 |
| 20 | 13 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 32 | 0.647 ± 0.032 |
Mean ± standard deviation.
ANOVA of the quadratic model for the growth of L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 during fermentation in flask.
| Source | Sum of Squares | dfMean Square | F-value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.4805 | 9 | 0.0534 | 263.45 | < 0.0001 |
| A-Pepton0.0314 | 1 | 0.0314 | 155.13 | < 0.0001 | |
| B-Yeast | 0.0241 | 1 | 0.0241 | 119.04 | < 0.0001 |
| C-Temperature | 0.3528 | 1 | 0.3528 | 1740.69 | < 0.0001 |
| AB | 0.0003 | 1 | 0.0003 | 1.25 | 0.2899 |
| AC | 0.0015 | 1 | 0.0015 | 7.60 | 0.0202 |
| BC | 0.0106 | 1 | 0.0106 | 52.23 | < 0.0001 |
| A² | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.2052 | 0.6603 |
| B² | 0.0047 | 1 | 0.0047 | 23.30 | 0.0007 |
| C² | 0.0566 | 1 | 0.0566 | 279.08 | < 0.0001 |
| Residual | 0.0020 | 10 | 0.0002 | - | - |
| Lack of Fit | 0.0014 | 5 | 0.0003 | 2.36 | 0.1841 |
| Pure Error | 0.0006 | 5 | 0.0001 | - | - |
| Cor Total | 0.4826 | 19 | - | - | - |
Significant values with P-Value < 0.05.
Lack of fit is insignificant (P- value > 0.05).
Figure 2Three-dimensional response surface (left) and contour plots (right) for the effect of culture condition on the growth of L. acidophilus ATCC 4356.A) Peptone vs Yeast, B) Peptone vs Temperature, C) Yeast vs Temperature.
Figure 3Comparison of bacterial growth A) and bacteriocin production B) of optimized and MRS broth media.
Figure 4Batch fermentation of L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 in 3-L fermenter under optimal condition. A) Evaluation of growth without pH control, B) Kinetics of growth under the controlled pH in two different Runs, and C) Comparison of bacteriocin production.