BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common disorder of the ocular surface. It causes vision impairment -usually irregular type astigmatism- through different mechanisms. In addition, it is believed that surgical excision of the pterygium improves visual problems. The appropriate method to investigate irregular astigmatism is using wavefront analysis. This study was aimed to evaluate wavefront analysis pre and post pterygium surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed on 32 patients who underwent surgical excision of pterygium in January 2012. Data were recorded and compared after pre and postoperative comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations including uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, Orbscan, wavefront analysis and autorefraction to figure out the effects of surgery on different parameters. RESULTS: Comparison of pre and postoperative parameters showed that surgical treatment of the pterygium improves numerous parameters significantly including uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, spherical and cylinder refractive error, higher order aberration, quadrafoil (Z440), corneal astigmatism and 3 and 5 mm central zone corneal irregularity (all P-values < 0.0001). In addition, it improves vertical coma (P:0.003) and secondary astigmatism (Z420) (P:0.004). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that surgical excision of the pterygium improves visual acuity, refractive errors and most of the corneal topographic indices and wavefront analysis parameters.
BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common disorder of the ocular surface. It causes vision impairment -usually irregular type astigmatism- through different mechanisms. In addition, it is believed that surgical excision of the pterygium improves visual problems. The appropriate method to investigate irregular astigmatism is using wavefront analysis. This study was aimed to evaluate wavefront analysis pre and post pterygium surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed on 32 patients who underwent surgical excision of pterygium in January 2012. Data were recorded and compared after pre and postoperative comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations including uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, Orbscan, wavefront analysis and autorefraction to figure out the effects of surgery on different parameters. RESULTS: Comparison of pre and postoperative parameters showed that surgical treatment of the pterygium improves numerous parameters significantly including uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, spherical and cylinder refractive error, higher order aberration, quadrafoil (Z440), corneal astigmatism and 3 and 5 mm central zone corneal irregularity (all P-values < 0.0001). In addition, it improves vertical coma (P:0.003) and secondary astigmatism (Z420) (P:0.004). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that surgical excision of the pterygium improves visual acuity, refractive errors and most of the corneal topographic indices and wavefront analysis parameters.
Pterygium is a benign, elevated, superficial, wedge-shaped fibrovascular proliferation of the conjunctiva which extends onto the corneal surface.[123] It occurs more commonly in people who have had prolonged UV light exposure, and who lives or works in hot dry windy or dusty environments.[4]Pterygium invades into the cornea, and consequently, may cause visual disturbance due to corneal curvature abnormalities. It causes blurred vision as a result of astigmatism which is usually irregular type.[3567] On the other hand, several studies report that surgical removal of the pterygium leads to improvement of the pterygium induced impaired vision.[3589101112]Given the importance of vision impairment, some investigations are performed to determine the impacts of pterygium on refraction and corneal topography. Most of these studies have quantified pterygium induced visual disturbances as sphere or astigmatism changes; however, it is well-known that sphere and cylinder are not appropriate methods to assess irregular astigmatism.[35910111213]Wavefront analysis is a more accurate method for detailed evaluation of optical system of the eye. Imperfections in the refractive surface of the anterior and posterior cornea and the lens can be detected through this method. The estimation of the optical quality of the eye provided by the wavefront analysis is extended beyond the description of spherical and cylindrical refractive errors, and it can measure higher order aberrations (HOA).[14151617] Therefore, it is believed that wavefront analysis can provide a better assessment of the pterygium induced irregular astigmatism, its effects on the eyesight and impacts of surgery on restoration of normal vision.[18]This study was designed to determine and compare wavefront analysis before and after the surgical treatment of pterygium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was performed on patients with visually significant pterygium referred to the Feiz medical center (Isfahan, Iran) in January 2012.After approval of the study by the ethic committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and obtaining informed consent, 32 patients who had pterygium on the nasal side of the eye entered this investigation.Patients who had recurrent pterygium, atypical pterygium, cataract or keratoconus were excluded from the study.In order to record preoperative characteristics, a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination was performed on all patients before the surgery. This examination included uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, Orbscan, wavefront analysis and autorefraction.Then, patients underwent pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft, accompanied by using mitomycin C. The surgery was performed by a single ophthalmologist.After the surgery, all patients were commenced on Betamethasone eye drop (1 drop every 3 hours) and Ciprofleuxacin eye drop (1 drop every 6 hours) for 3 and 1 week, respectively.Three months after the procedure, patients were re-examined regarding uncorrected and corrected visual acuity. Moreover, corneal topography and corneal wavefront analysis were performed for all patients. In order to minimize artifacts and aberration, the examination was done with pupil size of 5 mm.Data were analyzed by SPSS 16 software. One-way ANOVA and paired-T-test were used when appropriate.P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics
The present study investigated 32 patients (18 men and 14 women) with a mean age of 52.23 ± 12.35 years (range: 18-76 years).
