| Literature DB >> 34819813 |
Fatin Nabihah Jais1, Mohd Zulfaezal Che Azemin1, Mohd Radzi Hilmi1, Mohd Izzuddin Mohd Tamrin2, Khairidzan Mohd Kamal3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Early detection of visual symptoms in pterygium patients is crucial as the progression of the disease can cause visual disruption and contribute to visual impairment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and corneal astigmatism influence the degree of visual impairment due to direct invasion of fibrovascular tissue into the cornea. However, there were different characteristics of pterygium used to evaluate the severity of visual impairment, including fleshiness, size, length, and redness. The innovation of machine learning technology in visual science may contribute to developing a highly accurate predictive analytics model of BCVA outcomes in postsurgery pterygium patients. AIM: To produce an accurate model of BCVA changes of postpterygium surgery according to its morphological characteristics by using the machine learning technique. Methodology. A retrospective of the secondary dataset of 93 samples of pterygium patients with different pterygium attributes was used and imported into four different machine learning algorithms in RapidMiner software to predict the improvement of BCVA after pterygium surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34819813 PMCID: PMC8608506 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6211006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Flowchart of supervised machine learning with 10-fold cross-validation.
Figure 2Decision tree model.
Figure 3Support vector machine (SVM) model.
Logistic regression model.
| Attribute | Coefficient | Standard coefficient | Standard error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald | 456.434 | 371.630 | 87.931 | 5.191 | ≤0.001 |
| Redness | 49.445 | 27.240 | 23.664 | 2.089 | 0.037 |
| Thickness | −1343.404 | −149.799 | 448.471 | −2.996 | 0.003 |
| Length | 124.609 | 217.007 | 29.668 | 4.200 | ≤0.001 |
| Total area | 0.012 | 13.328 | 0.011 | 1.099 | 0.272 |
| Dry weight | −0.436 | −32.601 | 0.264 | −1.651 | 0.099 |
| Intercept | −420.476 | 350.923 | 133.025 | −3.161 | 0.002 |
Naïve Bayes model.
| Attribute | Parameter | No | Yes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total area | Mean | 1392.000 | 1999.552 |
| Standard deviation | 778.824 | 1189.886 | |
| Donald | Mean | 1.000 | 2.382 |
| Standard deviation | 0.001 | 0.624 | |
| Dry weight | Mean | 130.717 | 211.152 |
| Standard deviation | 48.460 | 71.205 | |
| Length | Mean | 2.314 | 3.887 |
| Standard deviation | 0.836 | 1.800 | |
| Redness | Mean | 1.648 | 2.130 |
| Standard deviation | 0.539 | 0.499 | |
| Thickness | Mean | 0.372 | 0.491 |
| Standard deviation | 0.065 | 0.108 |
Performance of classification models by cross-validation.
| Accuracy (%) | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Precision (%) | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Support vector machine (SVM) | 94.44 ± 5.86 | 100.00 | 92.14 ± 8.33 | 100.00 | 0.983 ± 0.053 |
| Decision tree | 95.56 ± 5.74 | 91.67 ± 18.00 | 96.67 ± 7.03 | 97.32 ± 5.66 | 0.550 ± 0.158 |
| Naïve Bayes | 94.44 ± 7.86 | 96.67 ± 10.54 | 93.57 ± 8.33 | 98.33 ± 5.27 | 0.967 ± 0.070 |
| Logistic regression | 91.22 ± 8.74 | 83.33 ± 32.39 | 93.57 ± 8.33 | 94.86 ± 8.59 | 0.961 ± 0.123 |
| Ensemble vote | 95.56 ± 5.74 | 100.00 | 93.57 ± 8.33 | 100.00 | 0.792 ± 0.252 |
| Ensemble AdaBoost-SVM | 94.44 ± 10.8 | 93.33 ± 21.08 | 95.24 ± 7.69 | 97.14 ± 9.04 | 0.986 ± 0.044 |
| Ensemble bagging-SVM | 94.44 ± 5.86 | 100.00 | 92.14 ± 8.33 | 100.00 | 0.983 ± 0.053 |