| Literature DB >> 34821678 |
Yangguang Zhu1,2, Qichen Tian3, Xiufen Li1, Lidong Wu4, Aimin Yu5, Guosong Lai6, Li Fu7, Qiuping Wei8, Dan Dai2,9, Nan Jiang2,9, He Li2,9, Chen Ye2,9, Cheng-Te Lin2,9.
Abstract
Considering the vital physiological functions of dopamine (DA) and uric acid (UA) and their coexistence in the biological matrix, the development of biosensing techniques for their simultaneous and sensitive detection is highly desirable for diagnostic and analytical applications. Therefore, Ti3C2Tx/rGO heterostructure with a double-deck layer was fabricated through electrochemical reduction. The rGO was modified on a porous Ti3C2Tx electrode as the biosensor for the detection of DA and UA simultaneously. Debye length was regulated by the alteration of rGO mass on the surface of the Ti3C2Tx electrode. Debye length decreased with respect to the rGO electrode modified with further rGO mass, indicating that fewer DA molecules were capable of surpassing the equilibrium double layer and reaching the surface of rGO to achieve the voltammetric response of DA. Thus, the proposed Ti3C2Tx/rGO sensor presented an excellent performance in detecting DA and UA with a wide linear range of 0.1-100 μM and 1-1000 μM and a low detection limit of 9.5 nM and 0.3 μM, respectively. Additionally, the proposed Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode displayed good repeatability, selectivity, and proved to be available for real sample analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Ti3C2Tx; dopamine; double deck; reduced graphene oxide; uric acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34821678 PMCID: PMC8615994 DOI: 10.3390/bios11110462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1(a) Schematic diagram of electrochemical detection of DA and UA based on Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode. (b) The proposed reaction scheme of redox reaction of DA and UA during electrochemical detection, respectively.
Figure 2SEM images of Ti3C2Tx electrode (a) and Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode (c). (b,d) Regional enlarged view of (a,c) and the EDS mapping of element distribution of C, Ti, F, O, respectively. (e) Raman spectra of Ti3C2Tx, rGO, and Ti3C2Tx/rGO nanocomposite. (f) XPS survey spectra of Ti3C2Tx/rGO, and Ti 2p spectra (g), C 1s spectra (h), O 1s spectra (i) spectra, respectively.
Figure 3(a) CV of Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode with and without 10 μM DA and 30 μM UA in PBS. (b) DPV curves of various modified electrodes with 10 μM DA in PBS. (c) The corresponding current value of (b). (d) Impedance plots of various modified electrodes with 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−. (e) Performance comparison of DPV curves on various materials modified Ti3C2Tx electrode with 10 μM DA in PBS. (f) The corresponding current value of (e). (g) Schematic diagram of DA adsorption in Ti3C2Tx and rGO dispersion. (h) DPV curves of DA adsorption performance.
Figure 4(a) DPV curves of Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode with various masses of rGO to the same of Ti3C2Tx with 100 nM DA in PBS; the inset graphic depicts an enlarged view in the potential range between 0.0–0.3 V. (b) DPV of Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode with various masses of Ti3C2Tx to the same of rGO with 10 μM DA in PBS. (c) the corresponding current value of (b). (d,e) CV and DPV of rGO electrode in PBS with various amounts of rGO, respectively. (f,g) Schematic diagram of EDL model to interpret DA detection mechanism via Debye length regulation. (h) DPV of 10 μM DA on Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode with pH. (i) Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode in 10 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− and 0.1 M KCl electrolyte solution at scan rates (v) from 20 to 260 mV s−1. (j) Linear plots of Ipa/Ipc vs. v.
Figure 5(a,b) DPV curves of Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode with various concentrations of DA and UA; the inset graphic depicts an enlarged view in the potential range between 0.0–0.3 V and 0.1–0.4 V, respectively. (c) The corresponding peak current versus DA and UA concentration. (d) The performance comparisons. (e,f) The repeatability and reproducibility of Ti3C2Tx/rGO electrode. (g,h) Good anti-interference of our electrodes. (i) Serum sample analysis.
Performance comparison of graphene-based materials modified electrodes for simultaneous detection of DA and UA.
| Modified Electrodes | Measurements | Linear Range (μM) | LOD (μM) | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DA | UA | DA | UA | |||
| rGO | DPV | 0.5–60 | 0.5–60 | 0.5 | 0.5 | [ |
| Graphene | Amperometric | 5.0–710 | 6.0–1330 | 2.0 | 4.8 | [ |
| Graphene | DPV | 0.5–2000 | 0.8–2500 | 0.12 | 0.2 | [ |
| Graphene aerogel | DPV | 0.65–75 | 0.4–50 | 0.22 | 0.12 | [ |
| CNTs/GO | DPV | 5.0–500 | 3.0–60 | 1.5 | 1.0 | [ |
| Chitosan/Graphene | DPV | 1.0–24 | 2.0–45 | 1.0 | 2.0 | [ |
| Au/rGO | DPV | 6.8–41 | 8.8–53 | 1.4 | 1.8 | [ |
| Au/Pt/GO/rGO | DPV | 0.07–49,800 | 0.13–82,800 | 0.02 | 0.04 | [ |
| Pt NPs/Graphene | DPV | 0.03–8.13 | 0.05–11.9 | 0.03 | 0.05 | [ |
| Ag/rGO | DPV | 10–70 | 10–130 | 1.0 | 1.0 | [ |
| Pd/Pt/rGO | DPV | 4–200 | 4–400 | 0.04 | 0.1 | [ |
| Mn3O4/rGO | SWV a | 1–600 | 1–600 | 1.42 | 0.76 | [ |
| Hemin/GO | DPV | 0.5–40 | 0.5–50 | 0.17 | 0.17 | [ |
| TiN/rGO | DPV | 5–175 | 30–215 | 0.16 | 0.35 | [ |
| N-doped rGO | DPV | 1–60 | 1–30 | 0.1 | 0.2 | [ |
| Ti3C2Tx/rGO | DPV | 0.1–100 | 1–1000 | 0.0095 | 0.3 | This work |
a SWV: Square wave voltammetry.