Literature DB >> 34824716

Classification-Based Management of Stiff/Ankylosed Knees.

Mrinal Sharma1, Saurabh Sharma1, Akshay Raj Upadhyaya1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Stiff knees are defined as those with an arc of motion < 50°. They pose a considerable surgical challenge to the operating surgeon. Based on our experience to deal with these complex cases, we have developed a working classification that outlines a flowchart to manage the stiff/ankylosed knees.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective study conducted in our department. Out of 570 TKA performed in last 5 years, 57 had stiffness and four had bony ankyloses (total 61 knees). Patients were classified based on the fibrous or bony ankylosis and preoperative ROM.
RESULTS: Patients were followed for an average 2.4 years (1.8-5.5 years). KSS pain scores improved from an av. 32 preop (18-64) to av. 76 postoperatively (61-90). The KSS function scores improved from a preoperative value of 36 (16-56) to an av. 78 (52-90) postoperatively. ROM improved from an average of 35.6° (0°-44°) preoperatively to an average of 95.6° (ROM 73°-118°) postoperatively. Extension lag was an av. 8° (3°-12°) and was seen in 13 patients postoperatively. Residual fixed flexion deformity was an av. 7° (3°-14°) and seen in 17 patients. The stiff knees (type 1 and type 2) fared better than ankylosed knees (type 3) in all aspects. Complication rate was high (24%) in our series.
CONCLUSION: Our classification of stiff/ankylosed knees guides the surgeon to decide upon which approach to take, which implants to keep handy and has a predictive and prognostic value. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arc of motion; Bony ankylosis; Classification; Hinged implants; Stiff knees; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34824716      PMCID: PMC8586129          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00457-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  25 in total

1.  Conversion of a fused knee with use of a posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; S-H Oh; J-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Does TKA improve functional outcome and range of motion in patients with stiff knees?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Total knee replacement for patients with ankylosed knees.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; J-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-10

4.  Results of total knee arthroplasty following takedown of formal knee fusion.

Authors:  H U Cameron; C Hu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Total knee arthroplasty in the presence of severe flexion contracture: a report of 37 cases.

Authors:  H Lu; C S Mow; J Lin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Total knee arthroplasty in a previously ankylosed or arthrodesed knee.

Authors:  R J Naranja; P A Lotke; M W Pagnano; A D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Conversion from knee arthrodesis to arthroplasty: systematic review.

Authors:  Willem Alexander Kernkamp; Wiebe Christiaan Verra; Bart Godefridus Pijls; Jan Wilhelmus Schoones; Henrica Maria Jannetta van der Linden; Rob Gerardus Henricus Hubertus Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Total knee arthroplasty of the stiff knee: three hundred and four cases.

Authors:  Caroline Debette; Sébastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Timothy Lording; Vincent Villa; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Stiffness and ankylosis in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Kelly; Henry D Clarke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.