Visual acuity
Three months after the operation, both uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity was significantly higher than preoperative values [Table 1]. Comparison of the mean of pre and postoperative LogMar is presented in Figure 1.
Table 1
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative visual acuity
Figure 1
Comparison of the mean of preoperative and postoperative LogMar (uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity). (P<0.0001)
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative visual acuityComparison of the mean of preoperative and postoperative LogMar (uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity). (P<0.0001)None of the patients had postoperative deteriorated visual acuity [Figure 2].
Figure 2
Postoperative visual acuity change status presented as the number of patients and change in the number of Snellen chart lines
Postoperative visual acuity change status presented as the number of patients and change in the number of Snellen chart lines
Wavefront analysis
Preoperative mean refractive sphere was 1.67 ± 2.17D which was significantly higher than postoperative refractive sphere 0.89 ± 1.27 (P value: 0.007). Similarly, there was significant difference between preoperative and postoperative mean refractive cylinder (–1.89 ± 1.69 vs.–0.77 ± 0.58, respectively, P-value < 0.0001).No significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative axis (118.43 ± 64.60 vs. 109.28 ± 10.51, P value: 0.13).In regard with other wavefront analysis parameters, we found significant difference between preoperative and postoperative values of high order root mean square (HO RMS) for 5 mm wavefront diameter, RMS of vertical coma, RMS of quadrafoil (Z440) and RMS of secondary astigmatism(Z420) [Table 2 and Figure 3].
Table 2
Comparison of pre and postoperative HOA parameters
Figure 3
comparison of high-order parameters pre and postoperation
Comparison of pre and postoperative HOA parameterscomparison of high-order parameters pre and postoperation
Orbscan topography
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative Orbscan corneal topography revealed significant difference in corneal astigmatism, corneal irregularity in the central 3 mm and 5 mm zone [Table 3]. Angle of surgically induced astigmatism is presented in Figure 4.
Table 3
Comparison of pre and postoperative topographic parameters
Figure 4
Angle of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA: Surgically induced astigmatism)
Comparison of pre and postoperative topographic parametersAngle of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA: Surgically induced astigmatism)
DISCUSSION
Pterygium is a common disease of the ocular surface which has well known impacts on optical irregularities and distortion. It causes visual impairment not only by invading the visual axis or distorting the central topography, but also by inducing a focal corneal flattening and severe astigmatism;[710] however, the exact mechanism of these changes has not been well understood yet.[18] Based on the available evidence, surgical treatment of the pterygium usually improves corneal irregularity and visual performance,[3589101112] and reverses most of the corneal topographic changes.[192021]In the present study, we investigated effects of surgical treatment of pterygium on different aspects of visual performance.Pterygium may cause correctable refractive errors.[18] Postoperative mean refractive error (both spherical and cylinder) was significantly lower than preoperative values. Consequently, comparing to the preoperative examination, both uncorrected and best corrected postoperative visual acuity had significant improvement. These findings confirm the previous studies performed by Oh et al.[22] and Bahar et al.[19] which reported improved visual acuity after pterygium surgery. Pterygium induced impaired visual acuity may be caused by alteration in tear film or by mechanical effects of the lesion. Therefore, excision of the lesion may lead to reconstruction of the normal surface, and thus, improvement in the visual acuity.The most important part of the optical quality of the eye is comprised of ocular wavefront aberrations.[8] It is believed that pterygium is associated with wavefront aberrations, and increases higher order wavefront aberrations for all Zernike orders and modes, especially trefoil. According to the previous studies, most of the HOA are eliminated after surgical removal of the pterygium.[18]Based on our results, pterygium surgery improves several parameters of wavefront analysis. The present study supports findings of Pesudovs et al.[18]Comparison of pre and postoperative corneal topography also revealed significant changes in the majority of topographic parameters. Similar to what we observed, numerous studies have documented improvement in the corneal condition and topographic indices after pterygium excision.[1921232425]Two other studies performed by Maheshwari[26] and Yousuf[27] demonstrated that after removal of the pterygium, cornea becomes more regular.Unlike Yasar et al.[28] who considered no role for fibrovascular traction in pterygium induced corneal changes, Oldenburg et al.[29] and Budak et al.[30] hypothesized that flattening of the cornea and changes in the corneal topography may be produced by a pooling of tears at the apex of the pterygium or by its mechanical traction. These abnormalities and their effects on the cornea are mostly reversible by the surgery especially in the cases of early intervention.[2]In summary, we conclude that surgical excision of the pterygium improves visual acuity, refractive errors and most of the corneal topographic indices and wavefront analysis parameters.
Authors: Steven C Schallhorn; Ayad A Farjo; David Huang; Brian S Boxer Wachler; William B Trattler; David J Tanzer; Parag A Majmudar; Alan Sugar Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Fatin Nabihah Jais; Mohd Zulfaezal Che Azemin; Mohd Radzi Hilmi; Mohd Izzuddin Mohd Tamrin; Khairidzan Mohd Kamal Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2021-11-15