Literature DB >> 18712582

Does TKA improve functional outcome and range of motion in patients with stiff knees?

Young-Hoo Kim1, Jun-Shik Kim.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The main goals of TKA are pain relief and improvement of function and range of motion (ROM). To ascertain whether TKA in patients with stiff knees would relieve pain and improve functional outcome and ROM, we asked four questions: whether (1) Knee Society and WOMAC scores would improve after TKA; (2) poor preoperative ROM would improve after TKA; (3) the revision rate of TKA in stiff knees would be high; and (4) complication rates would be high in these patients after TKA. We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients (86 knees) with stiff knees (mean age, 56.8 years) who underwent TKAs with a condylar constrained or a posterior stabilized prosthesis. The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 9.1 years; range, 5-12 years). The mean preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and Knee Society knee and functional scores were 42, 11, and 42 points, respectively, and postoperatively they were 84, 90, and 84 points, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative total WOMAC scores were 73 and 34 points, respectively. One knee (1.2%) had aseptic loosening of the tibial component and 12 knees (14%) had complications. Despite a relatively high rate of complications, most patients had substantial improvement in function. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712582      PMCID: PMC2664409          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0445-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  Range of motion after arthroplasty for the stiff osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  D D M Spicer; J I Curry; D L Pomeroy; W E Badenhausen; L A Schaper; K E Suthers; M W Smith
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  2002

2.  Conversion of a fused knee with use of a posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; S-H Oh; J-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components.

Authors:  R W Nutton; M L van der Linden; P J Rowe; P Gaston; F A Wade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-01

4.  A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses.

Authors:  J N Insall; C S Ranawat; P Aglietti; J Shine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Total prosthetic replacement of ankylosed knees.

Authors:  G W Bradley; M A Freeman; B E Albrektsson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Range of motion following total knee arthroplasty in ankylosed joints.

Authors:  J O Mullen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion.

Authors:  James P McAuley; Michael F Harrer; Deborah Ammeen; Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total knee arthroplasty after spontaneous osseous ankylosis and takedown of formal knee fusion.

Authors:  Y H Kim; J S Kim; S H Cho
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  7 in total

1.  Total knee arthroplasty in stiff knee compared with flexible knees.

Authors:  M Fosco; M Filanti; L Amendola; L M Savarino; D Tigani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-03-09

2.  Classification-Based Management of Stiff/Ankylosed Knees.

Authors:  Mrinal Sharma; Saurabh Sharma; Akshay Raj Upadhyaya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  A comparative study of total knee arthroplasty outcome for stiff knee with or without sequential antirheumatic drug treatment.

Authors:  Ji-Ying Chen; Xiang Li; Cheng-Qi Jia; Xiao-Rui Guan; Zhi-Lai Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Total knee arthroplasty of the stiff knee: three hundred and four cases.

Authors:  Caroline Debette; Sébastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Timothy Lording; Vincent Villa; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Total knee arthroplasty for valgus osteoarthritis: the results of a standardized soft-tissue release technique.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Lisa Renner; Danik Arana Narbarte; Claus Egidy; Martin Faschingbauer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical outcome, functional outcome and patient satisfaction after cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for stiff arthritic knee - A short term outcome study.

Authors:  Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa; Om Prakash Sharma; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Prasanth Jayakumari Sudevan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Senthil Nathan Sambandam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-10

7.  Does the severity or cause of preoperative stiffness affect the clinical results and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Seung Ah Lee; Seung-Baik Kang; Chong Bum Chang; Moon Jong Chang; Young Jun Kim; Min Kyu Song; Jin Hwa Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.