Literature DB >> 34824163

Economic evaluation of quality improvement interventions to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the hospital setting: a systematic review.

Sara G McCleskey1,2, Lili Shek3, Jonathan Grein3, Hiroshi Gotanda3, Laura Anderson3,4, Paul G Shekelle5,6, Emmett Keeler6, Sally Morton7, Teryl K Nuckols3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitals have implemented diverse quality improvement (QI) interventions to reduce rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). The economic value of these QI interventions is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review economic evaluations of QI interventions designed to prevent CAUTI in acute care hospitals.
METHODS: A search of Ovid MEDLINE, Econlit, Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, New York Academy of Medicine's Grey Literature Report, WorldCat, IDWeek conference abstracts and prior systematic reviews was conducted from January 2000 to October 2020.We included English-language studies of any design that evaluated organisational or structural changes to prevent CAUTI in acute care hospitals, and reported programme and infection-related costs.Dual reviewers assessed study design, effectiveness, costs and study quality. For each eligible study, we performed a cost-consequences analysis from the hospital perspective, estimating the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and incremental net cost/savings per hospital over 3 years. Unadjusted weighted regression analyses tested predictors of these measures, weighted by catheter days per study.
RESULTS: Fifteen unique economic evaluations were eligible, encompassing 74 hospitals. Across 12 studies amenable to standardisation, QI interventions were associated with a 43% decline in infections (mean IRR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.70) and wide ranges of net costs (mean US$52 000, 95% CI -$288 000 to $392 000), relative to usual care.
CONCLUSIONS: QI interventions were associated with large declines in infection rates and net costs to hospitals that varied greatly but that, on average, were not significantly different from zero over 3 years. Future research should examine specific practices associated with cost-savings and clinical effectiveness, and examine whether or not more comprehensive interventions offer hospitals and patients the best value. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; nosocomial infections; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34824163      PMCID: PMC9134991          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.418


  40 in total

1.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Transferability of economic evaluations: approaches and factors to consider when using results from one geographic area for another.

Authors:  Ron Goeree; Natasha Burke; Daria O'Reilly; Andrea Manca; Gord Blackhouse; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 3.  Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system.

Authors:  Eyal Zimlichman; Daniel Henderson; Orly Tamir; Calvin Franz; Peter Song; Cyrus K Yamin; Carol Keohane; Charles R Denham; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013 Dec 9-23       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Authors:  Julie Glanville; David Kaunelis; Shaila Mensinkai
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.

Authors:  Evelyn Lo; Lindsay E Nicolle; Susan E Coffin; Carolyn Gould; Lisa L Maragakis; Jennifer Meddings; David A Pegues; Ann Marie Pettis; Sanjay Saint; Deborah S Yokoe
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  Silver alloy vs. uncoated urinary catheters: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle Beattie; Julie Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 7.  Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.

Authors:  Thomas B L Lam; Muhammad Imran Omar; Euan Fisher; Katie Gillies; Sara MacLennan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-23

8.  Catheter-associated urinary tract infection and the Medicare rule changes.

Authors:  Sanjay Saint; Jennifer A Meddings; David Calfee; Christine P Kowalski; Sarah L Krein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer Meddings; Mary A M Rogers; Sarah L Krein; Mohamad G Fakih; Russell N Olmsted; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Paul G Shekelle; Jodi L Liu; Margie Sherwood Danz; Robbie Foy; Yee-Wei Lim; Aneesa Motala; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.